@ProPublica It would be one thing if conservatives were challenging the rather vague definition of pornography, i.e. "I know it when I see it." Maybe a more specific definition would be helpful.
But they aren't doing that. Instead they are using it to go after Black History and books about LGBT issues that are helpful for students who want to learn something without asking the Internet.
@ProPublica I've been staring at this story and wondering how any remotely reasonable person can even momentarily equate a crayon without its paper wrapper with nudity that might harm children.
(Kudos to that author for a damn cute story idea! 🖍️)
Not on the same planet? These people aren't even in the same universe. (Their celestial bodies - oh noes, a dirty word! - are all clothed.)
@ProPublica
“... unfortunately, we have seen more and more books that promote and support LBGTQ+ views ... exposing young children to adult topics. ... We want... children [to] hang on to their innocence....
... Implying that same-sex love is "adult" and "guilty". How this must poison the minds of kids who have LGBTQI+ kinfolk!
Add comment