dougiec3, to random
@dougiec3@libretooth.gr avatar

This is the same Bible that condones slavery.
"Religious traditionalists, particularly those among the Southern Baptist Convention, also opposed the federal government’s support for equality, although they got less press in the early years of that expansion. In their view, the Bible laid out hierarchical social arrangements, especially patriarchy. Government defense of women’s equality was a direct assault on their worldview."
https://open.substack.com/pub/heathercoxrichardson/p/may-16-2024?r=63j6s&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
GottaLaff, to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via Josh Gerstein:

JUST IN: won't review insurrection clause case brought by former NM County Commissioner Couy Griffin, who was convicted in connection with . He was kicked out of office by a judge and made similar arguments to those Trump prevailed on.

Wileymiller,
@Wileymiller@mastodon.social avatar

@GottaLaff
Sooooo... is saying the applies to everyone else EXCEPT Donald Trump, right? I guess this is their ersatz ruling that he does have total immunity.

YusufToropov, to legal
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar

Under-discussed #legal time bomb waiting to go off in #SCOTUS decision about #Colorado #ballot access for Orange Guy. (Via electoral-vote.com)

If this part of the #14thAmendment requires #enabling #legislation from #Congress ... EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT NOW DOES TOO, RIGHT?

The #chaos the #US is about to experience is brought to you by five #conservative #SupremeCourt justices appointed by #Republican presidents.

Vote #Democrat.
#ExcellentPresident #BidenHarris2024

Nonilex, to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

One section…stands out from ’s decision in v. Anderson.
“Even though ‘all 9 Members of the Court’ agree that this independent & sufficient rationale resolves this case,” Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan & Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in their concurrence, “5 Justices go on.”

& then the key part: “They decide novel constitutional questions to insulate this Court & petitioner from future controversy.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/05/conspicuous-line-trump-supreme-courts-left-flank/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

To recap the decision: The 5 majority justices ruled not just that states can’t #disqualify #Trump#Colorado, in this case — but that the #insurrection clause of the #14thAmendment can’t be enforced against a #federal candidate w/o #Congress laying out a process. It raised the bar significantly for Trump or anyone else ever being disqualified, particularly given how gridlocked Congress is.
#SCOTUS #law #ActivistCourt #PartisanCourt

jeffowski, to random
@jeffowski@mastodon.world avatar

https://youtu.be/SsIQ1VdM6Ec
Let's talk about Trump, SCOTUS, and the 14th Amendment....
@beautfc
#MAGA #14thAmendment #scotus

Nonilex, to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

enshrines

…the high court will do anything it can to hand the fmr -in-chief the keys to the . Today it struck again.

I mean, who among us hasn’t insurrected? It happens to a lot of guys. It’s not a big deal.

;

https://open.substack.com/pub/anandwrites/p/supreme-court-impunity-colorado-ballot?r=dikz2&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

That appears to be the attitude of the of the , which for the 2nd time in a wk did nothing to dispel the notion that it is the -bought of , committed to doing literally anything to elect him.

…this morning ruled — per curiam, meaning the whole court, not just the majority — that Trump can remain on the ballot in .

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

had tried to disqualify him on the grounds that the to the , for reasons of history & prudence, bars insurrectionists from office.
Today’s decision overruling CO’s decision was made on the grounds that the Constitution makes solely responsible for enforcing §3 of the , not the states. Which is funny, because the court is dominated by ideologues who normally love .

christianschwaegerl, to random
@christianschwaegerl@mastodon.social avatar

The US Supreme Court effectively nullified the #14thamendment today and paved the way for any insurrectionist to become president – as US Congress will never agree on rules how to enact the constitution, something the majority of judges defined as a condition for banning a candidate in its ruling.

A great day for #Trump, i.e. a black day for #democracy. #scotus

GottaLaff, to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via Kyle Griffin:

CREW President Noah Bookbinder: "While the Supreme Court allowed Donald back on the ballot on technical legal grounds, this was in no way a win for Trump. The Supreme Court had the opportunity in this case to exonerate Trump, and they chose not to do so."

Nonilex, to Colorado
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

forced the state of to keep on the presidential after the state’s Supreme Court found that the ’s Clause barred him from running for office.

The court issued its ruling in a unanimous, per curiam order.


https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/scotus-rules-constitutions-dq-clause-cant-keep-trump-off-ballot

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

In a relatively brief, 13 pg opinion, accompanied by one concurrence from Justice & another from the 3 on the bench, the court decided that the leaves the question of ’s disqualification to . [bullshit]

“Responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders & candidates rests w/Congress & not the States,” the Court ruled.


Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The ruling brings one of the most prominent efforts to hold accountable for his attempt to stay in after losing the to an end. , in oral arguments & in its Monday opinion, went out of its way to dodge the question of whether that attempt — which culminated in the storming of — constituted an .


https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf

Nonilex, (edited )
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Instead, the opinion focuses on a threshold question which all but ensures that the #Disqualification Clause will remain a dead letter, at least as applied to #Trump’s 2020 #coup attempt. The justices focused instead on whose job it is to enforce §3 of the #14thAmendment, neatly excluding themselves from the equation. Instead, they kicked the issue of who should bar those who have taken an oath to the #Constitution & then engaged in #insurrection from holding office to #Congress.

#law #SCOTUS

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

In so doing, the Court set up a new rule which extends beyond : that , & not the states, is responsible for enforcing
against federal officeholders & candidates. To do that, the majority held, Congress MUST act.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

#SCOTUS has now put the decision in the hands of people like #JimJordan, #MikeJohnson, #JimComer, #EliseStefanik, #MarjorieTaylorGreen, #MattGaetz, #LaurenBoebert, #AndyBiggs, #PaulGosar, #ScottPerry, #BarryLoudermilk, & others many of whom actively participated in #Trump’s #coup attempt & the #Jan6 #insurrection. Were they to enforce §3 of the #14thAmendment they would be disqualified for office themselves.

#HouseRepublicans #Congress #legislation #disqualification #14A #law #legal

iuculano, to america
@iuculano@masto.ai avatar

Pssst..

Let me be blunt

The Court of the of is a and, by logical extension, a .

Think about it..
Why do decisions favoring come in quickly, while those against him seemingly take forever?


GottaLaff, (edited ) to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

1/… As expected

And it was UNANIMOUS

#BREAKING Supreme Court rules Trump cannot be kicked off Colorado ballot #SCOTUS #14thAmendment #legal https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-trump-cannot-kicked-colorado-ballot-rcna132291

NewsDesk, to USpolitics
@NewsDesk@flipboard.social avatar

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to resolve a dispute today over states' ability to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

ABC News reports: https://flip.it/pnSleo

#Trump #SupremeCourt #USPolitics #Politics #14thAmendment #News

Nonilex, to Colorado
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

to post a decision Mon, possibly on access?
The is set to announce ≥1 opinion AM, leading to speculation the justices could rule on Trump’s eligibility for the ballot the day before — when presidential primary are held in that state & >12 others.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/03/trump-colorado-ballot-supreme-court-decision/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

took the unusual step Sunday of scheduling an opinion announcement for a day when it is not in session. The justices typically issue rulings from the bench, w/the author of the majority opinion presenting a summary of the court’s decision. Instead, the court said opinions could be posted on its website Mon at 10AM.

GottaLaff, to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

📌👀 Via Josh Gerstein:

JUST IN: #SCOTUS sets unusual, short-notice opinion release for Monday morning. Appears to signal that ruling on #Trump ballot eligibility is looming. #14thAmendment #legal

GottaLaff, to Arizona
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

🤦🏻‍♀️ "#Arizona Senate Passes Bill Preventing Presidents From Ballot Removal Under #14thAmendment

As states eagerly await the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on if #Trump should be allowed on the ballot for supporting an insurrection, Arizona Republicans took the first step on Monday to ensure Trump won’t be removed from their state’s ballot"

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/arizona-senate-passes-bill-preventing-presidents-from-ballot-removal-under-14th-amendment/

Nonilex, to Illinois
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

#Illinois judge says #14thAmendment bars #Trump from #2024 primary #ballot

#SCOTUS is currently considering the broader dispute.

A judge in Cook County, IL, on Wed ruled that §3 of the 14th Amendment, aka the "#InsurrectionClause," bars Trump from the 2024 Republican primary ballot.

The order overrules a Jan determination from the IL BOE that Trump could remain #eligible.

#law #legal #politics #Jan6 #Insurrection #democracy #Constitution
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/illinois-judge-14th-amendment-bars-trump-2024-primary/story?id=107657552

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

FYI, #Illinois is now the third state to rule #Trump did in fact take part in an #insurrection thus requiring them to remove his name from the #ballot under §3 of the #14thAmendment of the #UnitedStates #Constitution.

The other 2 states are #Colorado & #Maine.

#law #legal #Jan6 #Election #2024Election #VoteBlue #BidenHarris2024

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • tester
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • normalnudes
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • love
  • cubers
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines