Encore une fois, l’Europe s’enfonce dans la dérive sécuritaire avec la France en première de cordée. Le silence et la complaisance sont le comburant d’une ère totalitariste en puissance.
There's an error: stopkiller.ai incorrectly says that social credit score AIs are banned under the EU #ArtificialIntelligenceAct . That was the case in early versions; the final version includes lots of loopholes added by the European Council (EU govts).
Social credit score AIs are allowed under the act if they are "for a specific purpose" under national or EU law [1].
"If you use a cloud app, your data is being collected & processed for use in #AI. What happens after that? We don't know, but it'd be crazy to assume you'll not be harmed in some way."
-R McNamee
@eff It's absolutely crazy that laws that were made for an age where to wiretap someone you needed to actual tap a wire are still in effect to this day.
🇮🇱 Spying, hacking and intimidation: Israel’s nine-year ‘war’ on the ICC exposed | @guardian
"On 16 January 2015, within weeks of Palestine joining, Bensouda opened a preliminary examination into what in the legalese of the court was called “the situation in Palestine”. The following month, two men who had managed to obtain the prosecutor’s private address turned up at her home in The Hague.."
@jbzfn@guardian
“One of them said Khan had indicated that a request for arrest warrants of Israeli leaders could be imminent, but warned he was “under tremendous pressure from the United States”. “
> Rediffusé jusqu'au 31/08/2024Comment protéger ses activités numériques de la surveillance et de la malveillance ? Un panorama didactique des solutions altern...
@Flux@aral yeah that’s my take too and i used to work on this kindnof tech (before i knew better). I think it may be technically true but i think it’s very unlikely that it’s meaningfully true and i’d bet a paycheck it wasn’t done with any of the explicit intent the article implies.
Also any disabled person caught in this ALSO searched for disability stuff on google AND viewed disability sites with their trackers.
@Flux@aral i’m not trying to defend google OR the dystopian state of tracking but the whole thing feels completely hypocritical and ignorant of how any of this works
Lets say, I have a Teams call with someone who uses Windows, and has Windows Recall enabled. Am I going to be recorded by it on the other end? Am I going to be warned about this feature being on? Can I opt out? How does it affect my privacy? Is this in any way legal in the EU? What happens with calls between US and EU? Which legislation applies?
#EU#Poland#Surveillance#Privacy: "The case Pietrzak and Bychawska-Siniarska and Others v. Poland (applications nos. 72038/17 and 25237/18) concerned a complaint by five Polish nationals about Polish legislation authorising a secret-surveillance regime covering both operational control and the retention of telecommunications, postal and digital communications data (“communications data”) for possible future use by the relevant national authorities. In particular, they alleged that there was no remedy available under domestic law allowing persons who believed that they had been subjected to secret surveillance to complain about that fact and to have its lawfulness reviewed.
In today’s Chamber judgment in this case the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been three violations of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life and correspondence) of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of the complaints concerning the operational-control regime, the retention of communications data for potential use by the relevant national authorities, and the secret-surveillance regime under the Anti-Terrorism Act.
Given the secret nature and wide scope of the measures provided for by the Polish legislation and the lack of effective review by which persons who believed that they had been subjected to surveillance could challenge this alleged surveillance, the Court found it appropriate to examine the legislation at issue in abstracto. It considered that the applicants could claim to be the victims of a violation of the Convention, and that the mere existence of the relevant legislation constituted in
itself an interference with their Article 8 rights.
The Court then held that all the shortcomings identified by it in the operational-control regime led to a conclusion that the national legislation did not provide sufficient safeguards against excessive recourse to surveillance..."
1/2 📌 "Are you old enough to buy this?"This is the presentation's title of NGI TALER's partner @oec
who will speak this Friday 31/5, at the event #Security in Times of #Surveillance organised by @Ei_PSI (Ei/Ψ) in the Blauwe Zaal at @TUEindhoven
🔦We are super excited that the coordinators of NGI TALER, Prof. Tanja Lange and Heloise Vieira, are part of the local organizers of this event, and have put together this stellar lineup of speakers!
Created this after reading conversation in comments below some tech article somewhere. Someone mentioned "surfing the #internet sewer" and I really liked that phrase.