@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

psvrh

@psvrh@lemmy.ca

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

they don’t care. Their intent is to use the power of the state to suppress everyone else. They already have an answer for your concern and it’s an awful one.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

The market has solved it.

You just don’t realize what the market has solved for. It didn’t solve the problem of expensive healthcare, it solved the problem of how to maximize profits for the wealthy.

That’s what people don’t understand about “the market”. What you think it’s doing isn’t what it’s actually doing.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

This should tell you what absolute garbage most American administrations were for the working class.

FDR was the last president who was really afraid of Marxism at home, while Nixon was probably the last president even slightly afraid of the people.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Yes.

You aren’t going to get meaningful progressive change by just asking for it, and certainly not by hoping for it. The powerful need to be afraid that a worse alternative awaits them before they’ll acquiesce to sharing what they have.

"Nobody in the world, nobody in history, has ever gotten their freedom by appealing to the moral sense of the people who were oppressing them.” ― Assata Shakur

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Uh huh, a “mistake”.

Fucking hustlers…

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

You know what we could do, right?

Tax the rich and build public housing and supporting infrastructure at scale. And by “build” I don’t mean “give money to developers” I mean actually have the government employ people, buy equipment and run facilities.

Would it fix the problem? No. Would it help? Yes.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

I don’t think people realize how damaging having so much of our economy tied up in housing is causing:

  • It sucks up consumer demand. Can’t buy goods if all your money goes to rent or a mortgage
  • It eats startup capital. Can’t invest or run a business if you have no free income.
  • It incentivizes bad investment behaviour. This one gets me, the right-wing think tanks are always whinging about “productivity” but the biggest reason we’re not productive is that our investment class is dumping money into real estate because it provides a quick return, instead of investing it in technology or people
  • The income from it is not available for taxation, starving government revenues and resulting in programs getting cut

And that’s before you get to the social costs (people stuck in miserable marriages, stress, commuting requirements, loss of security, etc).

And here we are, throwing gasoline on the fire because our governments and their donors can’t bear to make less money. Quite the opposite, really, to keep the Ponzi scheme going they’re moving to strip-mining south Asian immigrants like they’re the human equivalent of an open-pit quarry.

When the collapses, it’ll be horrific. At best, I hope the recovery is more New Deal than Third Reich.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Property wealth–equity in general, frankly–isn’t taxable like income is (and neither is capital gains). If you hold property, you can use that equity to buy more property and accumulate more wealth, but since it isn’t income, it isn’t taxed by government the same way.

Yes, property taxes are a thing, and yes, we do tax capital gains, but not like we tax income or consumption. Allowing wealth and equity to snowball takes that money and marks it “off limits” to government. So government revenues drop and services decay.

I’d also add that our tax regime is incredibly unfair to labour, especially skilled labour. If you’re a high-earning worker, you’re taxed much more than someone who just lets their money accumulate through passive rent-seeking. If you wonder why Canada has a brain-drain issue, this is a good reason: it’s more advantageous to be a landlord than it is to be a doctor, engineer or other highly-paid, highly skilled professional.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

What does Jeff’s yacht cost? Half a billion? And he paid to widen a canal to dock it?

We do not tax these people anywhere near enough.

psvrh, (edited )
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

In the before times, when corporate and marginal income tax rates were high and stock buybacks were illegal, a business could do two things with its profit:

  • Reinvest it into the business, as employee compensation, equipment or facilities, and/or
  • Pay taxes.

In the 1980s, we gave them a third option:

  • Keep the money

…which for some reason was supposed to not encourage the rich to hoard money and/or engage in non-productive financialization.

The rich, of course, hoarded and engaged in financial engineering pretty much immediately, and everyone else, which meant employees, suffered for it.

Think about how stupid of an idea this is: giving the rich the ability to hoard money and then against all reason, somehow expecting that they won’t do the thing you’re incentivizing them to do. Even George Bush called it “voodoo economics”.

If you look at wages-vs-productivity curves you can see society “break” in the 1980s, with the rich running away with their wealth and everyone else getting stuck in a quagmire of low wages and starved public services.

So that’s why high progressive taxation helps employee: it forces the rich to either invest in their businesses or fund the nation.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

No, but a boy can dream…

psvrh, (edited )
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Huh. I had a Predator monitor that was diagnosed with mysterious “liquid damage” when it stopped working. Considering it’s well up and above the desk, that would have taken some work.

I’m wondering if I should try again?

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

The model should be Apple: yes, they’re expensive, but they’re also no-questions-asked. As long as your AppleCare is still valid:

  • Laptop stopped working? Just send it in for repair or come into the store, you get a new one.
  • Apple pencil won’t charge? We’ll send you a new one, send the us the old one back in a prepaid shipping container.
  • Screen cracked on your iPhone? Here’s the schedule of repair costs, we’ll send you a new one.
  • Dog chewed your airpod? Nominal fee for replacement and we’ll send you a new one first.

The problem is that Apple has the up-front margin to support this kind of thing. Asus et al don’t.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

The problem is that you’re charged for packaging, and the monitor is not exactly cheap.

psvrh, (edited )
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

I got divorced in the 2010s and it kicked me out of the housing market. I’d be five years from paying off my home now, but had to sell it as part of the separation. We bought it for $210K in 2009, sold for $225k in 2011. It flipped during the pandemic for $900k, as an “investment opportunity for GTA-area landlords looking for rental income”

That’s hard to watch, not just the money, but also seeing the trees I planted with my then-young kids cut down because the landlord needed another parking spot.

Since then, I’ve watched house prices accelerate away from me, so much so that I decided to just give up and bank everything into education savings for my kids in hopes that I’ll have a couch to sleep on in my old age. Even now that’s looking unlikely.

My now-spouse had it worse: when she divorced, she got to keep half of her then-husband’s previously-secret and significant debts, which more than wiped out any equity she had, putting her tens of thousands of dollars into the red. He, of course, got his debt halved.

I don’t doubt for a second the stats that tout rising domestic abuse rates since people become house-locked. I got divorced when rent was at least reasonable where I live. Now? Now the choice is between “a miserable, if not right dangerous, marriage” and “sleeping in a tent in a public park”.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

The problem is now that you risk living in a tent in a park, or in your 50s with roommates in a sketchy rooming house. It’s not just “poor” anymore, it’s that divorce can mean homelessness.

I don’t think people realize how badly out of control the housing market is. In much of the country, it’s not a matter of not being able to buy a home, it’s not even being able to rent one.

In the area where I live I can count four or five young couples and/or single parents who are raising kids in rooming houses. Other than one spectacular instance of substance abuse, they’re not “bad people”, and ten years ago they’d at least have been able to rent a space of their own to raise their kids, while thirty years ago they’d have been able to buy a starter home. Now? Now they’re raising children in rooming houses.

That’s not a good thing, but hey, at least landlords are doing well and Galen Weston’s making more money this year than last.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

I wasn’t aware that my standard of living was measured by the wealth I can produce for the nation, but I suppose that’s how the right-wing views everyone not of the ruling class: as a resource to be strip-mined.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

If by “organized crime" they mean “organized by Loblaws’ price gouging”, then yes.

But I suppose Mr Bread Price Fixing knows all about organized crime.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Not initially, no. They think they’re a few Neimollers away from no one speaking for them.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

So, when do churches that support Trump lose their tax-exemption status?

The inside story of Elon Musk’s mass firings of Tesla Supercharger staff (www.reuters.com)

May 15 (Reuters) - The day before Elon Musk fired virtually all of Tesla’s electric-vehicle charging division last month, they had high hopes as charging chief Rebecca Tinucci went to meet with Musk about the network’s future, four former charging-network staffers told Reuters....

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

That’s not a fair thing to say.

He’s also really good at stock manipulation.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

I can’t think of a less sexy place than a bathroom.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

It’s not Israel per se, it’s that these protests could metastasize into general anti-establishment ones. Israel is just the flashpoint.

In case you’re wondering why the authorities didn’t really care about the Convoy is because, frankly, most of the authorities agreed with them. Right-wing protests are inherently pro-establishment, and often have the tacit, if not explicit, support of the police, whereas left-wing protests certainly don’t. The tell, with the Convoy, is that no one was going to do anything until the Ambassador Bridge got blockaded: then it became about money. Otherwise, everyone was perfectly content to see rich, white suburbanites having a tantrum. Fascism, after all, can be good for business.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Wow, lebensraum, lugenpresse and endlosung. They’re, umm, really really trying…

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Imagine if the city/province just built housing, instead of bribing developers and landlords?

You know, like they used to before we had a housing crisis.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • everett
  • vwfavf
  • kavyap
  • provamag3
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • tester
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines