This thought triggered by looking at this and wanting to post "This is me. It's me. I'm the OS/2 Grandma" but then I realized I have absolutely no qualifications to self-describe as an OS/2 Grandma. https://botsin.space/@postcardware/110750191405897940
@mcc It was useless. Interesting sound engine, programming model that was incompatible with everything else (so porting networking software was a pain).
Booted into it, multimedia playback was worse than OS/2. OpenGL was interesting, but unaccelerated. Printing and network systems pathetic. Hardware support really dire (and that's coming from an OS/2 user!).
That was BeOS x86. BeOS PPC is even more useless, and ran on about five systems. Have it here on a Powermac 4400/200.
@mcc i used it in 2006 in my college radio station and fell in love. It sucks how useless it was outside of the automation software, sadly, just because of the modern internet at the time. Said software switched to using Haiku around 2014 but still has a weird license where you can't use it if you promote witchcraft or anything "new-age"
@mcc I was one of the folks who bought a BeBox. Kept it a couple months and then returned it. A lot of hype, although some of it lives on in macOS. The choice of C++ as the application programming APIs would have come back to haunt them.
@mcc IDK the more different operating systems or programming languages I use the more I hate all operating systems or programming languages. Every time something shows up with a good feature it just makes me able to stand using the other ones less. So in a sense you dodged a bullet!
@mcc Closest I got was running BeOS R5 Personal -- it shipped as maybe a VM? You ran it from Windows line an exe and it booted you into the OS. No developer tools or codecs, so super limited.
To this day I want tabbed window titlebars and nobody does it.
Add comment