lobster2, to RSS

Dear Friends of RSS,

In my to be a -Nerd, I am trying to use . It seems a good way of and relevant to me rather than , or biased social media?

As usual, I nothing about it, just familiar with its symbol ...
So far I have an RSS program, and tried to make sense of them or at least use in some way ...

I may be too to use the interneti-neti:

rlcj, to history
@rlcj@mstdn.social avatar

My first #principles?

  1. Deliver #university #history modules I’d have loved to take
  2. Make them #relevant to the #modern #world
  3. Make them #beautiful

Let’s roll! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hrwRAjCr_lA

And if anyone is in any doubt about the answer to the #question then it is a definitive NO! #Historians have got so much to offer in charting a way forward for humanity. #EnvHist #Famine #Anthropocene #Deforestation #Soil #Erosion #Biodiversity #Loss #Pollution #Floods #FossilFuels

petersuber, to ai

From #LorcanDempsey:
https://lorcandempsey.net/generative-ai-a-note-about-content/amp/

"We are moving…into the 3d front of #OpenAccess, [which] is not about…articles, journals, publishers or deals, but…#AI-powered exploration of…research…(to include literature, data, people, organizations). (Taking Green and Gold as first two fronts…) Large [#publishers] are…well placed to offer a new level of access. But to whom & on what terms?…If/when interaction w/ the lit shifts in this way, then thinking about…open access…also needs to evolve."

petersuber,

@benjamingeer @Transportist
I don't know how ChatGPT might be weeding out fake citations. But I've speculated that it's a tractable problem:

"Determining whether an assertion is #true is a hard problem…But determining whether a #citation points to a real publication and whether it's #relevant to the passage citing it, are comparatively easy."
https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/110017707003960916

pre, to random

Had to launch Chrome and it pops up offering to serve me more relevant ads if I'm turn on some setting.

No thanks.

I don't really want to see adverts at all, but if there must be adverts then I'd sooner they are irrelevant adverts for things I'll definitely never buy.

The more relevant an advert is the more likely it is to manipulate me into buying something I don't need.

I dunno why the big tech people seem to think we want adverts that are more relevant to us. That's what the manipulating advertisers want, not the what the manipulated advertised-at people want.

Aslanmane, to art
@Aslanmane@pixelfed.social avatar
petersuber, to ai

Good start on a hard question — how or whether to use tools in .
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2587766/v1

"For the moment, we recommend that if are used to write scholarly reviews, reviewers should disclose their use and accept full responsibility for their reports’ accuracy, tone, reasoning and originality."

PS: "For the moment" these tools can help reviewers string words together, not judge quality. We have good reasons to seek evaluative comments from human experts.

petersuber,

Update. I'm sure this has occurred to #AI / #LLM tool builders. Determining whether an assertion is #true is a hard problem and we don't expect an adequate software solution any time soon, if ever. But determining whether a #citation points to a real publication and whether it's #relevant to the passage citing it, are comparatively easy. (Just comparatively.)

Some tools already cite sources. But when will tools promise that their citations are real and relevant — and deliver on that promise?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines