#Cybersecurity#Privacy#Encryption#Messaging#Backdoors: "Right now, we need more end-to-end encryption. There’s little evidence that weakening encryption will make much of a dent on the fentanyl trafficking on our streets. But after the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, end-to-end encryption is now a critical means of thwarting attempts to prosecute women who seek abortions in states where politicians lay claim to their major life choices. Last year, Meta turned over private messages from a Facebook user to Nebraska police that led to felony charges against a mother who aided her daughter in ending a pregnancy by abortion pills. If those messages had been protected by end-to-end encryption—as WhatsApp and Signal messages are—authorities would not have been able to read them. If “deliberate blindness” is banned, watch out for widespread snooping to find out who might be seeking abortions."
Ein beliebter Taschenspielertrick: "Der Server steht physisch in einem Serverraum in der EU".
Und nun? Alles in Ordnung mit Datenschutz und Co? Natürlich nicht. Eigentlich ist es egal, wo der Server steht. Entscheidend ist, wer darauf Zugriff hat. Wer mit dem Serverstandort EU argumentiert, hat nicht verstanden, wie das Internet funktioniert.
@EpiphanicSynchronicity@voxel As soon as a company who only delivers closes source software does promote a wrong understanding of #encryption, the whole company can't be trusted any more.
No independent party is able to check anything related to the implementation. The software delivered can contain any number of #backdoors - voluntary or not.
If #security or #privacy is an issue, the software needs to be #opensource in order to be able to check its claims.