dev_null

@dev_null@lemmy.ml

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

dev_null,

When I found about the existence of Lemmy, I wanted to create an account, and found that Lemmy.ml is the official Lemmy instance ran by the Lemmy developers (who I knew nothing about). Seemed like the obvious, default, non-controversial choice.

Of course I later learned about… All this. I’m not interested in any political content so it took me a while.

So I guess I’d be a casualty, due to picking the biggest instance suggested to me by join-lemmy.org. How is someone new to Lemmy supposed to have the context here?

dev_null,

What do you suggest would go wrong? I never even gave Steam my name, so how would they even know it’s different?

dev_null, (edited )

Do you have a source? First time I’m hearing about it

dev_null, (edited )

I develop software that has a Windows version, I need a Windows installation to test it.

dev_null,

I definitely used it 2 months ago, maybe it changed since then, or maybe it depends on something.

dev_null,

Guess I will keep my Windows 11 installer ISO around and won’t download the updated one.

dev_null,

Given most of Russia is in Asia, isn’t Russia the Russia of Asia?

dev_null,

Because that’s what they are by definition. Expert systems are a type of AI.

dev_null, (edited )

If you can’t with this one particular email provider, you can just use a different one, or even your own domain.

dev_null, (edited )

You only need to pass access to your password manager, which already includes everything. Since you should already have a physical recovery information card printed for your password manager in a drawer somewhere, it would be found anyway.

dev_null,

It does, you have a full screen scary warning when an app asks for these accessibility permissions. Clearly many people just give it to a random QR code reader app for some reason.

dev_null,

Yes, the app doesn’t steal any information from other apps. The report says the malware just displays a fake bank login page, in the hope the user gives it their details willingly.

dev_null,

According to the report, the app just displays a fake login page. I don’t see a good way to prevent this.

dev_null,

They actual report does say it just displays a fake login page. It’s just phishing.

dev_null,

If a species used radio communication, I don’t think I’d be against people calling it telepathy.

dev_null,

Why inconsistent? It’s a transfer of information without physical interaction and without using any human senses.

I guess the difference in definition would be “human” senses. If you define it as using no human senses it fits, if you define it as not using any senses it doesn’t, but that would be a useless definition, because nothing could possibly satisfy it.

dev_null,

Britannica dictionary defines it with “without using the usual sensory channels”

Cambridge dictionary with “without using words or other physical signals”

Collins “without speech, writing, or any other normal signals”

Merriam-Webster uses “extrasensory”, and they define “extrasensory” as “outside the ordinary senses”

All of it seems to match radio communication, and all require it to be between two persons or minds, so flowers and bees definitely don’t qualify.

dev_null,

And if they could use it to exchange thoughts and ideas with others, I’d call that telepathy, but they don’t/

dev_null,

Hah, I’d expect “ordinary” and “normal” here to mean “ordinary / normal senses for a human”, not for the hypothetical telepathy user. That wouldn’t be a very useful usage of these words, so I doubt that’s what was meant here. There is always a reference point for someone saying something is “normal” or “ordinary”, and that reference point, for a human dictionary, would be a human with human senses.

When I say that a shark has an extraordinary set of teeth, I obviously mean from a human point of view, and not claiming that it’s not normal from the shark’s point of view. And when I, or a dictionary, say that telepathy doesn’t use usual senses, similarly the meaning is that they would be unusual for a human, and personally I would find a species having a sense for radio waves, to be unusual.

dev_null,

Many animals have a vastly superior sense of smell, can see light outside our visible spectrum or hear sound outside our hearing range. But it would be silly to call all these things “telepathy” just because we humans don’t have these senses.

It would be silly to call these things telepathy because by themselves they don’t facilitate a way to communicate thoughts between two minds. Even in the case of radio waves, a sense of radio waves wouldn’t be telepathy by itself, unless there is also a mechanism of generating these radio waves, and unless these two mechanisms are used to communicate ideas between users, just like the sense of hearing is just one part of spoken communication.

If a species had an organ that could generate light outside the visible spectrum to accompany their superior eyes, and they were using it to talk, then yes “telepathic” would a sensible word to describe that. But that special organ, and the mental processing, would be the important parts, not the better eyes.

And when you’re talking about the biology of animals it seems quite self-centred to compare everything to us. We are just one very specific animal.

Well, I didn’t write the definitions. :)

dev_null,

It would be a tremendously bad business move to choose not to revive them. They’d immediately lose all business as people obviously wouldn’t trust their service anymore.

dev_null,

If the future has the technology to revive you, it has the technology to de-age you. So don’t worry, you are either not waking up at all (most likely), or waking up young.

dev_null,

In the comment I was replying to, we are already in the future, already have the tech to revive them, and the company chooses not to.

dev_null,

Maybe it would, but it doesn’t change anything. You asked why would they revive them, they would revive them to prove to potential customers that their service works and get more money. Yes they can just quit making more money like you described, but as I said, that seems like a stupid business decision.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Leos
  • ngwrru68w68
  • InstantRegret
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • modclub
  • everett
  • provamag3
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • lostlight
  • All magazines