@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Excrubulent

@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Even billionaires have to work with the two party system.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

At first I wondered what the secret message would be to braille users, then I realised they wouldn’t know either.

This stuff about the price reductions after 4 years of blatant gouging is really freaking me out

I mean, that’s 4 years of our lives taken! 4 years of opportunities that were more challenging because they wanted a number on a computer to go up! 4 years of feeling worse than necessary about my finances and management of them and general personhood because i felt like i couldn’t afford anything because everything was...

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

It turns out the supply & demand story of economics is basically horseshit, and if you look at how the economy works scientifically - which in this case just means paying attention to what actually happens and letting that shape your theories rather than demanding that your theories are correct and patching them ad-hoc to pretend you were always right - then essentially inflation is caused by price setters just hiking prices.

strangematters.coop/supply-chain-theory-of-inflat…

This is a decent interview with the authors where they also talk about how orthodox economists gatekeep their theories and launder other’s theories so they never have to admit they were wrong:

iheart.com/…/the-imf-admits-we-were-right-1215300…

So yeah, you’re not crazy, it is just corporations using their price setting powers to shit on us, and economists giving them cover.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

This is another story that orthodox economics tells, but the supply chain model takes competition into account and appears to operate in its presence.

Monopoly is a problem, but even the story that competition keeps prices down is a false one.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Seriously? That’s hilarious and also polluting the training data if true.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

No Miracles Needed

We don’t need nuclear power which has decades of lead time and huge carbon costs to construct anyway.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

The whole point is that at some point somebody can check, and you can have a higher level of trust in that than proprietary software.

And if someone does something like this then it has to be disguised as an innocuous bug, like heartbleed, they can’t just install full on malware.

It’s a different beast entirely.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Okay, but that’s a different claim than that you have to personally vet and compile every single thing you use, which is what I was responding to.

Open source isn’t perfect, but it is objectively and obviously better than closed.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Just think that we’re only seeing photos of the aftermath of cars that:

  1. Hit with enough speed to fully mount the rock.
  2. Stayed high-centred.

If it was just a glancing blow, or the car slipped off sideways or even made it all the way over, it would limp away and avoid the photograph of shame.

There’s gotta be a lot more cars hitting this thing than get officially reported.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Oh no, mammoth haters! A very real group of people that I am now extremely angry about.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Yup. The only real difference is the pricing model, the program is pretty much the same.

I rememeber they tried offering online libraries of stuff for download to justify the subscription for some products.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

This is the first convincing argument I’ve ever seen for imperial.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Honestly this is great, non-techy people making the transition is a good sign and something the system needs to gain mainstream appeal.

Also, people who aren’t techy are less likely to accept hacky workaround BS and complain until it’s fixed on a system-wide level, and that’s needed to mature the platform to something anyone can use. It’s getting there but it’s still got a lot of rough edges.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

I think the answer is not to gatekeep against advertising actively, but to have a platform that is resilient to that kind of thing. Like, if there were advertising on an instance people would fucking BOUNCE I think. And if it got somehow baked into the platform itself there would be a new fork with the advertising excised before the sun went down.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

I don’t know either, but so far not a single instance has even tried to my knowledge. I have a very hard time imagining people being okay with it.

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Idk, he’s sponsoring a genocide. I’m pretty sure that counts as war crimes. To be fair it’s not like any US president in the last half century hasn’t been some kind of war criminal.

I mean now that the other guy is a literal criminal it makes it less likely that the genocide sponsor’s refusal to remove his material support for a historically unpopular genocide will make him lose election to the literal criminal, and that’s true. But like, I just want you to understand what it is that you’re celebrating.

I don’t know a stronger way to say that the bar is in hell, but that phrase is so well worn that it’s lost any punch it ever had.

Edit: typically, the only responses seem to think I’m saying this in support of Trump but like… I’m not. So if you remove that imagined motivation, where’s the lie? There isn’t one, right?

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

How do you so constantly and completely deflect any and all criticism to the other guy?

I have the answer: because that’s how the two party system works to push you towards defending the genocide guy.

Like, you get that the genocide support has a good chance of making him lose to the somehow-worse-genocide-guy, right? Like why aren’t you mad about that? Why do you constantly have to tell everyone to stop talking about the genocide support? You realise that’s a kind of genocide denial, right?

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

There are exactly two options with voting. I assume you don’t see any others because your entire political imagination has been contracted to voting. I believe I anticipated your answer when I said that the two-party system has done this to your brain.

And “walking back” support of the genocide is one way to say that he hasn’t actually removed any of the material support, and also a way to obscure the fact that the “walking back” has mostly been lip service.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Nobody.

Two questions:

  1. Do you think I am somehow saying people shouldn’t vote for Biden? If so, can you explain where I have said that?
  2. Do you think the fact that Biden is the tactically superior choice means that we should not discuss that he is complicit in genocide?
Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar
  1. You’re begging the question.
  2. So your focus on winning Biden the election necessitates genocide denial.
    Not a denial that the genocide is happening, but a denial of holding the perpetrators accountable.
Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

So what is it? Should we not talk about it? Does it not matter? If you don’t want me to read into it then have the courage of your convictions and say what you fucking mean instead of talking around it with “see answer to 1”.

What do you propose we do about Biden’s genocide support? Just shut up about it? What?

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Because the shaming tone is just infuriating. Yes, new people have problems with the system, shaming them by telling them their problems are “baffling” is tone-deaf.

Worse, if you have to shame people into using your system, it sends the message that Linux has serious problems that people need to be shamed into accepting. Shaming people into changing their behaviour basically never works by the way, outside of maybe a very insular village setting.

A better title might be, “Solutions to newcomers’s most common problems with Linux”, but the way it’s always phrased is, “Hey all the problems are going away and you’re frankly a teensy tiny brained baby if you’re not using Linux!” Like, maybe fuck off. Maybe show people that the community is capable of advertising itself with literally anything besides toxicity.

I have been on-board with the mission of Linux and hearing this “Hey the switch is actually easy!” gaslighting bullshit for 15 years now. I still haven’t managed to get rid of Windows 100%, and I honestly don’t want to ask for help from literally any Linux fanboy because they have proven themselves to be amongst the most rabidly condescending shits I’ve ever spoken to.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Yes, it’s true, that’s why I asked you questions and let you answer them. They were leading questions because I wanted to understand something specific. I wouldn’t have told you your answers were wrong, I just would’ve asked until I understood, but you’ve chosen to stop answering the questions which means I don’t think there’s much I can learn here.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Leos
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines