War oder ist #Greenpeace eine #KriminelleVereinigung? Greenpeace ist ein organisierter ZusammenSchluss von mehr als 2 Menschen mit einer FestLegung von Rollen zur Verfolgung eines übergeordneten gemeinsamen Interesses. Greenpeace hat auch #StrafTaten begannen. Sie haben sogar das "C" einer der achso christlichen Parteien geklaut. Greenpeace wurde nie als "Kriminielle Vereinigung" gesehen. Warum sollte die @AufstandLastGen eine Kriminelle Vereinigung sein? 1/2
Did you know that #Greenpeace still spends significant resources on fighting life-saving projects such as Golden Rice?
Vitamin A deficiency is a serious health problem in developing countries in Asia and Africa, causing an estimated 250,000 to 500,000 cases of blindness in young children every year. The World Health Organisation estimates that half of these children die within 12 months of losing their sight. Malnutrition rates vary. In the Philippines, 17 per cent of children under six are Vitamin A deficient, while in Bangladesh the rate is about 20 per cent.
In #Germany debate escalates about whether the #nuclear phase-out was justified granted its consequences for German economy that are becoming evident now. In the new turn, it is being suggested that the minister of economy Habeck was lied to by his own experts who claimed the phase-out is going to be harmless.^1
At this stage I can only reiterate that since 2011 when the plans were announced hundreds of worldwide climate experts appealed to Germany not to phase-out nuclear, which is one of the few low-carbon and dispatchable sources of energy. Climate scientist James Hansen had been calling German phase-out a “climate crime” and in 2019 hundreds of scientists wrote an open letter to German government asking to reconsider.^2
As I wrote a few years ago, the whole phase-out plan was plagued by cognitive biases, falsified data and excessive optimism about “prospective technologies of future”. The biggest blame however goes to “environmental activists” such as #WWF and #Greenpeace who were absolutely knowingly and cynically lying about both evils of nuclear and benefits of #renewables, convincing many people and pushing the government towards the current failure.^3
texto: los biojet son publicidad engañosa. #repsoltetomaelpelo imagen de anuncio de Repsol sobre combustibles renovables, que pone: una alternativa para descarbonizar la movilidad. en la imagen un avión despegando. sobre ella está el logo de repsol y el texto: FAKE NEWS logo de repsol y el texto: REPARA RECTIFICA Y PAGA
Reducir emisiones con biodiésel de palma es un espejismo. #RepsolTeTomaElPelo aceite de palma = deforestación. la imagen es un oasis en el desierto, como si fuera un espejismo
Intrusion à Flamanville: Greenpeace assume vouloir «jouer avec les règles du jeu du débat de société»
Quinze activistes de #Greenpeace, dont son directeur général Jean-François Julliard, ont comparu mardi devant le tribunal de Cherbourg, poursuivis pour s’être introduits sur le site de l’EPR de #Flamanville. Un procès éminemment politique au cœur de l’une des régions les plus nucléarisées au monde.
EDF réclame près de 1 million d’euros à Greenpeace pour une intrusion
Le fournisseur d’électricité poursuit l’ONG pour l’intrusion dans la centrale de Flamanville en mars 2022. Les quinze militants qui ont participé à l’opération risquent également un an de prison. #Greenpeace dénonce une procédure bâillon.
🌈 Le 10 juillet 1985, dans le port d’Auckland, un bateau de l’association écologiste @greenpeace explose, provoquant la mort d’un photographe et un scandale mondial. Les services secrets français assurent n’y être pour rien. Mais @EdwyPlenel va découvrir un mensonge d’État.
Alors qu'Edwy Plenel quitte la présidence de Mediapart, il revient sur ses derniers scoops et les secrets de fabrication de dix enquêtes mythiques, qu’il a écrites ou supervisées, au «Monde» puis à Mediapart.
#Nigeria scientific journalists debunking popular anti #GMO narratives distributed in #Africa by Western “environmental” activists and the reasons why they were relatively successful over the last 30 years:
There’s a very important distinction to be made here - scientists aren’t activists. The main difference is that when science is generally speaking in the language of probability, activism speaks in language of certainty, hype and simplification.
Scientific evidence for climate change being caused by human CO2 emissions is vast, I would consider it nearly as solid as law of universal gravitation today - the theory behind it is sound and consistent, and it’s consistent with experimental observations.
My problem with “environmental” activism is that it’s selective and often completely wrong. Where science -represented by IPCC - clearly says nuclear power and CRISPR are enablers to decarbonisation, activism - represented by #Greenpeace, #WWF etc - says exactly the opposite. They do say climate change is real, which is consistent with IPCC, but then they reject the whole IPCC package and selectively pick parts they like and those they don’t, in an entirely arbitrary manner.
And by their fierce insistence on doing things their way, they effectively only prevent actual decarbonisation.
That’s unfortunately a classic case study of how #ClimateChange activism as done by #Greenpeace#WWF works exactly against its goals:
Making far-fetching and exaggerated statements about what the climate change symptoms, easily ridiculing the careful, well-sourced and conditional predictions
Turning carefully worded IPCC probabilistic statements into simplistic certainties, further ridiculing actual scientific forecasts
Rushing mitigation goals which are described as “ambitious” but in reality are simply impossible to implement in the declared schedule, ridiculing the actual mitigation scenarios as proposed by IPCC and IEA
Cherry-picking from IPCC and IEA research, praising some solutions and discrediting others (e.g. nuclear), thus further ridiculing their mitigation scenarios and presenting them in the usual “even scientists can’t agree” sauce
In short, I can only encourage you to simply ignore any popular media reporting on climate change because it’s 99% guaranteed to repeat activist narratives, thus repeating the above problems.
Instead, if you go and read the actual IPCC and IEA “net zero” scenarios, which are not only clearly written but also use balanced language and are factually correct, you will see that the actual climate science has nothing to do with the activism and most of the (valid) questions you asked are already answered by them.
The South Taranaki Bight is home to blue #whales, Māui and Hector’s #dolphins, kororā (little #penguins), and key fishing grounds. You may already know that it is under threat once again by the possibility of #SeabedMining. Trans Tasman Resources ( #TTR ) is seeking consent to #mine the seabed of the South Taranaki Bight - to dig up to 50 million tonnes of ironsands a year for over 30 years, dumping 45 million tonnes back onto the seafloor.
"#Greenpeace Japan, meanwhile, warned the release 'disregards scientific evidence, violates the #HumanRights…is non-compliant with international #MaritimeLaw…ignores its people’s concerns, including fishermen.' They added that the Japanese government and Tepco’s decommissioning plan for Fukushima was severely flawed and noted that there was still 'sufficient water storage space' at the site."
@greenpeace_de hat die Verkehrsprognose 2051 des @bmdv von unserem #autominister Wissing nur in 17 von 123 Annahmen - wie z. B. ein Tempolimit von 120 km/h auf Autobahnen - verändert und es kommen völlig andere Ergebnisse heraus.
Machen wir doch mal was ohne #Nazis (zumindest oberflächlich).
#FastFashion produziert #Müllberge. Wie immer wissen wir das schon lange, und hin und wieder sagt auch mal wer, dass er was dagegen tut, aber gelöst ist das #Problem definitiv noch nicht.