@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

ChaoticEntropy

@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Bitwarden is too functional and too affordable for me to really consider moving.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

No… we’re good…

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

“It works fine if you follow a 10 stage guide filled with terminal commands to configure it properly, which describes commands that are different in your distro.”

Cool.

ChaoticEntropy, (edited )
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

What possible reason would he have to do that…? If he wins, he gets off scot free. If he loses then he’ll claim that he won and is being suppressed for political reasons and then get of scot free.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

He won’t need to, it’ll be his “independent” department of justice calling the shots. Sessions and Barr did everything in their power, without committing actual explicit crimes, to keep Trump happy while they were in charge.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Heh. That’s cute. Pissing off players by cutting them off from their games has been going sooo well for them.

The ugly truth behind ChatGPT: AI is guzzling resources at planet-eating rates (www.theguardian.com)

Despite its name, the infrastructure used by the “cloud” accounts for more global greenhouse emissions than commercial flights. In 2018, for instance, the 5bn YouTube hits for the viral song Despacito used the same amount of energy it would take to heat 40,000 US homes annually....

ChaoticEntropy, (edited )
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

If someone wants to use a vibrator that consumes an entire city’s worth of yearly energy consumption each day then I’d say that they shouldn’t be allowed to do that. Making excessive energy consumption prohibitively expensive goes some way towards discouraging this at least.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Right, so the imperative to consume less power inspired the innovation needed to make it ultimately viable in the long term. Rather than people being left to consume infinite resources without a care in the world. Let’s hope that the imperative to be efficient and not use all resources all the time inspires this to also becoming viably efficient rather than regulators/officials just allowing it to spin out of control.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Did I say at some stage that I just want a flat, nuanceless ban on industries? I answered a hypothetical posed about individual’s personal consumption.

AI needs reigning in for so many different reasons, energy consumption or otherwise. Its utility to society is more than counterbalanced by the dangers that it and its unregulated expansion poses to that same society. If nothing else, government and industry bodies to catch up with it and impose appropriate standards.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Oh good… janky oversold systems that do a lot of automation on a very shaky basis are also having high impacts when screwing up.

Also “Facewatch” is such an awful sounding company.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Who the fuck wants this…? Besides the company raking in venture capital money.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

It’s not an overly sustainable service at the scale it is running.

ChaoticEntropy, (edited )
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

If that’s what you’re trying to express then I kind of feel like you miswrote your comment. You want them to focus on browser features but not continue to add features? You don’t feel like there’s any room for confusion there?

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

It’s not you. It’s ridiculous that they’re this indignant.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

The proportion of good content to bad content has taken a steep nosedive to be sure.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

“We need you to reconsider… because we already did it and we’re just looking for your stamp of approval after the fact.”

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

The implication being that this is the deal that the AI boom is offering, it’s not necessarily an endorsement of that philosophy by the writer.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Okay.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Corporations are as callous and mechanical as they have always been, with an ever expanding range of tools to exploit. They will do anything and everything they can unless it is less profitable to do it.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

If by “forgiveness” you mean an avoidance of legal liability, sure. :P

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Their chance to do what…? This was always about handing them a gravy train.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

How many knives can a disaffected teen carry/throw per minute?

I wouldn’t seek to downplay how much damage a sufficiently motivated individual with a knife can do in a short space of time, but it is certainly orders of magnitude lower than a firearm in most cases.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

Unwilling due to their fear. Of their donors, of their electorate, of losing control. Pick your poison.

ChaoticEntropy,
@ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk avatar

A small subset of the electorate sure, made fearful… by grifters, agenda led news, and arms manufacturers who want to sell them guns.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines