littlebluespark

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

Something tells me that meow sounds like “brro.”

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

<These are not the dongs you’re looking for.>

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

Seems like downtime in a Souls game.

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

Thafuq is a self-identified “not news, but entertainment” media source doing in this community?

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

That’s an odd way to spell “spoon feeding a bunch of hateful cunts”, but I’ll allow it.

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

Damn. That’s some nice work, fo sho.

(Is there a way to follow Mastadon users via Sync for Lemmy?)

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

No.

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

Heh. 3d printer still going brrrrrrr ✊🏽

littlebluespark, 27 days ago

Sony

littlebluespark, 28 days ago

Yes?

littlebluespark, 28 days ago

Take my money! 🤩✨🧞‍♀️

littlebluespark, 29 days ago

how much money was refunded. Doesn’t even get into the number of buyers they are excluding.

The personal data of each player they do coerce into signing into PSN is far more lucrative than said game sales. Sony is into gaming as much as Santa is into manufacturing toys, FFS. 🤦🏽‍♂️

littlebluespark, 28 days ago

The “argument” is to set precedent for denying refunds when they attempt to force users to sign into PSN before playing. Before, the simple fact that this was not made clear at point of purchase is a breach of contract on the part of the seller, and grounds for immediate refund of the improperly described terms of use. 😶

littlebluespark, 28 days ago

On average… couple bucks… each person

Assuming you’re not high as balls, please cite your sources. Additionally, by implying that each individual “person” is not already commodified as a body of data in a collection of similar is woefully naive. I know it’s a common desire to weigh in on topics and feel that one’s contribution is valid and worthy, but please look into this subject further before pulling sentences like these outta your ass. 🤪

littlebluespark, 29 days ago

Yeah, I’m sure the Sony dry-fuckery has nothing to do with them limping off

littlebluespark, 28 days ago

That’s rare.

littlebluespark, 29 days ago

Same. 😅🤌🏽

littlebluespark, 29 days ago

Sadly, it’ll just get sorted by new as default and will never be seen by the cast majority of spastic glances. 🤷🏼‍♂️

littlebluespark, 29 days ago

Are you fucking high? Some self-appointed Lorax for the Helldiver community here? Sounds pretty undemocratic of you, citizen.

littlebluespark, 28 days ago

children…

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/90ae7f52-aa97-4d44-a04a-b760e64eb9be.gif

littlebluespark, 30 days ago

Oh? See, now that makes me wanna design a whole set of French maid custodes. 🤌🏽

littlebluespark, 30 days ago

But wow I do not really want to play with him.

To be fair, he’s “playing” as much as someone texting America’s Got Talent is on the judges panel. He’s a glorified audience member that’s taking up a seat, and I highly doubt the rest of the table feel as nonchalant about this petulant no-effort view of his.

littlebluespark, 30 days ago

The downvotes are by people I would clearly hate to have at my table, and the infantile selfism at the core of their justification is despicable.

littlebluespark, 29 days ago

you have crazies with the guns.

Thafuq do you think the cops are‽

littlebluespark, 29 days ago

I prefer to assume any argument is made in good faith until proven otherwise, so please understand that the following criticisms are contextual and not, of course, personal.

The cops are armed because everyone else is armed

Bullshit. That implies that vast majority of interactions cops have with “everyone” else (ignoring the obvious hyperbole) while on the clock are with other armed people, which is not only patently false but dangerously presumptive in a grossly negligent way. In fact, the statement is so irrational that any statistic even comparing fatality rates between armed & unarmed individuals by cops would entirely debunk it; cops are not armed “because” others are, they’re armed first and foremost — and have been, since the very concept of a “police force” was first invented, FFS.

Demilitarisation of the police force can only come in…

Considering your failure to grasp the predicating concept, I’m hesitant to trust that you got the key in hand here.

…a sensible conversation about your gun ownership.

Again, this doesn’t seem to be in your wheelhouse at the moment.

It’s not like owning guns actually protects you from bad cops.

Logical fallacy and bait, not to mention an oversimplification of the actual issues at play.

So, do you want to have an adult conversation or just bark across the pond (where we’ll be touching on various police issues y’all have on your island yonder, to be sure), hmm?