@pylapp ...the way is to make those tools responsible and according to our rules/regulations, AI tools will never go away, too much added value for that.
@ErikJonker History has shown regulations is not working enough. USA or UE for example did not succeed in making some GAFAM, NATU or BATX change. There is no added value provided by AI tools. We did not need them before, we won’t need them today or tomorrow. AI can help for intensive and big computations tasks like before.
@pylapp AI is for a large part opensource, already being used everywhere (whether it has added value or not is another question), but it will not go away, regulating is the only option. I agree that it is hard.
@ErikJonker “AI is for a large part opensource” means nothing. Which AI? Which tools? Which models?
Llama 2, Bard, Claude 2, GPT-4 are not open source at all.
It’s time to be lucid: this type of tools don’t help users, kill the planet and are based on stolen materials only to make some companies earn more money. That’s all.
@pylapp ... we can't enforce that this technology can and will not be used, that's a fantasy. A lot is closed source but also a part is opensource, everybody can implement and use it on their own.
Add comment