@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

lutindiscret

@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com

Développe en #Java #Javascript #git #SQL #postgreSQL et bricole sur #finance #rémunération #juridique chez https://mastodon.libre-entreprise.com/@codelutin

Sur Masto pour échanges constructifs et réseautage afin de faire avancer mes causes : #LogicielLibre #ViePrivée #autogestion

Anime https://mastodon.libre-entreprise.com/@copiepublique

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

J12t, to fediverse
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Wild idea:

#ActivityPub over #tor.

Single-user instances for sure. Like hosted from your home on your own #raspberrypi.

What could one do with that?

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@thisismissem .onion domain are gratis unlike 99% of others

@J12t

cquest, to random French
@cquest@amicale.net avatar

Grrr... changement de freebox

Delta > Ultra

Toute la config précédente perdue...

  • adresse IP interne de box changée,
  • toutes les redirections de ports perdues,
  • plus de config depuis l'espace abonné free.

Bien sûr pas de sauvegarde de la config, dont je n'ai jamais eu besoin en 20 ans et 3 ou 4 changements de box !

Pas glop, pas glop.

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@cquest go @ffdn

adele, to microsoft
@adele@phpc.social avatar

I wonder if it would be possible to configure my mail server to reject emails from and (replying they are not accepted because of spying users) 🤔
Is it a good idea? Is there anybody doing that?
I know it will cut me out of many contacts but I really don't want to be targeted by their algorithms.

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@adele I really wanted to try that.

Another idea: configure your smtp server to, when recipient is GAFAM, remove the body, replace by a URL, opening the URL in browser show actual body (after a little challenge (form POST) because GAFAM open every URL you send to gmail). People could reply to you from there.

Yes your meta-data have been stolen but at least only the human will see the body.

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@adele yes. I think you could reuse some piece of code to encrypt bodies with a key that is in the fragment of the URL sent, like zerobin. Also, when the person reply, you could tune the sent email by adding well defined threadid, messageids, etc... so the reply will show in a thread in your mailbox transparently like if it was a normal reply.

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@adele I won't try to sell you delta.chat again but with https://autocrypt.org/ support you could, at the same moment you intercept the body, extract the public key which is proposed for the exchange. So your platform will be 0-setup.

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@adele another idea: you could maybe plug it to a @simplelogin and generate a unique mail address as the sender to preserve anonymity... but then it comes to how can the recipient know it's you 🤔

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@adele i don't know privatebin UI but don't forget to add a "click to view" step (a dummy form that make a POST is sufficient) or GAFAM will scrape the content and defeat the whole purpose (they do it for every URL in every email, virus detection among other reasons).

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@adele also would privatebin be able to store attachment to download? 🤔

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@adele well for attachments you could have a first step that upload files to a one-click hosting self-hosted thing like https://framagit.org/fiat-tux/hat-softwares/lufi or any of https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted#file-transfer---single-click--drag-n-drop-upload and add the links to the body 🤔

Also may https://onionshare.org/ would help 🤔

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@Camus https://www.popcornfr.com/ c'est du nodeBB, ils pourraient fédérer

@quitterreddit

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@Camus je sais pas mais ça devrait ! c'est justement le principal développeur @devnull qui lance et anime le "threadiverse working group" https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17908/threadiverse-working-group

@quitterreddit

panos, to mastodon
@panos@catodon.social avatar

Small rant about small character limits in fedi, like 's 500 limit, just because I had this discussion recently.

I think it makes no sense for the . This is a criticism towards as well, which defines notes as short posts, around a paragraph.

How did "microblogging" came to be? In the early internet we had no limitations like this. If you wanted to post something (say in a forum), you could usually just write what you wanted, as long as it needed to be (there might be technical limitations, but not a conscious limit of "you should express yourself in under xxx characters". How did this become a thing?

started as a platform where you could post via SMS, hence the initial character limit was 140. But nowadays we don't have technical limitations like that. So why do software designers still feel the need to restrict users in such a way? I believe it is a failed concept, one that has been surpassed in practice. If people want to write 1000 or 5000 characters, they will. And they do. That's how "threads" are born. OK, sometimes a person consciously wants to split a post in parts, but most of the times it is just to go around the platform's character limit. So if the goal is to have a platform where people express themselves in 500 characters or less, then this design fails hard, because you can't force people to do that if they don't want to. If I want my posts to be short, I will make them short, no need to restrict me. If I want to make a longer post once in a while, I will also post it, I will just have to hit reply as many times as needed for all of my text to reach my followers.

The problem with this, besides that it's impractical and gets in the users' way, is that it actually does the opposite of what might be expected: Instead of not serving long texts to users, you serve them in multiple posts, creating clutter in the timeline. And this way they can't avoid getting the whole text in their timelines, even if it's something they are not interested in!

The simplest and most obvious way to handle this is letting users write their posts, however long they want to make them, and only show the first xxx characters in the timeline, with a "Show more" button. This way users can express themselves in the way they prefer (it's their wall/social feed after all!), and their followers are not served several consequential posts about something they might not care about. It's one opinion, one post, it should come to my timeline once, and then I can decide if I want to click on it and read all of it.

It's funny, but my early fediverse experience was vastly improved when @atomicpoet moved from mastodon.social to calckey.social. I loved reading his posts, but they tended to be long, so I would be online and a new post by Chris would come, and I'd be like "oh here we go again". Because it would fill up my timeline, and it wasn't practical either, because I would read the first paragraph, then wait until Chris typed the next paragraph, and in the meantime I might have seen other things and I had to go back to what I was reading 5 minutes ago and then wait 5 more minutes for the rest of his train of thought. This is not how any of this should work! A person should take their time and write down their thoughts, and then post them on their account. And I should be able to see the start of that post, and click on it and read it at its entirety if it seems interesting to me.

Why are we keeping up with an unnecessary limit, when there is no technical reason for it any more? Plain text takes practically zero disk space (and will take up the same space -basically more- if split in different posts). We post photos that take up kilobytes or megabytes.

When users are forced to go around your design in order to communicate their thoughts, this means there's something wrong with your design. There are people who prefer writing shorter posts. There are people who sometimes want to post something longer for their followers to read. It's still a post, it serves the exact same purpose, it's not like "posts MUST be short, anything over a paragraph is a blog post". I regularly write longer posts, because I want to expand on my thoughts. It doesn't mean I care about keeping a personal blog, or that I think anything longer I write is blog-worthy. I might be talking about whatever, and it can be as significant (or insignificant) as my one paragraph posts. It's even more futile to try to enforce a limit like that in an open network as the Fediverse. People will just build tools to overcome it, as has happened, and many platforms offer much longer character limits. Many Mastodon servers have also manually changed that limit, kolektiva.social for example is a Mastodon server with a 10K character limit. It comes from an actual need, people might also want to post an announcement or whatever longer text.

Basically, the only real reason I can think of for limits like that to exist in today's platforms, it's because short content is more easily "consumable". So I get it as a choice for #X or , they want addictive, fast-to-read content, witty responses etc to keep their users in their platforms for longer, to show them more ads and keep tracking their interactions for longer. And this is probably how they found out that this restriction is good for them and makes their platform more addictive. It's easier for them to "sell" easily digestable content. It makes sense as a design choice, for their corporate targets.

But why on fedi? If you don't care about longer posts, you can ignore them and not open them. If you prefer following people who only write short posts, then do that. If you don't like that I write longer posts, feel free to unfollow me, and customize your fedi experience to your needs. But why have made-up restrictions like that forced upon users? Are we building something for easily digestible content, trying to make it as addictive as possible, or are we here for communication, according to the users' needs?

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@panos since you ask I will answer.

To me, fediverse is like a conversation. Let's say you have a group of 10 people meeting for 1h. Attention is scarce so the group decide a 6 minutes/person express time so everyone can talk and be listened: it's a matter of respect.

When someone break the 500 limit, I feel it like someone in the above meeting just talking 40 minutes. I understand you want/need that to express yourself but... you do not respect the attention span people consented to give you.

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@atomicpoet @panos here we are confusing two things: "fediverse" and "the part of fediverse that propose microblogging". I don't by the "fediverse can be anything" stuff and I see it more like different stuff/experiences. "threadiverse" for example is a thing. Microblogging fedi is another made by people who want to read short posts. The blogging fedi is another. (1/2)

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@atomicpoet @panos It's not a whole. Different tools, different people, different expectations, different UX, different content and different cultures. Mastodon will never support events like Mobilizon does and that's ok. Its character limit is not a limit but a feature coming from a culture that values brievety, witness, laconism...

It's ok that the fedi is kind of split: we should not view the fedi as an everything app or it will fail 🤷 (2/2)

lutindiscret, to random
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

I'm not enthusiastic about campaign. What about a campaign: let's release the Meta, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Tinder, Spotify, Epic, Electronic Arts <insert your favorite billionaire owned company> code assets.

After all, those have been paid with our money too 🤷

AntennaPod, to random
@AntennaPod@fosstodon.org avatar

We're runner-up in the "best podcast app" vote by @9to5google staff!
https://9to5google.com/2024/04/02/favorite-android-apps-replace-google-podcasts
We're super proud to be able to provide such (ad-free) experience as a bunch of podcast enthusiasts doing it in their spare time.
Download or contribute here 👉 https://antennapod.org

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@AntennaPod I love AP, I use it weekly. Issues to me are:

  • in audio ads: we need a kind of @sponsorblock for podcasts
  • privacy: it seems like, even if i haven't consented to anything, the url of the RSS file or the URL AP will use to download the audio are under surveillance. Guess I'll have to set up a Tor proxy for AP or something 😔
nicolasvivant, to infosec French
@nicolasvivant@colter.social avatar

« Ce n’est pas tant que l’OSQI, ou quelque chose de semblable, soit une bonne idée ; c’est que ne pas essayer d’atteindre ces objectifs, en 2024, est dangereux et insensé. »

@timbray propose la création d'un OSQI (Open Source Quality Institute). J'ai traduit son article pour vous.

https://grenoble.ninja/osqi

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar
lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@nicolasvivant @fabrice en fait, @copiepublique (et moi) l'avions relayée. Fallait s'abonner 😉

lutindiscret, to reddit French
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar
32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245, to random
@32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245@mostr.pub avatar

most people think email is bad because the only client they’ve ever used is gmail

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7@mostr.pub have your heard of @delta?

lutindiscret, to random
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

Hi @tilvids 👋

Could you ask Andrea Borman to to join tilvids? She make linux tutorials and her vids are of a rare pure style: no sponsor, no ad, no nagging to subscribe, no stupid thumbnails, just pure knowledge delivered for joy.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJsinEiaDqEn8a-GcADVEVA

evan, to fediverse
@evan@cosocial.ca avatar

OK, I put up a proposal on #SummerOfProtocols for an #ActivityPub extension to implement end-to-end encryption of private messages.

https://forum.summerofprotocols.com/t/pig-end-to-end-encryption-in-activitypub/440

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

@evan I'm all-in for privacy but history seems to show that e2ee in federated+FLOSS+multidevice ecosystem is doomed to fail (or take decades?). XMPP fail after 20 years, Matrix is struggling too (and even if they fix all the issues, they will have to move to MLS and that will take years https://arewemlsyet.com/). Key-management is UX nightmare. GPG you suggest is obsolete.

I think fediverse/AP should better work on a protocol to negotiate/start an encrypted discussion using another e2ee protocol

lelibreedu, to random French
@lelibreedu@mastodon.mim-libre.fr avatar

Révélé à la la Forge des communs numériques éducatifs a un nouveau visuel que nous devons à Juliette Taka @juliettetaka

Choisie pour son talent et sa proximité avec le libre (autrice de thèmes Debian notamment) et dûment rémunérée par le ministère de l'Éducation nationale pour cela.

La fille s'appelle Brigit (déesse celte des forges d'après Wikipédia) et la castor Komit (qui construit collaborativement des barrages aux GAFAM).

Sous licence CC-BY.

https://forge.apps.education.fr/framaka/visuel-forge/

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

👏 👏 👏 @juliettetaka

@lelibreedu

velvetshadow, to Hololive French
@velvetshadow@shelter.moe avatar

Hello, je refais mon #introduction suite à mon changement d'instance ! 👋

Je suis #streamer partenaire sur #Twitch, et éditeur d'une newsletter dédiée au secteur du livestreaming (je vous épargne les liens, ils sont sur mon profil si jamais). 👍

Forte tendance à shitposter, mais jamais de choses potentiellement blessantes ou méchantes. Mes passions se résument à manger et dormir. :blobnomcookie:

Au plaisir de croiser de nouvelles personnes sympas, drôles & passionnantes ici ! :ablobdundundun:

lutindiscret,
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com avatar

👋 @velvetshadow

Juste pour être sûr que tu connais @owncast qui est le "twitch" libre et fédéré

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines