jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

I actually think it would sort of rock if someone made it structurally unsafe to default host things on amazon by selectively making renting s3 buckets obscenely expensive by pointlessly scraping from them all the time

fm_volker,
@fm_volker@mastodon.social avatar

@jonny Or at least it would force people to develop adequate strategies (rate limiting etc) that would also be useful in different settings, because even if the data is not in S3, the cost has to be SOMEWHERE, maybe behind/on your uplink, and you'd need to defend there as well.

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

@fm_volker
Ok yes efficient software is also good but Fuck Amazon In Particular

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

"Dont choose AWS bc the hackers have made it a liability" would be an ethical and eminently practical stance for hackers to take

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

Obviously that would drive ordinary web hosting consumers to alternative platforms and mediums, which would be a real shame

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

distributed denial of a company buying ownership of the future by collateralizing the externalities of said ownership.

The "make it expensive to own it" method

aud,

@jonny only vaguely related tangent, but lately I keep thinking that with the tech cartels dominating search and email we’re basically free to create our own second gay/punk/anarchist internet that they literally won’t touch.

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

@aud
The Gay Internet is very much Afoot and we are very much On It

aud,

@jonny (I had a similar thought about 5 minutes after I posted this)

Now we need gaymail, etc.

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

@aud
Who owns mail.gay and for that matter where is the whole ass domain registrar and why arent they some kind of next level fedi deity

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

@aud
Asta can we along with @lina do a whole TLD

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

@aud
@lina
What Is the the minimal organizational unit capable of a TLD and why does it always need someone with money

lina,
@lina@neuromatch.social avatar

@jonny
@aud
I still think kickstarting a .con tld to do ethically squatted/phished domains is a legit good idea

aud,

@jonny although it would be hilarious to watch how fast Google would allow emails from a provider that specifically touted incompatibility with Gmail as a feature

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

@aud
Remember our marketing, we call it pity for gmail

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines