Teri_Kanefield

@Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online

Hi, everyone! I am moving to https://mastodon.social/

Former appellate defender and UC Berkeley Law graduate. My practice was limited to representing indigents on appeal.

I’ve written more than a dozen books and published more than 50 short pieces in The Washington Post, Cnn.com, and others. My book prizes include the Jane Addams Book Award.

Tfr

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Teri_Kanefield, to random

If you missed it, I'm moving servers. See my pinned post.

Here's my latest in the account that I will soon be moving to:

https://mastodon.social/

Teri_Kanefield, (edited ) to random

Hi, everyone:

As I posted earlier, I'm switching servers.

If you missed it, see my pinned post for how I am going about this.

Meanwhile, , reading Chutkan's decision shooting down Trump's immunity claims.

It's here:
@Teri_Kanefield

Teri_Kanefield, to random

I posted my first thread in my new home.

You can find it here:
https://mastodon.social/

(Until I initiate the migration function, I will post there and do links here. The last time I tried migration, I had issues with it, so I'd like to move as many people as possible first so I don't lose people again in Mastodon Purgatory.)

Teri_Kanefield, (edited ) to random

Hi, everyone,

I moved to a different server.

My new account is here:
@Teri_Kanefield

Teri_Kanefield, (edited ) to random

Hi, Fediverse friends,

I have been busy with a technical glitch. I needed to restore a backup of my Wordpress author website, my backup service had a glitch, and to make a sad story short, I am currently rebuilding my author website.

I may shut down my private Mastodon server and move to an established server.

My server is more work and money than we anticipated.

After this past week, I’m inclined to spend less time on technical stuff.

I’ll let you know if I’m going to move.

GottaLaff, to Georgia
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via Kyle Griffin:

The #Georgia Supreme Court has refused to approve rules for a new commission to discipline and remove state prosecutors — meaning the commission can't operate.

Republicans wanted the commission to baselessly discipline or remove Fulton County District Attorney #FaniWillis. #legal #TrumpIndictment

Teri_Kanefield,

@GottaLaff

Kyle is wrong. The goal wasn't to go after Fani Willis.

See: https://terikanefield.com/rogue-prosecutors/

Teri_Kanefield,

@GottaLaff Thanks I checked back to make sure nobody was offended :)

I was rather brusque.

pjanovsky, to random

@Teri_Kanefield HiTeri -- What's the latest o n the "Fediverse?" Iwant to follow people I follow on Twitter on other platforms, but it's difficult to go from one to the other searching for them.

Teri_Kanefield,

@pjanovsky

Welcome

One thing to do is look at who I follow. Go to the bottom and you can see who I followed first. Some of those are not active so you can click through and see how recently they have posted.

I follow a combination of lawyers, technical people because they know the latest of what's doing on with the fediverse, and some friends mixed in there.

Teri_Kanefield,

@pjanovsky

I haven't done a follow list for a while. I should probably do another.

Teri_Kanefield, to random

JJ is thankful for walks on the beach and seagulls to chase.

(No he doesn't get empanadas)

Teri_Kanefield, to random

And for our Thanksgiving dinner, we are having homemade Chilean empanadas.

This is not at all unusual if you're Chilean. (My husband is from Chile and he's a good cook.)

Teri_Kanefield,

@kevin

A mixture of beef, onions, olives, raisins and amazing spices.

Teri_Kanefield, (edited )

For people who asked for the recipe, it's a few pages of instructions written in Spanish :)

Here you go.

Legal analysis AND recipes in Spanish.

🎵 Who could ask for anything more? 🎵

(No translation yet, so no description on the images)

Teri_Kanefield,

@chapulin_enojado I uploaded the recipe

Teri_Kanefield,

@strange_child baked

Teri_Kanefield,

@ochaos

Later, when I am not so tired, I may do it.

Teri_Kanefield, (edited )

We have a translation thanks to @FunPoker

Begin here:
https://law-and-politics.online/@FunPoker@masto.nu/111464152160814931

I'll upload a picture of the machine and have my husband go over it and fill in anything missing.

Where the recipe is from: My step-mother-in-law was a professional baker in Chile and handwrote the recipe. She is in her mid-eighties and still bakes Chilean delicacies.

Teri_Kanefield,

@DrAHM @FunPoker

Me too.

Teri_Kanefield,

@FunPoker @FuckElon @Alamari

My husband said he'll go over all of this when he can.

Chilean Spanish can be quirky.

Teri_Kanefield, to random

This is a fabulous (and very long) article explaining the Supreme Court's centuries-old struggle to distinguish incendiary speech that must be protected from speech that must be outlawed.

https://texaslawreview.org/the-second-founding-and-the-first-amendment/

The tieback to the outlawing of the speech of those enslaved and the incendiary speech of the abolitionists on the grounds that their speech was dangerous is quite interesting.

I spent the morning struggling to digest it.🤓

Teri_Kanefield, (edited )

Karen Turley @KarenTurley wants my Cliff Notes.

These two paragraphs are not fair to the article, which goes into slave narratives and the suppression of the speech of those enslaved, and the overlap between the First and Fourteenth Amendments, but pulled out what I needed.

Teri_Kanefield,

@natalie_perret Courts have been wondering how and where to draw the line for centuries.

Sarahp, to random
@Sarahp@mastodon.social avatar

Mastodon tackles the problem of ‘reply guys’ with its latest feature: https://techcrunch.com/2023/11/22/mastodon-tackles-the-problem-of-reply-guys-with-its-latest-feature/

Teri_Kanefield,

@Nona1 @Sarahp @GottaLaff

But if I didn't have those guys to explain the law to me, how would I manage? 😂

Teri_Kanefield, to random

A few thoughts about today's oral arguments in the DC Trump- Gag order case.

But first, a word about appellate arguments in general.

You don't listen to the arguments to find out what the parties will argue. You already know that from the briefing.

You listen to to see what the court asks as a clue to what the court is thinking.

Similarly, when you argue on appeal, you can tell from the questions what the court is thinking and it's your last chance to change their minds.

1/

Teri_Kanefield,

@artildawn

As far as I know, "stochastic" speech as a term has no place in the law.

The standard is given in Brandenburg.

Teri_Kanefield, to random

The problem is this: We are currently in an information disruption.

The way people are getting their information is creating misinformation-rage cycles.

It seems to me that these cycles will not end until we work our way out of this disruption.

The last major information disruption was the printing press and it caused havoc.

The firehose of rage is the result of two things: how people get their information and the complexity of our legal system.

I've been writing about this.

Teri_Kanefield,

@NMBA I’m not sure. FDR also did his fireside chats. I don’t think that equalled the disruption of the printing press.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •