Clinton "may still possess" classified information is not a valid argument. First, in using "still," it begs the question. It also assumes that, were he to retain information, it would be wrongful.
Second, anyone might possess something: I might possess the Holy Grail. The odds that I do, however, are lower than my winning the lottery. More is needed.
Third, it's irrelevant. On its face, stopping one of a dozen speeding cars is not discrimination.
@Brandi_Buchman For the sake of argument, let’s say it’s true. Then isn’t this pleading akin to someone charged with bank robbery saying their case should be tossed because another bank robber got away with it?
As to the substance, in 2016 he kept asserting that the Clintons and their foundation were doing shady things. History has shown, especially re: non-profits, Trump’s statements are confessions in accusation clothing.
Add comment