@tb@tldr.nettime.org
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

tb

@tb@tldr.nettime.org

Recovering (w)academic, ex-artist, untethered researcher/editor/writer (EU research network grants esp), co-founder/booster for Open Syllabus (opensyllabus.org), nettime co-mod for 25 yrs. I was "working at the intersection of" back when that sounded like a red-light districts not a venn diagram. Un/timely nanorants and against-the-grain comments on #dataviz, debris from writing a cultural history of WTF people think “information” looks like. I bounce between the Deep North and the Deep South.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

tb, to random
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

[1/x] I rarely read the Intercept these days, because over time its various agendas and tendencies seemed to become more and more tangled. Their story about the Columbia Law Review suffers from a bit of that, but it's well worth reading. Here’s a paywall-circumventing link:

https://theintercept.com/2024/06/03/columbia-law-review-palestine-board-website/

tl;dr: a Palestinian legal scholar, Rabea Eghbariah, has been trying to publish an article arguing for “Nakba as its own legal concept in international law...a legal framework...similar to genocide and apartheid, which were concretized as crimes in response to specific atrocities carried out by Nazi Germany and white-ruled South Africa, respectively.” Harvard Law Review agreed to publish it last fall, so it went through the full editorial process, but they spiked it at the last minute. Columbia Law Review “solicited a new article from the scholar” that “significantly expands on Eghbariah’s argument for Nakba as its own legal concept in international law,” and put it through a similar process. Then things get...complicated.

OT1H: “the text was more widely circulated among a greater number of people” than any article before. OT2H, the editorial process was unusual (understandably, imo): one editor said, “there was some additional work put into it, but in general, it was the same steps of production” — editors are normally randomly assigned but in this case were it was “volunteer-based...given the fraught nature of the subject matter”; drafts “were only available on a drive shared between the opt-in committee directly working on it, rather than all editors.”

tb, to random
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar
tb, to random
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

As I’ve grown older I’ve learned to embrace a simple rule, which is an excellent way to evaluate someone’s ~politics: if you’re going to be critical, then give credit when and where it’s due. People who don’t do that (hello, much of the soi-disant left these days) are not to be trusted. So, with that in mind, a shout-out to everyone at the NYT who had a hand in this headline — and participation ribbon, like, say, a small and faded one we found in the junk drawer — to the photo editors / art directors / designers who chose this pic then ran knockout type over the noisiest part.

impactology, to random
@impactology@mastodon.social avatar

The Problem Isn’t Just Netanyahu. It’s Israeli Society By Mairav Zonszein

Despite blaming the prime minister, a large majority of Jewish Israeli citizens support his destructive policies in Gaza and beyond.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/04/02/netanyahu-gaza-palestinians-war-israeli-society/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuB5SeahL-E

"There really is such a diminishing left in Israel. I mean look at the polling, less than 2% thought that Israel was using too much Firepower in Gaza after they obliterated and decimated the entire Gaza Strip" — Abby Martin

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology It hasn’t always been the norm, and — unless one is willing to openly argue that Israel should cease to exist — hopefully it won’t always be the norm. There’s a ferocious left in Israel, and I for one hope they’ll gain much more power. That’s why Martin’s flavor of bombast is so counterproductive: she waves away the only viable alternative (which is her explicit raison d’être, of course), then complains there’s no alternative. But what else should we expect from a 9/11 truther? Don’t bother answering — I don’t give people like her any more oxygen than necessary.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology Not sure where they are now, but they were out in huge numbers in the streets of central Tel Aviv every week for months on end. Or did you forget those demos because you were too busy snarking? But tell me, where are the 👉🏼 49.5% of Israeli Arabs 👈🏼 who, according to this poll, don’t agree with the statement that Israel is using too much firepower? Again, don’t answer that. My view is clear: if we want a better future for people in the region, we need to acknowledge and encourage the people on the ground who are most likely to make it happen. Spreading bombast and picking details out of polls without context do the opposite.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology When you ask a question then follow with a factoid implying there is no answer, don’t be surprised if you get no answer. In any event, it didn’t really need one: surely you’re aware of the years of anti–Netanyahu protests? If not, https://gprivate.com/6b2lg

interfluidity, to random
@interfluidity@zirk.us avatar

This is madness.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@interfluidity Today is also the deadline for new admits to deposit — or, in plainspeak, it’s when people who applied to a school and were accepted have to sign on the dotted line.

These last weeks leading up to that are crucial: schools do everything they can — most of all, by being really nice — to persuade people to come.

Columbia, in contrast, has spent these weeks exaggerating and escalating the anxieties, fears, tensions, chaos, conflict, confrontations, risks, threats, violence. Their admissions numbers are going to collapse.

And, Groucho Marx–style, I’m not even sure I’d want to go to school with people who want to go there next year. That’s a big deal for be to say: I’m a proud alumnus and a neighbor for thirty years, and CU has been a positive presence in my life, often in a daily basis. But now I’m really, really, REALLY angry.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@interfluidity 🎯 — every word. Columbia’s toxic tantrum turned a bunch of tents into a national (arguably international) wildcat strike. Another way to say that: huge numbers are drawn to these protests more by solidarity with fellow students than by support for a “free Palestine.” I seriously doubt the hostilities will end by September, so protests will likely resume in the fall in one form or another. That’d make the election much riskier, and if Trump wins he’d escalate wildly. Listening to what undergrads have to say vs seeing fascists launch a nationwide war on academia is not a hard choice. @phillmv

tb, to Columbia
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar
tb, to random
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

🎯

tb, to random
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

Nothing special, just NASA successfully debugging a 46-year-old space probe that's 15 billion miles away, i.e., outside the solar system

https://blogs.nasa.gov/voyager/2024/04/22/nasas-voyager-1-resumes-sending-engineering-updates-to-earth/

tb, to random
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

Just filing this in public because, I mean, Maoist experimental musicians in ’70s London attacking Stockhausen as counterrevolutionary?

https://www.commentary.org/articles/samuel-lipman/stockhausen-serves-imperialism-by-cornelius-cardew/

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

Related

impactology, to random
@impactology@mastodon.social avatar

I just realised Bret Victor has always emphasized the importance of graphic design and information design as key for his concept of dynamic pictures and visual explanations. Its not ui, ixd or hci.

Its plain graphic design and information design but using it to make tacit information explicit.

I think his novelty lies with the way he selects a particular tacit activity and information.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology My sense is that the work of Victor (and, crucially, the group he works with) is so strong because, at its core, it rejects those pseudo-disciplinary distinctions.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology Absolutely. The formulation I arrived at (through years of teaching design, running a visual design dept, etc) was: Objects dissolve theory. Re your other note about wasting all that time: you didn’t. And if you do indeed start to study GD (I’m more skeptical that ID is a thing in its own right), you'll quickly see it wasn’t a waste at all. The meta-structures ‘behind’ visual design — typography and lettering, for example — have changed over time, often to keep pace with the materials that dominated the production of tools: wood, lead, stone, synthetics, photo, etc. The fact that ~coding is more ‘virtual’ than wood or lead makes it no less real. Here’s a concrete example from the book I have at hand, Clarence Hornung’s Lettering (my interest in it is very niche, there are many better sources on the subject): you can plainly see how much its geometric language shared with architecture, but it could equally — and/or differently — be expressed in terms of code.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology I’m years into writing a cultural history of what we think information/etc looks like and I haven’t seen anything in their work that moves beyond either — take your pick — (a) standard marketing rhetoric or (b) ideas that are many decades old. That’s not a criticism of their work at all, I’m just skeptical about your assessment.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology I have even worse news for you: there was demand for that kind of specialized nexus before ID (or whatever we want to call it) became a thing as it’s commonly seen now. The post-Tufte articulation of the field — basically, as a generalized form of expertise — is a symptom of the death of specialized areas that were discipline- or context-specific.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology I’d love to see that collection

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology Not really, no, because the field wasn’t really theorized as such. In English the phrase “graphic design” was coined by Dwiggins in 1922, so we shouldn’t expect to see signs of it splintering into subspecialties for decades to come — and its focus was always more practical than philosophical. The larger problem is that Tufte played a towering role in (re)shaping the field, but (a) his central argument is not just wrong but backwards, and (b) he was actively intellectually dishonest. He presented ID in a classicizing light (Playfair, Minard, etc) and complained that it was corrupted by pop influences, but that’s just not how things unfolded.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology If you haven’t studied or taught GD or ID, it’ll be pretty hard to reinvent them. 🌞 And the history of GD in particular is littered with principles, rules, schools, etc.

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology Unsolicited advice: keywords/tags would work better than folders. If your collection is effectively locked ~behind a plugin, it sounds like your data is more like in the form of pointers (e.g., URLs) than files? If so, then extracting them should be easy enough. The next step would be to validate them — I haven’t kept track, but there are lots of tools for that. Next would be bulk DL, ideally chained to OCR + some NLP-ish process to generate provisional tags. If it were me, I’d just use some kitchen-sink tool like Devon Tech’s suite (I’ve used it for years and it’s solid as a rock).

tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@impactology It’s got nothing to do with theoretical heft. On the contrary, in my experience, theory was mostly bolted on by people who aren’t primarily practitioners - not a bad thing, just not necssary. It’s really about learning to un/see as a visual designer, and on that basis (a) learning to see how others see and (b) seeing how others learn to see.

tb, to random
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

Spark, a major email client, announced:

/// Last year, we introduced Spark+ AI to help with emails, and it's been a game-changer for a lot of us. Nearly 60% of our Premium users are already using Spark +AI actively. But we've heard your feedback - sometimes, those AI drafts don't quite sound like you, requiring extensive editing. We get it, and we've been working on that. Spark +AI - My Writing Style allows you to draft emails in your unique tone, making it a more efficient and personalized AI writing assistant. No more feeling like your messages could have come from anyone else or a bot. ///

If you spend a little time pondering that paragraph, your efforts will be richly rewarded.

jamiemccarthy, to random
@jamiemccarthy@mastodon.social avatar
tb,
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@jamiemccarthy @mattsheffield

This is a top-notch analysis. One additional factor: that voice is part of a larger self-presentation with strict requirements — acceptable subjects, associations / segues, and speed. With strangers, it can take the form of a chipper stream of easy chat about weather, family, gardening, food, etc. Those "lite" sides mask what's going on: you're being probed from a dozen directions to suss out who you are and how you fit in. That’s an aggressively interactive process, but the SotU and response are old-media, so her presentation lost much of its force.

tb, to Jailbreak
@tb@tldr.nettime.org avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • lostlight
  • All magazines