Nonilex, to legal
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

After brashly declaring he wanted to #testify in his #criminal trial, it appears increasingly unlikely that #Trump will do so, as the #jury seems poised to hear #ClosingArguments next week.
Defendants rarely testify, because their #lawyers advise them that the risks of doing so, particularly when it comes to being questioned by prosecutors #UnderOath, are simply too great.

#TrumpTrial #law #CatchAndKill #conspiracy #ElectionInterference
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/18/trump-trial-testifying/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

In Trump’s case, the judge’s discussions w/ in recent days indicate that even if the defense calls a small number of witnesses, they do not expect to be one….
4 people close to Trump said next wk’s plan does not include him testifying, & they expect the to start deliberating later in the wk. Trump is famously mercurial & could always demand to testify….

tim, to disability
@tim@union.place avatar

I've got a good friend who's looking for help: if anyone in Los Angeles knows of a good disability lawyer who only takes a reasonable percentage of back pay awarded, please reach out and let me know, and I will pass it along.

Nonilex, to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

🧵 Thurs, May 2

charges are falsifying business records to hide payments in lead up to 2016 election to electorate

just one Trump supporter at the courthouse draped in a Trump flag.

's lawyer, , to return to stand. He negotiated the hush-money payment at the center of the case, & is expected to lay out details of the deal.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

#Bove insisted that #KeithDavidson was familiar w/ #extortion law after the brush w/ federal agents.

Bove also suggested that Davidson violated California's #ethics code for #lawyers by compensating non-lawyers w/ legal fees.

Lunch break

#Trump #criminal #law #CatchAndKill #conspiracy #ElectionInterference #TrumpTrial

msquebanh, to legal
@msquebanh@mastodon.sdf.org avatar

As Ontarians call for a permanent , the Association has documented a marked increase in in engaging in through their and their actions. One such example is the 's decision to bar entry into to individuals wearing the

https://muslimlink.ca/news/arab-canadian-lawyers-association-acla-statement-regarding-anti-palestinian-racism-and-the-queen-s-park-keffiyeh-ban

Nonilex, to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Start of testimony day3 (I’m not counting jury selection or off days) 🧵

Publisher to Resume Testimony

, the longtime publisher of The , is expected to return to the stand & describe the deal w/ at the heart of the case, in which is charged w/ 34 .

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

While were on break, the argued about a complex matter involving in certain exhibits. Defense succeeded in not allowing in texts between , editor of The in 2016, & a family member about Trump's election. But Justice also endorsed prosecution's interpretation of 's arrangement w/ & as a .

jerrylevine, to legal
@jerrylevine@mastodon.social avatar

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar is simply one of the best in the United States of America. Brilliant, eidetic memory, persuasive, and just all-around incredible.

cindyweinstein, to random

Excellent question regarding and the case currently in front of the : "How is this not a scandal of epic proportions?" ()

https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-faces-backlash-over-jan-6-case-comments-what-disgrace-1890966

cindyweinstein,

@MarkRDavid. I would love to hear more from a / professor about past . My understanding is that can make the request, but it's up to the justice to decide if they can be impartial.

GottaLaff, to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

I’ll start a 🧵

I will NOT (& often CANNOT) answer questions, so please don’t ask me any. If you have a comment/question for the universe, please label it “NFL” (Not For Laffy) so I can skip thru my replies.

1/… Via Pagliery:

Trump is sitting in court now, surrounded on both sides by his lawyers.
(More…)

cindyweinstein,

@GottaLaff. NFL. reading this thread -- is this allowed? Add to the fine for violating the gag order? Or a new penalty?

katzenberger, to Battlemaps
@katzenberger@social.tchncs.de avatar

German officers making up a fictitious ban against , allegedly issued by the German of the , and serving this lie straight to the face of two ?

Wow.
Just wow.

I'd like to see some answers from both the ministry and the police.

https://diem25.org/chronicle-of-the-betatigungsverbot-against-yanis-varoufakis/

ubo,
@ubo@social.tchncs.de avatar

@katzenberger "German officers making up a fictitious ban against , allegedly issued by the German of the , and serving this lie straight to the face of two "

WTF?!

cindyweinstein, to legal

excellent, concise piece that not only explains the seriousness of the #election interference case (aka the hush money case, which is more salacious-sounding and therefore used more often) but the incorrect arguments, offered by some #lawyers and #media (this coverage contributed to my dropping the #WashingtonPost, I believe it was a #RuthMarcus piece poo-pooing the case) about the seriousness of the case (buttressed of course by calling it the hush money case).

https://popular.info/p/people-v-trump

realjuddlegum, to random

In 5 days, Donald Trump will report to the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse to stand trial

For more than a year, the media has told us the hush money case is flimsy and would likely benefit Trump politically

You know who doesn't believe that?

Donald Trump and his lawyers

That's why they are trying anything and everything to delay the trial

They understand this case is serious

It's about how Trump used illegal means to hide the truth from the people and secure victory in 2016

https://popular.info/p/people-v-trump

CindyWeinstein,
@CindyWeinstein@zirk.us avatar

@realjuddlegum.
thank you for this excellent, concise piece that not only explains the seriousness of the #election interference case (aka the hush money case, which is more salacious-sounding and therefore used more often) but the incorrect arguments, offered by some #lawyers & #media (this coverage contributed to my dropping the #WashingtonPost, I believe it was a #RuthMarcus piece poo-pooing the case) about its seriousness (buttressed of course by calling it the hush money case).

cmorris, to uk
@cmorris@mastodon.social avatar

: ‘3 former supreme court justices…are among more than 600 , & retired senior warning that the UK…is breaching int’l law by continuing to arm … “The ’s conclusion that there exists a plausible risk of genocide in has placed your government on notice that weapons might be used in its commission & that the suspension of their provision is thus…‘a measure to prevent’ .”’ | Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/former-supreme-court-judges-say-uk-arming-israel-breaches-international-law Full letter : https://lawyersletter.uk/

blogdiva, to legal
@blogdiva@mastodon.social avatar

OOOH!
onhere & :

so this by @beccadax
«Resolved: Since Elon has given up the name “Twitter” anyway, you can now tweet on any microblogging service.
I am tweeting a tweet right now.»
https://mastodon.social/@beccadax@queer.party/112219585808722649

makes me wonder:

since Apartheidboi rebranded , and seems hell bent on destroying anything related to Twitter; is it an abandoned trademark? even if not, can tweet be transformed into a generic term for microblogging?

north, to Cybersecurity
@north@xn--8r9a.com avatar

Look, reporters, I'm not going to beg you to cover my #court #cybersecurity #vulnerabilities, but I'm not above it either.

For the three reporters who have written articles about this, and the one who provided invaluable guidance, my gratitude is endless. This post doesn't apply to you, nor "the feds", the cybersecurity experts, or #lawyers (including and especially @eff), who were extremely helpful. The rest, however, should take note.

I've willingly laid my neck on a chopping block, unprotected, for over six months.

My outreach has been exhaustive:

• Attempted to engage with over 150 journalists and #news organizations,
• Coordinated frequently with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (#CISA or "the feds"),
• Consulted with numerous cybersecurity experts,
• Sought advice from multiple lawyers,
• Spoke with ten state and state court CISOs,
• Attempted to talk to several dozen state and county court clerks and judges,
• Sent emails to every Florida State Senator, State Representative, and Supreme Court justice, and to multiple governors,
• Discussed with the staff of multiple U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives,
• Contacted twelve vendors and over 40 employees

I've offered to write articles -- for free.

I've had no fewer than eight background checks done on me.

I've been cyberstalked by the Arizona Supreme Court.

I've put my job and my family's livelihood at risk in more ways than one.

I've made a grand total of $0; in fact, I've invested several hundred.

When I'm able to sleep, it's with one eye open, always waiting for "that" knock on the door.

After my first #disclosure, I prepared for a week to deal with what I expected to be a #media circus. What I received was one preemptive email from a state court #CISO (who was not affected) and one kind person (who is not a #journalist) on the #fediverse.

I've spent over 900 hours discovering, documenting, reporting, and disclosing vulnerabilities, trying to get this fixed on a mass scale, and attempting to contact the above list. I see no signs of this slowing down any time soon. All of this for what is merely a #hobby.

I've done my part. It's time for reporters to step up. The real-world harm these vulnerabilities have caused — and continue to cause — cannot be overstated. The need for widespread awareness and action is urgent.

Context: https://github.com/qwell/disclosures/

Email: north@ꩰ.com
Signal: north.01

#infosec #govtech #privacy #technology #law #journalism

Nonilex, to california
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The has recommended that fmr be , a judge said in a filing on Wed
was charged w/multiple disciplinary counts by the State of on allegations that he engaged in "a course of conduct to plan, promote, & assist then-Pres Trump in executing a strategy, unsupported by or , to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election."
https://abcnews.go.com/US/california-state-bar-recommends-trump-attorney-john-eastman/story?id=108566036

Nonilex, (edited )
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Just a quick rundown of the fates of the various who were involved in the :

Besides & , both were in court today for disbarment proceedings, 3 other for in 2020 — , & — pleaded to charges in risking their law licenses.

=

1/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

, & 7 other were found to have fed courts & the process, a fed judge in ruled. Judge Parker of ’s Fed Dist Court ordered the lawyers to be referred to the local authorities in their home states for possible or .

2/
=
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/08/25/election-lawyers-ordered-pay-state-city-costs-may-face-disbarment/8162355002/

Nonilex, to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Fmr ofcl & “acting [ ” for ~1hr] could face for aiding
At a hearing, a DC Bar atty accused Clark of attempting a Dept ‘’ in support of ’s false election fraud claims


https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/03/26/jeffrey-clark-trump-bar-license-revocation-hearing/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Fox was addressing an investigatory panel of that eventually will decide whether , who was appointed as an asst AG by Trump in 2017, should face professional , including possibly being stripped of his in DC. The proceeding is expected to last into next wk.
Fox told the 3-member panel that Clark… repeatedly violated department when he tried to help overturn ’s presidential election results & undo Joe ’s victory….

paninid, to legal
@paninid@mastodon.world avatar

“Lawyers do their service by finding novel interpretations with formal (watertight) arguments under a system of constitutional axioms to better Human Condition.”


https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sarkarsoumen_introducing-lawyer-theorem-in-this-post-activity-7177141378034937856-xpNf?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios

notsle, to legal
@notsle@kzoo.to avatar

can i legally refuse to be in online meetings with A.I. "note taking" apps without fear of employer retribution?

n, to Software
@n@zeroes.ca avatar

I just got denied a in because of what I read are ly protected grounds. And hey, just like usual, they put it all in writing so it's a live fish in a small barrel.

Are there any who care about folks that want to read my email to the company and help me gain fair compensation? I'm in Canada but applying to the US (California), also cross listed in Canada, if that helps. If this is your passion but it had a fair fee, I'd love to meet for a pro-bono quote. Just dm me your phone.

(Any greedy lawyers excited to wring my pocketbook dry on fees can immediately quit reading, as I'm far too quick to the con so do save yourself the time and find a better mark.)

I'm fairly sharp with these matters, so please just boost if you aren't a lawyer -- no need to reply. Do please reply if you know better hashtags to boost this.

Thanks for ANY boost... I am a very experienced and exceptionally talented software engineer without a job (15mo!) because of my protected limitations and need to stop losing time and spirit on cases like these. !

Emeraldia's Legal Dilemma on SF and FA

Well, Hazel3/CuteVixen/HazeltheVixen was scolded by FreeLawChat and a Crowd of Mean Lawyers due to suing Cease and Desist Lawsuit. She was listening to Online Internet Laws about Harassment and Bullying with the Attorney in the Court. The Attorney would Fix Fur Affinity's Laws. Wiping the Profile Page, Journal Header/Footer, and...

ChrisMayLA6, to legal
@ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us avatar

So who wins from the abolition of status... the Treasury?... well maybe, but the immediate winners (as ever) are going to be the & employed by the rich to game the (new) system, or try to change its character.

Ever was it thus....

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/mar/07/treasury-non-dom-tax-policy-budget-taxation

SteveThompson, to TeslaMotors
@SteveThompson@mastodon.social avatar

"Lawyers for a Tesla shareholder successfully sunk Elon Musk's $56 billion pay package from Tesla. Now they're asking a judge for about 11% of the Tesla shares, worth about $6 billion, for attorneys fees."

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-delaware-tesla-pay-package-lawyers-six-billion-stock-2024-3

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • JUstTest
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines