Nonilex, to Energy
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

#GiftArticle

#Trump plans to claim sweeping #authority over #federal #spending
In a 2nd term, Trump will look at unilateral funding cuts for the #WHO & #green #energy initiatives. He is vowing to wrest key spending powers from #Congress & to assert more control over the federal #budget than any president in #US #history.

#law #Constitution #SCOTUS #power #government #extortion #EconomicPolicy #MafiaState #authoritarianism #autocracy #tyranny #democracy #BidenHarris2024
https://wapo.st/3XekhX4

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

That pledge could provoke a dramatic showdown, w/vast consequences for how the govt operates. If returns to office, these efforts are likely to turn typically arcane debates over “ — or the president’s right to stop certain spending programs— into a major political flash point, as he seeks to accomplish via what he cannot pass through .

br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
paninid, to Cybersecurity
@paninid@mastodon.world avatar
indivisibleteam, to random
@indivisibleteam@mastodon.social avatar

🚨 Donald Trump can receive classified intelligence briefings as the winner of the GOP nomination.

But he's facing criminal charges for mishandling classified documents. He withheld foreign aid from Ukraine over baseless conspiracy theories. He told Russian officials about a classified intelligence operation.

Trump is a security threat who can't be trusted. Add your name if you agree: https://act.indivisible.org/sign/deny-trump-classified-briefings?source=mastodon&medium=directpost

MugsysRapSheet,
@MugsysRapSheet@mastodon.social avatar

@indivisibleteam
There's no #Constitutional requirement that the opposing Party's nominee receive intel briefings.

I remind everyone that EVEN AFTER WINNING, the T**** WH didn't even allow in the #Biden Transition Team, and never notified him that they had agreed to a full withdrawal from #Afghanistan in just two months after taking office, leaving them with no plan & no time to develop one. 🤬

So there's no chance a guy who wouldn't be trusted with the keys to a Pizza Hut will get intel.

msquebanh, to LosAngeles
@msquebanh@mastodon.sdf.org avatar

There have been efforts to people who live on the streets in the .
Supreme Court judges are due to rule on whether a law that essentially makes being a crime, is .

The ruling could affect the lives of more than half a million people.

Al Jazeera’s Rob Reynolds reports from .

https://youtu.be/aeCgyyfDopI?si=jrFaRi0oK-PQZzlj

Nonilex, to Colorado
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Cowardly Justices Appear Skeptical of Arguments to Kick Off State Ballots

The heard arguments about whether TFG’s attempts to subvert the him from again holding office. Justices across the ideological spectrum questioned several aspects of a ruling from the Supreme Court.


https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/02/08/us/trump-supreme-court-colorado-ballot?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

#Trump’s atty argued that the #Jan6 attack was a “riot,” not an #insurrection & said the #constitutional provision in question doesn’t even apply to the #president. He also argued #Congress would have to pass specific #legislation authorizing states to bar candidates from the #ballot. (No. The #14thAmendment already establishes the #law)

Some of the justices expressed skepticism toward those claims, suggesting that Trump’s lawyer was trying to parse the letter of the law beyond reason.
#law

skykiss, (edited ) to MIguns
@skykiss@sfba.social avatar

"Section 3 was enacted for such a time as this, and for such a figure as Trump."

Our #Constitution gives us tools to protect against those who undermine our democracy, and we must use them.

Civil rights lawyer Sherrilyn Ifill writes in a powerful amicus brief to #scotus in Trump v. Anderson, the case that may determine whether Donald Trump would be eligible to hold office.

#Section3 of the #14th Amendment is the #constitutional provision at the heart of the appeal before the justices. Oral arguments are set for next Thursday.

This section bans insurrectionists from office who previously swore to support the Constitution, isn’t a “historical relic” but rather was “designed to ensure that the ambitious rights that the 14th Amendment guarantees can withstand the resistance that its framers knew was sure to recur — not just in the immediate post-War period, but far into the future.

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/trump-supreme-court-ballot-sherrilyn-ifill-rcna136819

#Democracy #law #justice #America

MugsysRapSheet, to random
@MugsysRapSheet@mastodon.social avatar

#Republicans are quite clear about the fact people have a #Constitutional right to own a gun, but NOT a Constitutional #Right to #Vote.

Ergo, I believe that IF YOU SEND A DEATH THREAT TO AN ELECTED OFFICIAL, YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE SHOULD BE TAKEN AWAY!

DEATH THREATS ARE A CRIME.

And in MANY states, people convicted of a felony have their right to vote PERMANENTLY taken away, so it's not like this is an extreme concept. (Trump is KNOWINGLY stoking violence & Death Threats.) https://www.msnbc.com/alex-wagner-tonight/watch/trump-mainstreams-political-violence-with-normalizing-repetition-201885765596

Peternimmo, to Scotland
@Peternimmo@mastodon.scot avatar

"Current analysis, particularly outside #Scotland, mistakenly suggests that the movement toward Scotland’s independence will somehow be over if one #election is lost. Nothing could be less true. If we step back from short-term electoral calculations and take a long view of #constitutional change in Scotland, it seems to be headed in only one direction: #independence."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/08/scotland-independence-snp-yes-vote-referendum

KlausGerdGiesen, to italy

With a change, 's "wants to automatically give the with the highest percentage of a 55% share of seats in .In other words, as long as one party receives more votes than any other — even if that were, say, 20% of the vote — it will be rewarded with outright parliamentary ."
Of course,it's pure that Meloni's is likely to be that party after the next ...

https://www.politico.eu/article/melonis-dangerous-constitutional-change-in-italy/

Nonilex, to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar
br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
skykiss, to Michigan
@skykiss@sfba.social avatar

Failed republican lawmakers are suing #Michigan to block #state #constitutional amendment to #reproductive #rights, a ballot initiative approved by voters, arguing voters can’t create new rights. They fail to understand the basic concepts of democracy.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2023/11/08/Michigan-GOP-abortion-rights-suit/2071699472193/

swissmfa, to random

Today, we celebrate #InternationalDayofDemocracy! 🎉

This day is an opportunity to recommit to our shared #democratic values & remember that democracy is a constant and ongoing process.

🇨🇭 has a unique #constitutional mandate to protect and support #democracy across the 🌍:

YusufToropov, to legal
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar

A superb overview from #BrianTaylorCohen of the current state of play in the #disqualification discussion in US #legal circles.

QUICK SUMMARY: PREVAILING VIEW OF THE MOST RESPECTED CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL #CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLARS IS THAT #TRUMP IS DISQUALIFIED, RIGHT NOW, TO BE ON THE BALLOT IN ANY STATE, VIA #FourteenthAmendment.

Whether he's convicted of any crime=irrelevant. He's as unqualified as if he were, say, born in Africa.

#14thAmendment #Constitution

https://youtu.be/6QeguuZbeE0?si=YyDSxcgUetbttNLC

br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
br00t4c, to conservative
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
Susan_Larson_TN, to Marriage
@Susan_Larson_TN@mastodon.online avatar
cmorris, to random
@cmorris@mastodon.social avatar

Giving Peace a Chance: Pushing Back on a Chilling Russian Censorship Law | Catherine Morris & Lauren McCarthy, Slaw

#Russia is using the law as a weapon against its own citizens to silence all criticism of its…aggression against #Ukraine… One Russian human rights organization, OVD-info, is pushing back…[with] a battery of complaints to the Russian #Constitutional Court. …Int’l human rights org’s & legal scholars…are preparing…#AmicusCuriae briefs…” https://www.slaw.ca/2023/05/23/giving-peace-a-chance-pushing-back-on-a-chilling-russian-censorship-law/ #WeaponizingLaw

AnneTheWriter1, to random

My home city of #AuroraIllinois tried to back out of their contract to hold a #PrideParade in 2022, because parade organizers had asked officers in the parade route to not wear their uniforms. Some #BlueLivesMatter feelings were hurt, so a lot of officers tried to back out of providing security for the event (they were being paid overtime to provide the security).

With too few officers agreeing to provide security for overtime, the parade faced cancellation. After a great deal of local uproar in support of the parade, things were worked out last-minute. But the questions raised by the disagreement have since gone on to be a Federal Court case.

On Friday, a Federal Judge ruled temporarily in favor of the #Pride group hosting the event, saying that sections of the City's permit process likely violates the #Constitution. This ruling now allows this year's parade to go definitively forward.

#GayPride #LGBTQ #Constitutional #Lawsuit #Parades #LGBTQIA #LGBTQpride

https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20230519/parts-of-aurora-parade-permit-law-likely-unconstitutional-federal-judge-says-in-gay-pride-event-suit

CarolineMalaCorbin, to random

Hello!

I am a #constitutional law #professor who specializes in #speech, #religion, and women's rights.

I look at the First Amendment through an equality lens.

My latest article argues that public school teachers do NOT have a free speech right to misgender students: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4284105

Today I am working on a symposium piece about religious liberty challenges to #abortion bans.

#Introductions #intro #lawprof #conlaw #law #establishment #CRT #FirstAmendment #equality #LGBTQ #Lawfedi

br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar

Missouri voters to decide on first constitutional amendment to prohibit ranked-choice voting (RCV)

#constitutional

https://news.ballotpedia.org/2024/05/23/missouri-voters-to-decide-on-first-constitutional-amendment-to-prohibit-ranked-choice-voting-rcv/

br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • osvaldo12
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • everett
  • tester
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines