Kihbernetics

@Kihbernetics@qoto.org

#Kihbernetics is the study of #Complex #Dynamical #Systems with #Memory which is very different from all other #SystemsThinking approaches. Kihbernetic theory and principles are derived primarily from these three sources:

1️⃣ #CE_Shannon's theory of #Information and his description of a #Transducer,
2️⃣ #WR_Ashby's #Cybernetics and his concept of #Transformation, and
3️⃣ #HR_Maturana's theory of #Autopoiesis and the resulting #Constructivism

Although applicable to any dynamical system with memory (mechanisms, organisms, or organizations) we developed our Kihbernetic worldview mostly to help people navigate their #organization through times of #change.

We define* an organization as:

"An integrated composite of people, products, and processes that provide a capability to satisfy a stated need or objective."

*Definition of the word "system" in MIL_STD_499B

#People are at the forefront of our thinking (the #who and #why are we doing this for and/or with?).

We then focus our efforts on understanding all the functions or #Processes in your organization (#how and #when something happens or has to happen?).

Finally, we get to analyze the #Products and/or services that you put on the market but are mostly interested in the tools that you use or may need to buy or develop in order to fully integrate your production system (the plan for #what and #where things will happen?).

Our goal is to make the people of your organization self-reliant to the point that they shouldn't need our assistance with the continuous maintenance and adaptation of the system.

In any case, we've got your back while you do the heavy lifting of establishing a better future for your organization!

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Kihbernetics, to random

A Springer Open access book from @decidim

Decidim, a Technopolitical Network for Participatory Democracy

Philosophy, Practice and Autonomy of a Collective Platform in the Age of Digital Intelligence

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-50784-7

antlerboy, to random
@antlerboy@mastodon.social avatar
Kihbernetics,

@antlerboy

Morozov:

“That’s why I find the legacy of the Cybersyn Project and Stafford Beer to be a very promising avenue for reinventing what socialism of the 21st century should be.”

No, it’s not. A better world is built on #trust, not on “cybernetic management principles”. Giving decision-makers “chairs with a set of futuristic buttons, a cigar ashtray, and space for a whisky tumbler built into the armrest” does not exactly project a picture that they may have the workers’ best interests in mind.

Medina has a much better understanding of the whole Cybersyn thing and the role technology plays in creating a better world:

1️⃣ Government can shape innovations to benefit the whole of society
2️⃣ Design bias can limit democracy and inclusion
3️⃣ Older technology can solve problems
4️⃣ Privacy is critical
5️⃣ Innovation alone does not build a better world

https://jacobin.com/2015/04/allende-chile-beer-medina-cybersyn/

Kihbernetics,

@antlerboy

That’s what I’m trying to say.

Impressions are important, and Cybersyn projected an unhelpful technocratic elitist aura that was in the end seized by its opponents and helped in ending the whole thing.
Morozov pushes the narrative that the reason the experiment failed was all because of the “evil capitalist West” interference but, IMO if it was that great it would endure whatever was thrown on it.

It is always the same, developers (innovators) build #products that satisfy themselves, not #people they are supposedly developing it for.

And people are not only symbolically more important, they are realistically much more important than technology. Especially in a revolution.

Kihbernetics,

@antlerboy

I was looking for more info on “Cyberfolk” and found this interesting article from Morozov in which parts sounds to me as if they came straight out of Orwell’s “1984”😀, with the “algedonic meter” dial in every household and all that.

As I suspected “Cyberfolk” was just “window dressing” as Beer had no idea how to implement “workers’ participation” in Cybersyn, so instead of starting from the bottom and solving problems where “the rubber hits the road” by increasing popular involvement, they all concentrated on the “easy” development of the Ops Room for top bureaucrats.

As Morozov points out in his article “Project Cybersyn could at least provide graphic designers with full employment” 😀

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/10/13/planning-machine

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • osvaldo12
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • everett
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • tester
  • lostlight
  • All magazines