During Saturday Finland's cops decided to defend infamous NATO war criminal dictator Erdoğan from "defamation" by a puppet at a demo in defence of the democratic confederalist, feminist, peaceful co-eistence in diversity, ecological self-liberated Norrth and East Syria ("Rojava") held in Helsinki, before the puppet had even been used at the demo so no "defamation" could possibly have been committed yet,
but now Finland has become so subservient in its defence of Putin's buddy and fellow wars of aggression chemical warfare user Erdoğan that even the hint of a thought that might make the ISIL-collaborator annoyed is treated as if it was in Turkey, where e.g. a 96-year-old was sentenced to indefinite forced hospitalization for "insulting the president" in a video recorded without permission wherein no name was mentioned.
Welcome to NATO, where the price of freedom is your freedoms and the price of security is you becoming less safe.
The police say the police will investigate the police's confiscation of an Erdoğan-dummy because it could have been used to commit defamation against the infamous dictator at a demo in Helsinki during Saturday, reports Public Service broadcaster YLE.
They confiscated the dummy before it had been used at all at the demo.
After investigating itself, police now declare that the presence of the Erdoğan-dummy that they confiscated before it could be used in a dance routine during a protest in Helsinki in March was not a crime, by taking credit for it not being used,
still claiming that it would have been used for defamation because they had heard a rumor that the dummy of the unconvicted war criminal was going to be smeared with blood, but since they confiscated it before it could be used for expression of opinion it became attempted defamation and that is not a crime.
Continuing its investigation of itself for thought crime policing against democracy and in aid of continuing war crimes, the National Police Board of Finland now declared that it was not right for the cops to confiscate Erdoğan dummy because they (claim to have) heard a rumor that it would be used as a part of a protest that they decided could be felt as insulting by the crimes against humanity culprit, while the protesters' actual plan was for dancing.
Or, in the Board's own words "Whereas the fact that the police have a lawful and socially desirable motive for their actions does not in itself justify the action of the police, which must have a ground for jurisdiction in law".
And if someone deprives someone else of their thing without it having "ground for jurisdiction in law", the police and courts would commonly call it...
theft.
But they're cops, so they're expected to commit authoritarian abuse, attacks against democracy and other crimes and get away with it.
It's fine. It's FINE! It's fine or you're fined.
Add comment