jmsdnns

jmsdnns, 2 days ago

@dabeaz i agree with the point you're making, but there's also this guy https://youtu.be/yQ2dvtMuFqs?t=85s

jmsdnns, 2 days ago

@dabeaz i'd even say that if someone plays a wrong note in a solo, they should do it again. folks will think it's intentional 😅

jmsdnns, 2 days ago

@dabeaz pretty sure this is how blues scales were born! lol

jmsdnns, 2 days ago

@dabeaz @elhult i once heard idle processors repeatedly ask for the GIL

jmsdnns, 3 days ago

@benroyce they should all read Childhood's End, by Arthur C Clarke https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhood%27s_End

jmsdnns, 3 days ago

@benroyce I should elaborate. the tech bros are essentially trying to give us a tech based communist revolution, where they give us utopia and we give up automomy. the generated information could easily be filled with propaganda and it is unlikely we'd ever know, perhaps writing it off as hallucinations.

and yet, the same people dont care about helping hungry people on the streets of SF

jmsdnns, 5 days ago

@bitprophet JeffGPT

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@fedwards9965 @paninid BUT, the real value of saying "white man's suffrage", as absurd as it is for us in 2024, is because it leads right up to the way southern elites lied to their population to get them to fight in the civil war.

The southern elites pitched the war as "equality for white men" to states where ~70% of working white men worked in slave based industry.

THOSE people didn't think that war was about slavery. They believed they'd escape poverty, eg. white men's suffrage 🤮

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@fedwards9965 @paninid I hope this was interesting. I only just realized I'm infodumping to a stranger online. ✌️ 🖖 🤘

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@ramsey @paninid @fedwards9965 He is definitely best known today for the brutal trail of tears, but the consensus among historians seems to be that, relative to his era, he was 51% good and 49% evil.

I'll share some of the things he did that historians regard as good, where "good" is wildly subjective but generally centered around defending the constitution and the nation.

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@ramsey @paninid @fedwards9965 the first, and possibly the most shocking, is that he was seen as the second george washington because of how badly he wrecked the brits at the end of the war of 1812. Check the casualties & woundings in the link and you'll see it wasn't even close.

The Brits never stopped fucking with the US, especially on sea, but Jackson stopped all of that.

This ushered in the only period in US history without war, called the era of good feelings!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_New_Orleans

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@ramsey @paninid @fedwards9965 Jackson hated banks and banking, so he became friends with Aaron Burr entirely because he shot Hamilton, creator of the first national bank. Through that, he learned of Burr and Wilkinson's plot to sever land from the US to create a new nation and Jackson wrote to President Jefferson to tell him about it while promising to defend the nation. He testified as a witness in the Burr's trial for treason where John Marshall defined "treason" for the first time in US law

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@ramsey @paninid @fedwards9965 John C Calhoun was first exposed to ideas about secession during his time at Yale in 1804, where Federalists were exploring it essentially because they hated Jeffersonians. Many years later, Calhoun becomes John Quincy's VP and also Jackson's and he mentions secession once to Jackson who promptly lost his notorious temper so badly that historians say it delayed the civil war by 30 years because it scared the shit out of Calhoun, who quit his job as VP and went home

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@ramsey @paninid @fedwards9965 The main detail that makes Jackson unusual relative to the early 1800's south was his fierce loyalty to the union. IMO, that loyalty emerges from two things: British soldiers tortured him as a child, which is why he wrecked them so hard in the war of 1812, giving him a furious blend of trauma and narcissism tightly coupled with stories about defending the nation.

His narcissism is arguably why he is a little more good than bad, which is a mindfuck

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@ramsey @paninid @fedwards9965 one of my favorite anecdotes about Jackson is that when he got in duels he would stand still and let the other side shoot first. he actually got shot because of this and spent his life with a lead ball very close to his heart.

Jackson's reason for doing this was to avoid rushing the shot. He wanted the other side to rush, reducing their aim, and then he'd take his time and nail the shot in response.

He was completely fucking nuts and I dont know say that lightly

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@fedwards9965 @ramsey @paninid well said! Canada was considered part of England at the time, so it can all be said to be a war with england, but to your point, Canada beat the US over and over. It was true years later when the border for Maine was settled too.

Underappreciated anecdote from the war of 1812 is that the brits burned the white house and pissed on the ashes.

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@fedwards9965 @ramsey @paninid one way to think about it is that the US fought hard for years to win their independence, but Canada asked for it and England said, "yeah ok better than fighting" :D

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@fedwards9965 @ramsey @paninid well said! that's basically right as far as my knowledge goes!

I only know some Canadian history as a side-effect of reading US history. I want to study Canada at some point, but I'm halfway through a long, chronological march through US Presidential bios right now, so might be a while too

jmsdnns, 15 days ago

@fedwards9965 @ramsey @paninid irc, australia had a similar experience. they basically for asked for independence and england said yeah ok