estelle, to random
@estelle@techhub.social avatar

The terrible human toll in Gaza has many causes.
A chilling investigation by +972 highlights efficiency:

  1. An engineer: “When a 3-year-old girl is killed in a home in Gaza, it’s because someone in the army decided it wasn’t a big deal for her to be killed.”

  2. An AI outputs "100 targets a day". Like a factory with murder delivery:

"According to the investigation, another reason for the large number of targets, and the extensive harm to civilian life in Gaza, is the widespread use of a system called “Habsora” (“The Gospel”), which is largely built on artificial intelligence and can “generate” targets almost automatically at a rate that far exceeds what was previously possible. This AI system, as described by a former intelligence officer, essentially facilitates a “mass assassination factory.”"

  1. "The third is “power targets,” which includes high-rises and residential towers in the heart of cities, and public buildings such as universities, banks, and government offices."

🧶

estelle,
@estelle@techhub.social avatar

In 2019, the Israeli army created a special unit to create targets with the help of generative AI. Its objective: volume, volume, volume.
The effects on civilians (harm, suffering, death) are not a priority: https://www.972mag.com/mass-assassination-factory-israel-calculated-bombing-gaza/

#lawful #compliance #governance #anthropology #tech #techCulture #engineering #engineers #ethics @ethics #sociology @sociology #bias #AI #AITech #aiEthics #generativeAI #chatBots @ai @psychology @socialpsych #StochasticParrots @dataGovernance @data

cazabon, to math

Yes, I use strong .

Why, no, I don't have anything to .

I also my in , rather than on the backs of .

No, I don't have anything to hide there, either.

encryption.

There is no such thing as " ". Encryption is . There is no math that the "good guys" can do but which cannot be done by the "bad guys".

Anyone who suggests different is , to on you.

them.

IAmDannyBoling, to InitialD
@IAmDannyBoling@mstdn.social avatar

"Terán… refused to comply with the commands of the troopers to come out of a tent."

Really?
So then PROVE Terán shot first, motherfuckers!

PROVE IT, GODDAMMIT! 🤬

oh, that's right...

YOU CAN'T because "there is no police of the incident."

Goddamn terrorists. 🤬

https://truthout.org/articles/georgia-prosecutor-refuses-to-charge-state-troopers-who-killed-tortuguita/
Refuses to Charge Who

privacat, to Futurology

is having a very bad year. The latest decision (issued by the yesterday in Meta Platforms Inc, et al., v. Bundeskartellamt, C-C252/21) adds to their woes, but more importantly, I anticipate it will force us all to re-evaluate , bases, special category data, and derived from that data.

In my article, I explore the case in detail, as well as some hypotheses on the impact of this decision broadly to , with examples.

But I'm curious to hear your thoughts and observations. Am I being a Cassandra? Overly pessimistic? Completely overthinking this? What implications am I missing?

I'll note here (even though I didn't mention it in the article) that this may also portend the effective death of the One Stop Shop mechanism, which is already on shaky ground after the whole spat between the and other regulators. Who needs Ireland if competition authorities can also raise issues under the GDPR?

CJEU case: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf?mode=DOC&pageIndex=0&docid=275125&part=1&doclang=FR&text=&dir=&occ=first&cid=62013

Substack: https://careylening.substack.com/p/metas-wakeup-call-and-big-techs-new

maugendre, to dataGovernance
@maugendre@hachyderm.io avatar

I just published:
Enforcement of data protection is arriving. You may take the opportunity to upgrade your practice. Here is a slide deck to accompany you: http://data.yt/

Annexed recommendations include https://xot.nl/privacy-is-hard/: the excellent book by @xot

@dataGovernance @data

maugendre, to dataGovernance
@maugendre@hachyderm.io avatar

Actors in EU laws:
"The end user and recipient of the service are both natural and legal persons using a certain service. However, the recipient of the service can be a person acting in a personal or commercial/professional capacity whereas the end user can only be a person acting in a personal capacity."

https://www.dlapiper.com/en-gb/insights/publications/2022/08/whos-who-under-the-dma-dsa-dga-and-data-act by Heidi , a and lawyer

@data @dataGovernance

maugendre,
@maugendre@hachyderm.io avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • DreamBathrooms
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • InstantRegret
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • tester
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines