rachaelspooky,
@rachaelspooky@cyberpunk.lol avatar

fun fact: the solar eclipse, as we experience it, is a uniquely Earthly phenomenon. we haven't seen another planet out there with exactly the right ratio of sizes and orbits so that a moon will block out a star but not its corona.

rachaelspooky,
@rachaelspooky@cyberpunk.lol avatar

hey! this post is doing well! if you want to help out a trans woman who was fired for being trans and can't find work because the tech world has gone to shit, my venmo is $rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@rachaelspooky

The moon's orbit's radius increases by 3.8cm every year, so there will be a moment when it will be too far from earth to cover the sun entirely.

I wonder, when the last total eclipse will be. I will have to do the Maths.

luis_in_brief,
@luis_in_brief@social.coop avatar
mattdm,
@mattdm@hachyderm.io avatar

@rachaelspooky

It's such a weird thing! It's so close to perfect! Why? Why???

mountdiscovery,

@mattdm @rachaelspooky

"It may be just serendipity that the sun is 400 times bigger than the moon but is also 400 times further away, meaning that both bodies appear the same size in the sky creating the perfect fit for the flaming sky show of a solar eclipse."

Jeffrey Kluger calls it the cold hard science warmed and redeemed by the fact that we are here to bear witness to it.

And most importantly to be moved by it.

Arcaik,
@Arcaik@hachyderm.io avatar

@mountdiscovery @mattdm @rachaelspooky Isn't that an application of the anthropic principle? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle

mattdm,
@mattdm@hachyderm.io avatar

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

Maybe? Maybe something about this structure is conducive to life as we know it. Or maybe just really weird coincidence that seems significant because it happened to us. Not a big enough sample size to tell!

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@mattdm

Indeed!

The specific configuration of the Earth, Moon, Sun triangle contributes greatly to how life evolved on Earth.

1: A single large satellite in an almost circular orbit stabilizes a planet's axis, contributing to stable conditions for solar radiation at any given point of the planet's surface.

2: The tides create a special transition zone between maritime and dry areas on shallow coasts, facilitating life's step towards the land.

1/?

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@mattdm

The general conditions on Earth and in our solar system are pretty unique in the known universe.

Our solar system is located in a rather "quiet" corner of the galaxy.

There are no supermassive stars in our neighbourhood which could go supernova and blast away our entire biosphere with radiation when they do.

The nearest such star is Betelgeuse, at 500 light years distance, conveniently far enough to not pose any risk.

2/?

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@mattdm

Then: The sun is not a binary star, as most large stars in the galaxy seem to be. In a binary or trinary system, we wouldn't see stable orbits, as our planet has (the three body problem).

Furthermore: In terms of size, our sun is a class "G" star, which puts it in a very sweet spot, when it comes to stars' sizes:

Bigger stars burn faster, not giving billions of years for evolution.

3/?

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@mattdm

Smaller stars live longer, but their physics is more unstable, creating huge electromagnetic outbursts, which would destroy complex molecules or could even blow away an entire atmosphere.

G-class stars are rather rare specimens.

Then, we have a massive planet like Jupiter in our solar system (far enough to not mingle with our planet's orbit), which acts like a gigantic hoover, catching comets and huge asteroids floating around.

4/?

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@mattdm

We all know, what happened to the dinosaurs.

Imagine, what could happen if we were hit by even bigger objects more often. One of these could have killed all life.

Then, during the forming phase of the solar system, Earth collided with another planet, Theia, forming the moon (which we already saw, is important), but also provided extra metal for the Earth's core, which gives our planet a stronger magnetic field than of any other of

5/?

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@mattdm

any other of inner planets, thus protecting us (and our thin and precious atmosphere) very effectively from the solar wind.

Hard radiation, as the Sun emits it, is deadly. Thankfully, we have the magnetic field and the air to keep it away.

Then, of course, heavy elements.

Our sun is a second or third generation star in the universe.

If it were a first generation one, we would only have Hydrogen and Helium. No chance to build complex

6/?

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina, (edited )
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@mattdm

molecules.

I could go on and on.

I don't say, life couldn't evolve under other circumstances (we don't know, the universe is so incredibly big, we can not even really imagine its size), but the special conditions we find here, are truly quite rare, at least, as far as we know.

Our exploration of the universe and our galactic neighbourhood will remain fascinating as long as we do not kill ourselves with our own stupidity.

7/7

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mattdm,
@mattdm@hachyderm.io avatar

@mina @Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

> The nearest such star is Betelgeuse, at 500 light years distance, conveniently far enough to not pose any risk.

Famous last words!

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@mattdm

Hi hi! 🤣

I should have added: »at least, this is what astronomers assure us or "they" want us to believe«.

@Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

fasnix,
@fasnix@dresden.network avatar

@mina @mattdm @Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

Regarding sizes, distances and other measurements, I can recommend watching
"Hidden Mathematics - Ancient Knowledge of Space, Time & Cosmic Cycles" with #RandallCarlson, which shows lots of so called "coincidences" - almost as if everything was designed on purpose.

https://iv.melmac.space/watch?v=R7oyZGW99os

#AfterSkool
#Invidious
#YouTube

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

I am definitely going to watch this today.

Usually I'm a bit careful with pointing out such coincidences, because people tend to see "hidden plans" (i.e. religious or esoteric stuff) behind everything.

@mattdm @Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

fasnix,
@fasnix@dresden.network avatar

@mina
Would be great if you watched the complete video, even if it may sound too "far fetched".
Let me know what you think about it.

@mattdm @Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

I have the tab open and will most certainly watch it entirely.

@mattdm @Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

Jetzt fange ich gerade an zu gucken und er macht mich schon nervös, weil er es erstaunlich findet, weil er Zusammenhänge zwischen Einheiten, die auf den gleichen Primfaktoren aufbauen, findet.

Aber, schauen wir mal weiter.

@mattdm @Arcaik @mountdiscovery @rachaelspooky

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

Und jetzt die "kabbalistische" Überraschung(!).

All diese Zahlen haben die Quersumme 9

So ist es nun mal im Dezimalsystem, wenn mindestens 2× der Primfaktor 3 auftritt (Einfach zu beweisen) und so sind diese Einheiten absichtlich konstruiert.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

Bei der Geometrie kriege ich die Krise (sorry!)

"The sum of angles in all these polygones again have the square sum of 9, for some strange reason".

Fuck nein! Nix "strange reason"

Die Innensumme der Winkel eines Dreiecks sind 2 rechte Winkel (Euklid!). Jedes Polygon lässt sich in Dreiecke zerlegen, also sind die Summen der Innenwinkel immer Vielfache rechter Winkel.

Und wenn der rechte Winkel in einer Einheit durch 9 teilbar ist, ist die Folgerung zwar cool, aber trivial.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

Und jetzt das:

Das Oktaeder hat die gleiche Winkelsumme wie die Anzahl der Minuten im Tag!

No shit, Sherlock!

8 × 180 = 24 × 60

Wer hätte das für möglich gehalten?!

Wird das besser? Ich brauche eine Pause. Sonst fresse ich die Tischplatte.

fasnix,
@fasnix@dresden.network avatar

@mina
Ähm, ich bin mir nicht sicher ob das besser wird :'D

Zieh's durch! ;)

(Ich hab leider keine sooo tiefgehenden mathematischen Kenntnisse ...)

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

Ich versuch's. Versprochen!

fasnix,
@fasnix@dresden.network avatar

@mina
War das Video dann doch zu absurd?

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

Ich hab bisher nicht die innere Ruhe gehabt, aber den Tab habe ich noch offen.

fasnix,
@fasnix@dresden.network avatar

@mina
Ok, keine Eile, kann verstehen, dass Du dafür die Muse haben musst um weiter zu schauen :D

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@fasnix

Ich nehme zwar gerne eine Muse dazu, aber Muße reicht schon.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines