mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

There was a time, when I dearly loved #TerryPratchett and #DouglasAdams, and they will always have a sweet spot in my heart for the many laughs and for all the cultural heritage, they left us.

However: Whenever I now grab one of their #books, their style and language feels terribly outdated and, frankly, boring to me.

Unpopular opinion, or do you agree?

ab78702,
@ab78702@fosstodon.org avatar

@mina I don't quite agree. These two authors plus @neilhimself write stuff that appeal to me no matter how many times I've read it. For Douglas Adams I can somewhat understand as was a bit overplayed (plus is not my thing) but otoh, the Dirk Gently holistic detective series is a lot more enjoyable and timeless to me.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@ab78702

It's totally fine. I was just curious, if other "fans" had the same feeling as I.

So far, not so many.

@neilhimself

NormanDunbar,
@NormanDunbar@mastodon.scot avatar

@mina I respectfully disagree. I've been reading Terry's books for decades. I still enjoy them today.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@NormanDunbar

This is totally fine. I have enjoyed them so much in the past, and I totally get it.

If I am becoming senile or so, you don't have to.

NormanDunbar,
@NormanDunbar@mastodon.scot avatar

@mina Mind you, it has been said that I have a weird sense of humour, which might explain the attraction.

Have a great day.

VulcanTourist,
@VulcanTourist@mastodon.social avatar

@mina

What about Piers Anthony?

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@VulcanTourist

I don't think I have read anything by him.

PeterPractice,
@PeterPractice@toot.community avatar

@mina agree

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@PeterPractice

You're one of very few. 🤜 🤛

skittles,
@skittles@berlin.social avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • skittles,
    @skittles@berlin.social avatar

    But to be honest, while I love the world and the characters of Discworld, I never found him to be a strong writer. I like a few books, but there’s a whole lot of filler material in his work, and I think he peaked in the late 80s early 90s.

    mina,
    @mina@berlin.social avatar

    @skittles

    With Pratchett's peak years being the late 80s/early 90s, I totally agree.

    I'd like to add: If somebody has a thing for absurd humour and/or likes SF and doesn't know either of the two, I would still recommend them.

    Their works are just part of the canon.

    ManniCalavera,
    @ManniCalavera@openbiblio.social avatar

    @mina I love Pratchett just as the next guy, but some books are just better than others. I remember that Moving Pictures and Soul Music were very labored, and the Nightwatch books were always a hit, except "Guards! Guards!", which was merely good.
    So maybe you picked a "wrong" one?

    mina,
    @mina@berlin.social avatar

    @ManniCalavera

    As I said: I've been a huge fan in the past, so I don't think, the specific selection is the problem.

    It's also not that I consider Pratchett to be bad, just as somewhat dated.

    TheNovemberMan,
    @TheNovemberMan@bookstodon.com avatar

    @mina I still occasionally re-read both, with a smile.
    But just my opinion.

    mina,
    @mina@berlin.social avatar

    @TheNovemberMan

    Totally fine! As long as you enjoy them, please do so!

    spidermedic,
    @spidermedic@techhub.social avatar

    @mina Sure digital watches are outdated, but Douglas Adams’ story telling and use of language is funny every time I read it.

    mina,
    @mina@berlin.social avatar

    @spidermedic

    The digital watches and other anachronisms don't hurt, IMO.

    It's rather his language, I find too chatty and not really funny any more.

    agitatra,
    @agitatra@berlin.social avatar

    @mina I'd agree that Terry Pratchett became a little bit repetitive later, but reading Douglas Adams is for me as funny as it was forty years ago.

    mina,
    @mina@berlin.social avatar

    @agitatra

    That's great! I remember, how much I enjoyed reading him, back in the days.

    If you could keep that feeling: Perfect!

    claralistensprechen3rd,

    @mina Nope. I expect you're bored because you've already read them.
    Their wordcraft remains timeless.

    mina,
    @mina@berlin.social avatar

    @claralistensprechen3rd

    The thing is: I love re-reading books.

    There are hundreds, I read twice and at least a few dozen, I read five times and still some, I read more than ten times.

    So, I don't think this is the issue.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • books
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines