'Experts studying RTO policies at S&P 500 companies found in-office workers aren't more productive.
Businesses with strict RTO policies aren't more profitable, either, the researchers determined.
But they say controlling managers prefer RTO and use employees as a scapegoat for bad performance.'
@siderea
I don't know what #WFH is, but I think Linux itself should not break when you change a user name. Applications, backups, file sync could break.
It’s wild to me there was a time, just a scant few years ago, where on a week like this, if you weren’t on PTO, you’d be sitting in a near empty office building waiting until some random time of day where you’d feel it was “safe” or “okay” to head home.
With all the battles over return-to-office going on, I’m thankful that, at the very least, the widespread acceptance of tools that allowed more WFH flexibility.
Good point here - forcing people back to offices will impact women more, as success in work is linked by managers to availability (and it's men who are more available for long office hours).
If employers stop people working from home, one group will pay dearly
I got a raisable standing desk for my home office. Every time im standing at it, I feel the need to sing that dumb Elton John song 🎶 I’m Still Standing 🎵 #wfh#standing#desk
"More than two hours a day in meetings is the tipping point at which a majority of workers say they’re spending “too much time” in meetings, with a similar pattern emerging across all job levels."
Wat. People have fewer than 2 hours of meetings a day? 😅
Interesting piece - pointing out that workers save money with WFH, but also that they're setting up work/life boundaries and companies don’t like that.
Getting back to the office comes at a cost, but who will pay?