Fun fact: "The Tragedy Of the Commons" is a hoax created by the white nationalist Garrett Hardin to justify stealing land from colonized people and moving it from collective ownership, "rescuing" it from the inevitable tragedy by putting it in the hands of a private owner, who will care for it properly, thanks to "rational self-interest":
I love this coining of “economism” for the way it connotes religious belief in the tenets of economics. I’d like to read the essay that ties economism to extractive capitalism.
Is there an Airbnb equivalent for non-Tesla electric vehicles?
Use case: I’m driving an EV cross-country. I need to recharge. I open an app that shows me nearby residences or businesses who will let me hook my car to their charger for five or ten bucks or whatever.
Note, I am not asking whether Airbnb has listings that include charging. They do.
I’m talking about somebody who’d want to locate non-Tesla charging while traveling far from home.
“These emails tell a dramatic story about how Google’s finance and advertising teams, led by Raghavan with the blessing of CEO Sundar Pichai, actively worked to make Google worse to make the company more money.” https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/
When I worked in a St. Louis advertising agency in the 1990s, I would phone the city library’s reference desk for fact checks and arcana. The man who took the calls clearly loved it. He’d spring into action like Batman responding to the Bat-Signal. For instance, let’s say I wanted the spelling of “Bat-Signal.” One word? Two? Hyphenated? Dude would put me on hold and respond with the answer in minutes. Cited sources and everything. A wonder.
I collect distinctions between liberals and conservatives. I loved this one from Steven Brust by way of Cory Doctorow:
“‘Left’ and ‘right’ mean the same thing today that they’ve meant since the French Revolution. Ask someone, ‘What’s more important: property rights, or human rights?’ If they answer: ‘Property rights are human rights,’ they are on the right.”
As I understand what I’ve seen called The Hard Problem, it falls into two camps: One says consciousness is an epiphenomenon of neural activity, and the other says consciousness is the transcendent substrate of creation. Is that a fair way to describe it?
Corporate crime is notoriously underpoliced and underprosecuted. Mostly, that's because we just choose not to do anything about it. American corporations commit crimes at 20X the rate of real humans, and their crimes are far worse than any crime committed by a human, but they are almost never prosecuted:
I’ve long wanted Marvel to create a crime-fighting character who defeats white-collar criminals. But this essay makes me realize this as-yet uncreated character could plow richer ground fighting corporate crime. Give a franchise built around Michael Claytons.
Another all too barren spring in NYC. There should be so many insects, so many ants, so many tiny creatures filling the parks, hitting the windshields of cars.
Remember when bugs used to hit the windshields of cars because the air was so full of life?
I guess most people think this is 'improvement' but they are wrong. There is a campaign to put the American bumblebee on the endangered species list!
We are living in an eerie lifeless netherworld and I don't know why more can't see it!
I hate getting old because if you pay attention then you see that the same lies being repeated over and over again to new audiences. Those audiences sit there rapt, as if everything they hear is new.
I’m on a catch-up call with a middle-school buddy. He mentions his grandchildren are homeschooling. I can’t just leave it. I ask why. He says it started with covid. Fair enough.
Then he adds that public schools have enacted liberal policies that permit a boy, if he’s feeling feminine that day, to use the girls’ room.
I suspect a conservative’s resistance to change is not to the change per se, because they always mischaracterize it. They invent nonsense, which they of course reject.
Capitalism guides actions today as the Church guided actions in the European Middle Ages. And just as moveable type facilitated the Church’s replacement by capitalism, social media are facilitating capitalism’s replacement. But it’s yet unclear what will replace capitalism. Just as Christianity continued into the age of capitalism, capitalism will continue into the age of what’s coming next. But capitalism will be secondary. And it may be reformed.
When I see someone in tech, who is otherwise quite critical and sceptically-minded, give some tech execs the benefit of the doubt to a surprisingly great degree, they almost always turn out to have spent time with said exec in person
This isn’t a question of being biased in favour of your friends. Sometimes we’re only talking about days or even hours of time
The problem is narcissists and sociopaths are fucking charming—as long as they think you have value.
if you hit "Ctrl+K" in Powerpoint, to insert a hyperlink, you get this delightful mix of 90s and 2010s design that I assume everyone at Microsoft is afraid to touch
It's not even: "I don't use this, so why should I pay taxes for it?"
It's: "I am completely unaware of the tremendous, heroic efforts that are required on a day-to-day basis to keep civilization running, and me personally safe, healthy, and comfortable, and I refuse to educate myself on the subject - so why should I pay taxes for it?"
The machinery of civilization is becoming ever more complex, yet people are still crying out for "simple solutions", as if there is such a thing anywhere outside of the fevered imaginations of populists.
“We find tax cuts for the rich lead to higher income inequality in both the short- and medium-term. In contrast, such reforms do not have any significant effect on economic growth or unemployment. Our results therefore provide strong evidence against the influential political–economic idea that tax cuts for the rich ‘trickle down’ to boost the wider economy.”
Ask ChatGPT "What is" a penis, a clitoris, a g spot, a labia, a scrotum, a vulva, etc. Every anatomical term relating to a man results in an answer, and every term relating to a woman yields an answer that is quickly replaced with "this content may violate our content policy." Lady parts are bad, mmkay!?
When the effects of populism turn up in your family it’s especially scary. I shared a fact check by the Fraunhofer Institute on claims by a conservative/right CSU politician on a German TV show here yesterday. I also sent it to a family group. Afterwards a family member called me and we had a pretty long, interesting conversation about that show and the fact check.
Enshittification isn’t things that were not shit becoming shit; they were always shit, you just didn’t feel it.
Surveillance capitalism isn’t some horrible corruption of capitalism, it’s just capitalism in the age of the ubiquitous digital network.
The problem isn’t things that were good becoming bad. The problem is things that have always been bad finally negatively affecting even those with bucketloads of privilege who are now attempting to explain away why they were ok with it all before.
Benefit corporations—B corps—are required to consider their larger stakeholder communities. This, as opposed to the typical C corp structure that benefits only owners.
Related, I’ve encountered small and mid-size businesses that look after employees, vendors, customers, and communities. I imagine they do so because the owners work and live shoulder-to-shoulder with those stakeholders.
Mr. Lövsund has exited this exchange, but I feel compelled to accede to his point as I expand the context of the discussion. Yes, capitalism is bad, for it’s like nuclear power, capable of generating enormous energy as it consumes everything in its orbit. It needs control rods. What are the control rods of capitalism? They’re government. Forgive my preaching, but we the people must manage capitalism lest it destroy us.
This is Handmaid’s Tale stuff. We are the dystopia now.
I remember when even anti-abortion politicians were careful to say they would never criminalize the pregnant women. Now Nebraska is imprisoning a mother who helped her teenage daughter with an abortion pill.
Sorry I can’t cite the social post where I first read this, but someone observed that heck yes conservatives will indict women who terminate pregnancies, because women tend to vote for Democrats, and conservatives like to disenfranchise Democratic voters by convicting them of felonies.
The majority of Americans continue to support Ukraine, want the US government to continue military and financial aid to Ukraine, recognize that Russia has genocidal policies in Ukraine and want Ukraine to defeat Russia.
TV people! Please stop asking Zelensky (and me, and everyone else) about what happens when Americans will "get tired" of Ukraine, and ask them instead to explain why support for Ukraine continues to hold, which is more interesting and rather remarkable
As usual, Timothy Snyder nailed the issue in his most recent podcast, in which he reviewed 10 reasons to be thankful to Ukraine. I wonder what sorts of questions TV producers would formulate if they first spent 15 minutes with this information?