At once delighted, overwhelmed, and humbled to receive, along with my colleagues Susan Landau and @SteveBellovin , the 2023 Usenix Association Lifetime Achievement Award, citing work bridging technology and public policy. Thank you!
The recent survey confirmed what many people think: men prefer to pee standing – is that the best way?
Some people view standing to pee as “superior” and sitting inferior, write @PhysiologyWith + @cphelps99 (@BondUniversity), but habits may be changing. https://t.co/pHMkzPTRXf
@mekkaokereke@carnage4life Good points, well made but it’s good not to minimise the damage and even minimal influence on an election like the US presidential election is huge imo
@mekkaokereke@carnage4life Zero reservation about what you say re voter suppression and generally racialised systems. No reservations around the massively inflammatory media climate.
My point goes to principle and however small the influence the fact of company data being deployed to partisan ends (however ethically or unethically that data was harvested or/and supplied) is imo significant in itself.
As for fog lifting, we’re not talking about faolks being bewitched. We are talking about folks’ predjudices and uncertaincies being deliberatly and skillfully directed to a particular end. I’m not a psychologist but believe it is nothing so simple as to be dismissed as you have done here.
@mekkaokereke@carnage4life I can’t (nor do I wish to) counter any of this. But I would point out that CA exploited and inflamed anti-balckness and generic xenophobic tendencies with disturbing skill and potency.
@mekkaokereke@carnage4life Not saying you’re wrong but Trump won by a small margin on a technicality. Excise CA from that equation and he may well’ve lost.
Meanwhile, the principle still stands. Personal data hoarded by tech corps can be deployed for social engineering to good effect by the highest bidder. That it was only marginally successful (or minimally impactful) in these two cases is not really the point. These were rookie deployments of resources that are still yet to be adequately understood as to what implications may suggest were they to be plundered, sold or surrendered to a truly motivated malign entity.
I hear what you say about the greater danger, the chronic condition of generic bigotry and anti-black prejudice that to a large degree made it all possible. The more powerful the tools the more acute these underlying diseases become imo.
Thanks for your time. I always find your contributions challenging and compelling.
@georgeeyong@mekkaokereke@carnage4life Mekka will have far more thorough knowledge than me (and I realise the question was not directed at me) but three recent books if you’re looking for reading material
One Person, No Vote: How Voter Suppression Is Destroying Our Democracy by Carol Anderson
Voter Suppression in U.S. Elections by Kevin Kruse
Uncounted: The Crisis of Voter Suppression in America by Gilda Daniels
@stib I actually believe that were this to happen (ABC and SBS running public instances) it would improve the standard of their journalism.
They’d be on the rockface of exactly what people are thinking and how they’re expressing it, they’d need to learn what works and doesn’t in moderation.
It’s moderating an instance that’d sharpen their sense of civic responsibility and ethical obligations to the culture broadly.
Can’t wait for the Supreme Court to rule in the opposite direction when it’s a Muslim stadium worker who doesn’t want to be around hot dogs and beer for religious reasons.
@olavf@carnage4life Alito could’ve ruled on merit. Seems like the issue is that an activistically conservative Christian SC are making allowances for Christian complaints.
The point (as I understand it) is that it appears quite unlikely the same court might be similarly motivated in the case of a Muslim complainant.
@olavf Alito could’ve ruled on merit. Seems like the issue is that an activistically conservative Christian SC are making allowances for Christian complaints.
The point (as I understand it) is that it appears quite unlikely the same court might be similarly motivated in the case of a Muslim complainant.
@olavf That, for me, is where your particular inclinations lie. Are you prepared to believe this court would show a similar interest in the sanctity of Muslim beliefs? I’m sceptical.