I think maybe #Debian 12 with #XFCE is literally perfect for me. And that's without doing anything in terminals, only clicking around in GUI settings. I didn't even have to install any additional packages.
Wie kann ich in /etc/network/interfaces in #Debian es einstellen, dass auf allen Interfaces #DHCP gemacht wird, auch wenn ich jetzt noch nicht weiß, wie das Interface in Zukunft heißen wird?
Jetzt steht da halt:
iface enp1s0 inet dhcp
Aber auf einer anderen Hardware heißt das Ding ja vielleicht eth0 statt enp1s0...
Also was tun?
Brauch ich ein Startupscript, dass die Config generiert?
And of course, thank you to the free & open source projects & communities of Linux, Debian, and GNOME for many of the improvements we’re shipping in Endless OS 6. We strongly believe in open source, and would not be able to have the impact we do without standing on the shoulders of the projects we build upon. 🧡
I gave up because pipx refuses to install urwid, and I think Debian's version is drumroll way too old. ;)
I wish pipx just had scli. There's an scli package in PyPI, but it's literally an empty placeholder for nothing.
Infuriating.
The funny part about the removal of networking from the default #keepassxc package on #debian, is that they did it for "security" reasons, without thinking that the MOST INSECURE way to transfer a #password to your #browser is via the CLIPBOARD. Absolutely every running app or service can read the clipboard! And yet, that's the default way they expect users to do it now!
🌀 16 years of CVE-2008-0166 - Debian OpenSSL Bug
— 16years.secvuln.info
"A patch in Debian's and Ubuntu's OpenSSL packages broke the random number generator, effectively limiting the number of possible keys to a few ten thousand plausible variations"
On the topic of "key rotation, it's not just for HTTPS", @hanno finds hundreds of DKIM keys apparently generated using the #Debian#OpenSSL predictable PRNG vulenrability from 2008 (CVE-2008-0166):
Wenn der Package-Maintainer die Software die er packertiert selber nicht nutzt... Ich hab schon wieder massive Kopfschmerzen...
"...schreibt Klode, dass er die [...] diese Funktionen entfernt. Diese dienten vermutlich dem Nachladen eines favicon einer Webseite, meint der Maintainer. Er gehe davon aus, dass die meisten Leute nicht wollten, dass ihre Passwort-Manager irgendwohin verbinden, wovon sie nichts wüssten."
Schade das der Maintainer des Debian-Paketes nicht ansatzweise die Funktionalität eines Passwortmanagers verstanden hat. Meiner Meinung nach missbraucht hier ein Paketbetreuer seine Kompetenzen. Letzlich schadet er mit seiner Vorgehensweise Debian insgesamt als Linuxdistribution.
The whole #KeePassXC#Debian thing is kinda giving me second thoughts wrt. the whole #Linux distro and #opensource packaging thing in general. My understanding of the implied agreement between me as a dev and a distro's package maintainer is: the maintainer, to the best of their ability, tries to make my software work "as intended". In return, they get to publish it under my software's name.
That's clearly not how Debian views things. And I can't accept distros publishing broken sw w/ my name.
I see some people are really disappointed about Debian packaging a stripped-down version of KeePassXC. But hey, I actually wish there was also a minimal @thunderbird package without integrations of IRC or Matrix etc, just with core email functionality.