pauld

@pauld@hcommons.social

Philosopher, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne. My research interests mostly revolve around contingency, reality, materialism, dialectics, Gilles Deleuze and the Frankfurt School. Happy to talk #philosophy both en français & in English. #SlowScience

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

pauld, to philosophy

Mlast post (5/5) about Adorno's Constellations.

Of course, although I really like the concept, that presentation wouldn't be complete without a bit of criticism. So let me expose here 4 shortcomings of Constellations and finally explain why I think this concept remains central in contemporary philosophy.

@icymi_philosophy @philosophy

https://pauldablemont.vercel.app/posts/adorno-s-constellations-5/

pauld, to philosophy

Check my new post on Philosophical Annexes 😉

I'm still talking about #Adorno and #constellations !

#Philosophy @icymi_philosophy @philosophy

https://pauldablemont.vercel.app/posts/adorno-s-constellations-4/

pauld, to Logseq

Slowly getting my way around #Logseq coming from Obsidian. It's definitely better for my workflow as I have a lot less copy/paste to manage.

@logseq

pauld, to philosophy

Ne manquez pas le Séminaire des doctorants du CIRLEP #3 ce soir à 18h30, c'est moi qui présente!

L’idée de constellation chez T. W. Adorno. Adorno parle dans la Dialectique négative de l’inévitable insuffisance des idées et concepts. Il pointe là vers une ruine profonde de la philosophie traditionnelle : la croyance en la toute puissance de la compréhension et de la pensée conceptuelles, censées être sans limites. Le concept ne peut traditionnellement exprimer que le général et jamais le particulier ; il ne peut jamais subsumer la singularité de l’objet. Pourtant nous pensons bel et bien par concept – même Adorno l’accepte. Cela voudrait-il dire qu’on ne peut jamais entrer dans la singularité d’une chose ? C’est précisément là qu’intervient la constellation adornienne – une tentative unique de dépasser le concept par le concept, et de penser la singularité de l’objet au sein de la dialectique négative.

https://univ-reims-fr.zoom.us/j/99685971722

#Philosophy @icymi_philosophy @philosophy

pauld, to philosophy

Today, the post #3 of Adorno's Constellation. I try to get a good definition and the consequences of this definition. Enjoy!

@icymi_philosophy @philosophy

https://pauldablemont.vercel.app/posts/adorno-s-constellations-3/

pauld, to philosophy

Today, the post #3 of Adorno's Constellation. I try to get a good definition and the consequences of this definition. Enjoy!

@icymi_philosophy @philosophy

https://pauldablemont.vercel.app/posts/adorno-s-constellations-3/

pauld, to philosophy

Today, the post #3 of Adorno's Constellation. I try to get a good definition and the consequences of this definition. Enjoy!

@icymi_philosophy @philosophy

https://pauldablemont.vercel.app/posts/adorno-s-constellations-3/

pauld, to philosophy

Lundi 19 février à 18h30 aura lieu le second séminaire 2024 des doctorants du CIRLEP (voir le lien plus bas). Vincent Morin nous présentera la communication suivante :

« Temps et causalité - Quel est le moteur du temps ? » Les physiciens définissent le cours du temps comme l’irréversible écoulement des instants, faisant que chacun est inédit, et la flèche du temps comme la possibilité pour les systèmes physiques de devenir. Mais la causalité étant une caractéristique des phénomènes (donc de la flèche du temps), n’est-on pas légitime à s’interroger quant au lien existant entre les deux, notamment pour se demander si l’un ne serait pas le « moteur » de l’autre ? À travers différentes hypothèses, nous disserterons à la fois sur la possible nature du temps et sur les freins rencontrés par la recherche de sa connaissance.

Voici le lien : https://univ-reims-fr.zoom.us/j/99685971722 .

@philosophy @icymi_philosophy
@philosophyblogs

pauld,

Ça serait une excellente question à poser à Vincent Morin lundi !

@Vinz @philosophy @icymi_philosophy @philosophyblogs

pauld, to philosophy

New post in a couple of hours on substack. It's the last part of the mini-series about the concept of difference: conceptualization! How will I build a harmonious concept of difference? Subscribe to know: pauldablemont.substack.com/

@icymi_philosophy @philosophy @ewisniowski

pauld, to random

Love Stephen Fry, and love Nick Cave. This letter about creation and AI is brilliant.

What do you think?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGJcF4bLKd4&t=275s

#stephenfry philosophy@botsin.space philosophy@a.gup.pe

pauld, to philosophy

New post today! Tackling relative difference before building the concept of difference (that's for the next episode. Don't miss it and subscribe at https://pauldablemont.substack.com/

#philosophy @philosophyblogs @philosophy

pauld, to philosophy

New post later today. Don't miss it and subscribe at https://pauldablemont.substack.com/

@philosophyblogs @philosophy

pauld, to philosophy

Great read for your Sunday talking about Deleuze Sartre and the concept of difference! Feeling a little better today.

#philosophy @philosophyblogs @philosophy

https://open.substack.com/pub/pauldablemont/p/deleuze-sartre-difference-and-monstrosity?r=2sx7zx&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

pauld, to philosophy

Subscribe before Thursday to receive the new post free! https://pauldablemont.substack.com/

@philosophy

pauld, to philosophy

Subscribe before Thursday to receive the new post free!

#Philosophy #Substack @philosophy

davidho, to random
@davidho@mastodon.world avatar

We talk about Dutch bike infrastructure but not enough about Belgian bike infrastructure.

They have roads in Brussels where bikes have priority and cars aren’t allowed to pass.

A road where bikes have priority painted yellow.

pauld,

@davidho Where is this? I bike a lot in Brussels, and I've never seen anything like it!

Private
pauld,

@cbontenbal @davidesalerno68 @economics @smithkm @philosophy I think you can look for these arguments for a long time! Many philosophers are still looking for them. Transcendence isn't a necessity.

pauld,

@SusanHR @cbontenbal @davidesalerno68 @economics @smithkm @philosophy Ilyenkov has an interesting view on this : Thought is the highest mode of matter. After all, we think, and our thoughts come from matter.

pauld,

@cbontenbal @davidesalerno68 @jordan_kendrick @economics @smithkm @philosophy Why?

pauld,

@lack @jordan_kendrick @davidesalerno68 @cbontenbal @economics @smithkm @philosophy I'm sorry but where does this opiniated discussion lead? Nature isn't necessary nor eternal as it is contingent, and I don't see why, if it were necessary and eternal, it would imply that it is absolute.

pauld,

@lack @jordan_kendrick @davidesalerno68 @cbontenbal @economics @smithkm @philosophy The absolute in philosophy is what exists by itself, without any condition or dependency. So I don't think it implies any form of eternity nor necessity.

Contingency isn't related to absolute as it is the possibility for a thing or a being to be or not to be. Contingency is opposed to necessity or eternity in the very idea that something that is can stop being or move to a non-being position or vice-versa. Now - I'm trying to be synthetic so it is incredibly simplified - if you don't build your world on a primary/first principle and correlationism (and there are many reasons too), Nature emerged from chaos and chaos can't produce a necessary being because precisely contingency is eternal and the only necessity the chaotic world knows.

pauld,

@lack @jordan_kendrick @davidesalerno68 @cbontenbal @economics @smithkm @philosophy Does that answer your question at least partly ?

pauld,

@SusanHR @lack @EdwardJCornwell @msteenhagen @Drew @philippsteinkrueger @spencer @cbontenbal @philosophy Why bringing Descartes into this? If you can't think, believe or imagine something how would you know it exists? So if you don't know it exists, how can you imagine a creator for it?

pauld,

@smithkm @lack @jordan_kendrick @davidesalerno68 @cbontenbal @economics @philosophy Are you answering me? Because I don't know how it is related. It must be a mistake.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Leos
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •