even if you never use a microsoft product, people you interact with whom you trust, who may intend to respect your confidences, will unwittingly be running recall.
And we're done! #FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE is working great here, smooth transition. And it looks like ungoogled-chromium made its way back into the repos again, so I think I'll be able to work with it!
Not sure why the fetch shows it still in 14.0, though.
@jason123santa lowkey I wanna do something like that (windows XP theme) in front of my infosec team one day. When they ask what I'm doing I'll say "oh, just decided to work from my personal machine today as I have some other stuff I have to do. Hope that's alright."
> Daniel Wallace, a United States citizen, sued the Free Software Foundation (FSF) for price fixing. In a later lawsuit, he unsuccessfully sued IBM, Novell, and Red Hat. Wallace claimed that free Linux prevented him from making a profit from selling his own operating system
Of course, to hell with IBM, and no idea why the suit was filed under their name, since the dude was actually after the FSF because of the GPL out of everyone in the industry.
Again: HE TRIED TO SUE OVER A LICENSE THAT LITERALLY SAYS "USE AS YOU WISH, SELL IT, EVEN, DON'T BLAME US IF IT DOESN'T WORK!"
At least lol @ this:
> His fourth and final amended complaint was dismissed on March 20, 2006, by Judge John Daniel Tinder, and Wallace was ordered to pay the FSF's costs
@j1984pm sí, un ótimo cliente XMPP. Creo que es también el único cliente CLI que soporta #OMEMO por default (sin addon, etc). Otros clientes CLI interesantes son #mcabber y #poezio (escrito en Python).
So I think I finally found out why in one of my #Devuan#Unstable installs #apt fails to check signatures of packages (or so I hope).
It seems that apt's sig checking function is outsourced to the gpgv (not gpg) program, whose restricted usage is solely to check signatures. In the "broken" 2.2.40 version, apt passes some invalid command-line argumments resulting in failure. But in v2.2.43 this doesn't happen anymore. Not sure if this is surely the cause, but it's getting warmer.
Next thing I found... the broken gpgv program is actually NOT a part of gpg, but rather from the Sequoia PGP project. The only problem is this: I can't uninstall it and install the gpg version instead!
Also, gpg seems horribly out of date here: 2.2.43 against 2.4.5 in Debian Sid repos, when I'm also running unstable (???)
@hyde I gave up on this quest years ago. Today, if someone outright says to my face they don't care about #privacy, I just shake their hand, wish them good luck and walk away. End of conversation. Nothing in the book says that I must bear that person, and that attitude is a sign that I didn't miss much anyway.
@hyde but chances are that the person who asked has a smartphone at that precise moment. Ask to see it. If it's locked, ask "hey, why is it locked? Are you hiding anything from me?" If they say something about "security," you go "against what? Are you under attack? Are a person of interest or- WHOA WTF ARE YOU A TERRORIST?!"
Eventually they will admit it's privacy, and you can call their bluff. And if that phone was unlocked, well, bon appetit digging through their dirty shit!
> On 22 May 2016, a 34-year-old woman in Madrid, Spain, was charged under Article 37 of the Citizen Safety Law for carrying a bag displaying the acronym "A.C.A.B." accompanied by the words "All Cats Are Beautiful". The charges were dropped 3 days later.
@aner same. But just 10min ago I bit it and changed my default search engine to a #searx instance I used to use. Working great so far... except for some instant answers things like weather.
Well it's back up again, but I kind of enjoyed the ride; re-visiting #Searx after a while was a great refresher. I shall do it more often to fight data silos.