astrid, 2 months ago these 4TB drives are showing up as 0B and it seems to be because they have a blocksize of 520b instead of 512b
these 4TB drives are showing up as 0B and it seems to be because they have a blocksize of 520b instead of 512b
pascaldragon, 2 months ago @astrid so they were (supposed to be) used together with Data Integrity it seems? 🤔 ( https://docs.kernel.org/block/data-integrity.html )
@astrid so they were (supposed to be) used together with Data Integrity it seems? 🤔 ( https://docs.kernel.org/block/data-integrity.html )
astrid, 2 months ago @pascaldragon well, i'm reformatting them to be 512 anyways because i'm raiding them
@pascaldragon well, i'm reformatting them to be 512 anyways because i'm raiding them
pascaldragon, 2 months ago @astrid and your raid probably doesn't support that feature? 🤔 Good point 😅
@astrid and your raid probably doesn't support that feature? 🤔 Good point 😅
astrid, 2 months ago @pascaldragon i mean, software raiding lol
@pascaldragon i mean, software raiding lol
pascaldragon, 2 months ago @astrid MDADM, Intel or AMD? 🤔 And they can't handle that? 😲
@astrid MDADM, Intel or AMD? 🤔 And they can't handle that? 😲
astrid, 2 months ago @pascaldragon idk i'm just running linux
@pascaldragon idk i'm just running linux
tara, 2 months ago @astrid 520b wasn't the IBM format?
@astrid 520b wasn't the IBM format?
astrid, 2 months ago @tara apparently it's common in enterprise drives?
@tara apparently it's common in enterprise drives?
izaya, 2 months ago @astrid @tara extra bytes are used for ECC and/or RAID metadata I believe
@astrid @tara extra bytes are used for ECC and/or RAID metadata I believe
astrid, 2 months ago @izaya @tara yep, parity calculations
@izaya @tara yep, parity calculations
astrid, 2 months ago @izaya @tara but only for raid devs that support em
@izaya @tara but only for raid devs that support em
izaya, 2 months ago @astrid you will need to reformat them, I think sg_ yeah you got it
@astrid you will need to reformat them, I think sg_ yeah you got it
astrid, 2 months ago seems like the fix is to run sg_format over them
seems like the fix is to run sg_format over them
astrid, 2 months ago god knows how long this will take
god knows how long this will take
astrid, 2 months ago perhaps an hour? awawawa
perhaps an hour? awawawa
astrid, 2 months ago it seems to have gone through 2% in 5 minutes so assuming linear hard drive formatting behavior this will probably be a few. guess that's what sleep is for
it seems to have gone through 2% in 5 minutes so assuming linear hard drive formatting behavior this will probably be a few. guess that's what sleep is for
Add comment