@chrisgeidner@journa.host
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

chrisgeidner

@chrisgeidner@journa.host

It’s me. SCOTUS, law & politics — including LGBTQ, post-Roe, criminal law, and democracy issues — at Law Dork. / Sober. Queer. Bipolar. Buckeye. Theater. Runner. Gaymer.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Over the long weekend, I’ve published two posts: a look into the Post’s Alito story and a video discussing this June at SCOTUS.

Subscribe to Law Dork's free newsletters to keep up. https://www.lawdork.com/

If you can, become a paid subscriber: https://www.lawdork.com/subscribe

Thanks, and be well.

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Last Sunday, I published my exclusive about Alito's beer stock sales. Since then, I've had important reports out of Alabama, Congress, and SCOTUS, along with some SCOTUS and media analysis. And we're not even in June yet.

Subscribe to Law Dork now: https://www.lawdork.com/

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

On Saturday, the Washington Post revealed that it had known about the Alito upside-down flag but had not reported it.

The revelation raises many questions. I went into them over at Law Dork. https://www.lawdork.com/p/washington-post-bombshell-washington

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

I cannot get over how many times in recent years the Washington Post had to decide not to share that they knew the Alito household flew an upside-down flag in the immediate aftermath of Jan 6 before reporting it today. https://www.lawdork.com/p/washington-post-bombshell-washington

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Saturday's Washington Post report raises many questions — several relating to the fact that the Post, at least passively, made the decision not to reveal the (first) Alito flag story many times since 2021. https://www.lawdork.com/p/washington-post-bombshell-washington

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

BREAKING: Sens. Durbin, Whitehouse request meeting with Chief Justice Roberts over Alito ethics scandal, call for Alito’s recusal in Jan. 6 cases. https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024-05-23-Letter-to-CJ-Roberts.pdf

image/jpeg

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar
chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Justice Sam Alito — fresh off the latest report of his apparent support for insurrectionists — wrote the court’s majority opinion Thursday, severely limiting the power of the Civil War Amendments to protect voters from lawmakers’ racial gerrymanders. https://www.lawdork.com/p/the-roberts-court-conservatives-erode

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

The next five weeks are going to include a lot coming out of the Supreme Court — and the other courts aren’t going to stop, either. Subscribe to Law Dork now to support my independent legal journalism and keep up with the news. https://www.lawdork.com/

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

NEW: What happened at SCOTUS today in the South Carolina racial gerrymandering case decision? A lot — but the bottom line is that this is another step in the Roberts Court's long-term project to erode voting rights protections.

Tonight, at Law Dork: https://www.lawdork.com/p/the-roberts-court-conservatives-erode

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

OK, I'm at SCOTUS, where we're expecting one or more opinions in argued cases at 10a. Subscribe to Law Dork now: https://www.lawdork.com/

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

It's a two-box day at SCOTUS, so we're expecting 3-4 opinions (though it, technically, could be two very long opinions).

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

First decision is in Coinbase. Jackson writes for the unanimous court, affirming the Ninth Circuit.

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Breaking: The Supreme Court reverses a district court's ruling that South Carolina's congressional map contained a racial gerrymander. The 6-3 decision is by Alito, along ideological grounds. Thomas concurred in part. Kagan writes the dissent. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-807_3e04.pdf

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

The final decision, also by Alito, is in Brown v. US. The 6-3 decision in an Armed Career Criminal Act application case features a Jackson dissent, joined by Kagan and, in part, Gorsuch. Sotomayor joined the majority. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-6389_6537.pdf

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar
chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

With that, 34 SCOTUS decisions remain, including Trump immunity, mifepristone, administrative agency powers, internet content moderation, EMTALA and abortion care, and more.

Thursday, May 30, is the next scheduled opinion day, as noted on the SCOTUS home page calendar.

Subscribe to Law Dork: https://www.lawdork.com/

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar
chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Sam Alito is a problem.

The real question now is what the court does about it.

If that makes things awkward at the court, so be it. It is more important than that.

At Law Dork. Read and subscribe now: https://www.lawdork.com/p/sam-alito-is-a-problem

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Anyway, Alito and his eight SCOTUS colleagues are due to take the bench in less than 12 hours. They are expected to issue opinions in one or more argued cases.

Subscribe to Law Dork now to keep up: https://www.lawdork.com/

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Justice Sam Alito actually is, to turn the phrase on its head, a politician in robes.

On Alito, Roberts, and the latest crisis his court is facing — whether he likes it or not: https://www.lawdork.com/p/sam-alito-is-a-problem

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Two hundred judges is already two hundred and one, btw. https://www.lawdork.com/p/two-hundred-judges-shadow-docket-bill

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

NEW from me, on Blumenthal's shadow docket bill: "No, it’s not going to become law this year. Yes, it is good that he’s doing it — and is something that Democrats should be doing more of this year, for several reasons."

Check it out: https://www.lawdork.com/p/two-hundred-judges-shadow-docket-bill

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

🚨 We have a SCOTUS shadow docket bill — introduced today by Sen. Dick Blumenthal, with Schumer and Durbin among the co-sponsors. Read the bill at Law Dork: https://www.lawdork.com/p/two-hundred-judges-shadow-docket-bill

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

The Trump appointee overseeing an “unprecedented judicial investigation” into forum-shopping allegations—levied against some of the nation’s top LGBTQ civil rights lawyers—has threatened to jail some of the lawyers involved.

A huge story out of Alabama: https://www.lawdork.com/p/alabama-burke-threatening-jail-lgbtq-lawyers

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines