I really do believe that EVERYONE should exercise their creativity and make art. Even if it’s not good. Even if your first attempts are clumsy, poorly executed, and amateurish (and oh yes they will be!). Because:
I think creativity is an innate part of being human.
It’s therapeutic
It works your brain in good ways—it’s a type of imaginative play
It makes you appreciate other’s creative efforts more, b/c you have first-hand experience in how challenging it can be
LMAO, this is so fucking dumb. I am not even 100% against using tools that might be described as "AI" by the hucksters as part of your creative process, but holy fuck, thinking that typing a few words of description into a machine and having it spit out some milquetoast average of all things that kinda sorta fit your description is "creat[ing] your own music" is just ultimate smoothbrain shit.
Like hitting the DEMO button on a synth and thinking you created that.
I feel like those using it as a tool are already skilled enough at music to know how to use it as a “tool that serves their own creative intentions,” whereas those who think they are creating music merely by inputting a prompt have no clue what all is involved in the actual creation & production of music.
Certainly the fact that they’re self-satisfied and enamored with the pablum the AI spits out based on their prompts reveals that they don’t have good or refined musical tastes.
@KydiaMusic That's been my big takeaway with ALL the AI-generated stuff. If you think it's actually GOOD... well, let's just say I've always been a little suspicious of the average person's taste in art, and now I know I was being way, WAY too generous.
@defaultmediatransmitter@mxtthxw@KydiaMusic its interesting. Can they actually make money with AI? Given that a couple of UK/US courts have ruled you cant own the copyright on AI generated content.
Add comment