tanepiper, to reddit
@tanepiper@tane.codes avatar

Well fuck - they have just undeleted posts I made years ago that I'd removed when I did a purge a couple of years back.

So Reddit didn't actually delete the data - also these videos are no longer on YT so the thumb is cached

They are so fucked

https://mstdn.social/@hkrn/110553743836119207

EU_Commission, to random
@EU_Commission@social.network.europa.eu avatar

🔒 Your data, your choice.
💪 Your data, your right.

Since 25 May 2018, we have been busy enforcing the General Data Protection Regulation – our response to the rapid increase in personal data collection and sharing within our Union and outside.

The has ensured personal data is processed securely, fairly, and with your explicit consent.

More than that, it has provided monitoring and sanctioning powers to spearhead a Digital EU that respects your data and fuels progress.

aral, to fediverse
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

snarfed.org and brid.gy for bridging fediverse folks to Bluesky against their will (and in likely contravention of GDPR in the EU) with typical Silicon Valley techbro sense of entitlement:

“[O]pt in results in far fewer users, and users are critical for a bridge to be useful.”¹

Relevant GitHub issue: https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/835

¹ https://snarfed.org/2023-11-27_re-introducing-bridgy-fed

HT @homegrown

NatureMC, (edited ) to threads
@NatureMC@mastodon.online avatar

🧵1/3 Tested for you: If I an or people privately, I can no longer interact with them after a short wait, even though I can still see the profile. But I have tried this with and it does NOT work!
Regardless of whether I block the whole domain or just one account (test with Insta-Boss), I can still interact and comment (he probably, too?). So I will have to move to another instance with ▶️ https://fedipact.online/ @Gargron

darnell, to fediverse
@darnell@one.darnell.one avatar

The flagship #Misskey instance is experiencing growing pains, but is also discouraging #Fediverse residents in #Europe (or rather the #EuropeanUnion 🇪🇺) from signing up due to #GDPR issues.

👉🏾 https://darnell.day/misskey-io-20-000-new-users-daily-discourages-europeans-from-signing-up-over

Too long; Did Not Read:

👉🏾 Misskey (https://misskey.io) signing up 20,000 new users per day
👉🏾 After consulting lawyers, Misskey.io will now discourage Europeans from signing up
👉🏾 #Firefish could fill in the vacuum in Europe

Tutanota, (edited ) to privacy
@Tutanota@mastodon.social avatar

Meta thinks your is for sale.

Would you pay 160 euros per year to Facebook for respecting your right to privacy?

Comment below! 👇

michael, to privacy
@michael@thms.uk avatar

“The fediverse is a privacy nightmare” - A lot of good thoughts by @Bloonface

Whilst the headline may be inflammatory, the thrust of the article stands: That as soon as you publish anything on the fediverse it'll get copied to 10’s of 1,000's of servers, and is then completely and irrevocably out of your control.

Some may argue that's a feature rather than a bug (and I'd be tempted to agree to a large extent), but I wonder what proportion of the fediverse is aware - let alone understand the implications - of it.

https://blog.bloonface.com/2023/07/04/the-fediverse-is-a-privacy-nightmare/

#privacy #gdpr #fediverse #mastodon

jynersolives, (edited ) to internet
@jynersolives@mastodon.social avatar

The more I read on #Meta, #ActivityPub and #GDPR, I get the impression that the fundamental architecture of the #Fediverse is almost incompatible with GDPR. How is this discussed within the Fedi #admin circle?

EDIT: because people ask me, here are two insightful sources:

(1) by @Bloonface https://blog.bloonface.com/2023/07/04/the-fediverse-is-a-privacy-nightmare/

(2) a thread by @alex https://cybervillains.com/@alex/110670465308094895

openrightsgroup, to privacy
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Meta is proposing a paid option to opt-out of advertising on Instagram and Facebook. It's basically extortion to have your right to protected.

Ads can and should be delivered without resorting to illegal that violates users' rights and exposes them to predatory or discriminatory advertising.

If can't conduct their business legally, that should be their problem to solve not ours.

ORG's @marianods responds.

https://globaldatareview.com/article/meta-payment-plans-face-headwinds

darnell, to Europe
@darnell@one.darnell.one avatar

@Brendanjones @6beer @aggeka @alexeheath It’s about #GDPR being enforceable against my sites. Since three of the instances I use are in #Europe, the #EuropeanUnion 🇪🇺 could technically (& physically) shut my sites down.

If I am located outside of the European Union 🇪🇺, they could issues decrees & I would simply ignore them (which is what #Threads is doing).

konstantin, to privacy

About GDPR, I think it's so much more than "the cookie law”. In retrospect, it achieved exactly what it was designed to do - make it possible to see what's really happening with our data.
That we blindly accept cookie banners without holding companies accountable for doing so much tracking (or as devs, using tools without asking if the data they gather is needed) is totally on us. GDPR did give us the means, we're not yet taking full advantage of it. 🔐

#privacy #gdpr

ilumium, to meta
@ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar

Today: #DMA #compliance workshop with #Meta lawyers at the @EU_Commission:

The #DigitalMarketsAct mandates Meta to "enable end users to freely choose to opt-in to [combining or cross-using personal data] by offering a less personalised but equivalent alternative".

When I pointed out to Meta that by offering users to either #consent to #SurveillanceAds or pay € 275 per year for #Instagram & #Facebook isn't "equivalent alternative" they said, Meta has to do that because of #GDPR 😤 Really??

malteengeler, to internet German
@malteengeler@legal.social avatar

Ok, so today the #ECJ published its judgement for case C-252/21 #Meta. The case touches upon issues I have been writing about since #GDPR became applicable. I’ll focus on the #GDPR and broader data economy issues only.

Let’s go 🧵

Frederik_Borgesius, to privacy

‘A major error at the Netherlands’ Cadastre, Land Registry and Mapping Agency (Kadaster) has resulted in the personal information and residential addresses of millions of homeowners in the Netherlands being freely available online’. https://www.iamexpat.nl/expat-info/dutch-expat-news/millions-addresses-available-online-after-major-dutch-data-leak Original reporting by Daniël van der Laan:
https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/nederland/artikel/5402140/kadaster-lek-opzoeken-woonadressen-miljoenen-nederlanders

choyer, to reddit

#Reddit users are mad about the #API charges that hit third party #apps, but I actually find this from #Huffman much more concerning: "...data licensing is a new potential business for us."

What he's actually saying - they want to sell user data to AI companies for them to train their models. This should be a reason to delete all your content and leave the platform. In Europe, you should raise a #GDPR-deletion request.

Alternatives are #kbin, #lemmy and #friendica.

https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/15/23762868/reddit-ceo-steve-huffman-interview

Edent, to privacy
@Edent@mastodon.social avatar

🆕 blog! “Envelopes and GDPR”

Privacy is a funny concept, isn't it? Very few people want the whole world to know what medical complaints they have. But most hospitals are open-access buildings, where the waiting rooms have large monitors to tell patients that their doctor is running late. A few years ago I was sat in the proctology waiting room. […]

👀 Read more: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2024/01/envelopes-and-gdpr/

#gdpr #privacy

OC For those in the know about privacy laws and the such. What is a proper response to reddit's claim that they cannot remove all the information associated to an account without first the user removing all of their posts?

As the title says, Reddit replied to my GDPR request to delete all my data saying I had to do it first, which I suspect is in violation of GDPR law....

louis, to DeGoogle
@louis@emacs.ch avatar

Today I "converted" one of my clients from using Google Analytics to privacy-friendly Plausible.io, made by the excellent guys at @plausible.

It took me quite an effort to convince them to do that, but eventually I succeeded. I feel I've made the world a tiny little bit a better place.

If you still use Google Analytics for your own website, stop it right now and consider using a privacy-friendly alternative.

aral, to DaftPunk
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

Daft is so apt.

What the fuck state are those switches in, Daft?

#daft #ios #app #ireland #gdpr #cookies

Edent, to random
@Edent@mastodon.social avatar

🆕 blog! “How do you stop people accessing data they shouldn't?”

I used to work in a call centre for a Very Big Company. Every week, without exception, we'd get a bunch of new starters to train. And every week, without exception, a newbie would be fired after looking up a famous person's data. This was in the days before GDPR. There was a lot less […]

👀 Read more: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2023/05/how-do-you-stop-people-accessing-data-they-shouldnt/

#CyberSecurity #gdpr

brunty, to random
@brunty@brunty.social avatar

The website states: "You must ask people to actively opt in. Don’t use pre-ticked boxes, opt-out boxes or other default settings." https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/lawful-basis/a-guide-to-lawful-basis/lawful-basis-for-processing/consent/

But when I put forward a website violating that was misusing my data and used opt-out checkboxes the ICO replied:
"Having reviewed the organisation’s use of tick boxes for customers to opt-out of postal marketing and the sharing of their data with third parties, we can confirm that the organisation has acted within ICO guidelines."

darnell, to wordpress
@darnell@one.darnell.one avatar

I posted about on my blog (an iPadOS 17 bug ate my post post! 😱)

👉🏾 GDPR Verses The Fediverse‽ Better Call Saul (The Lawyer) https://darnell.tv/2023/07/15/gdpr-verses-fediverse/

Too Long; Did Not Read:

👉🏾 According to @RobertJBateman obtaining IP addresses & even usernames (via Federation‽) sans consent could violate 🇪🇺 law 😱
👉🏾 A privacy policy may or may not be enough
👉🏾 If not compliant, I will migrate my , & instances out of .

konstantin, to random

All I want is a CDN that's also private in a way that I don't need to include any US entities on the list of sub processors. I guess bunny.net is not on the list 🔓

#privacy #gdpr #openai #bunny.net #cdn

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • provamag3
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines