DanielMReck,
@DanielMReck@mas.to avatar

#ScienceDirect and #Elsevier clearly didn't review this #chemistry paper about #batteries. The intro starts with "Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic:".

This lack of oversight erodes #trust in #science. The paper needs to be retracted and the authors sanctioned immediately.

#GenerativeAI may have its uses in #academic #writing, but this is uncited #plagiarism and #dishonest claim of original work. The #AI and #LLM don't have an #author credit.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024002402

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • chemistry
  • ethstaker
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • InstantRegret
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • cisconetworking
  • kavyap
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • rosin
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • cubers
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines