@sarajw@viraptor I joined Brave early as a creator. I used to get $1-2 a month through donations. Now I can consider myself lucky if I get $0.50 a month (if you want money, their ads system works well, although it used to pay a lot more, maybe it's overcrowded now?).
As for web monetization, I used to get $0.50-1 a month, but it has been basically dead for over a year. I'd need to track the last time someone donated anything.
Every time I post a comiCSS cartoon that mentions Tailwind, I get some push back and complains from people. I should have been the bigger man and not reply to this comment... But I did.
On the bright side, it gave me an idea for a new cartoon with Tailwind as main topic. So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
I have nothing against people using Tailwind. That's their choice and a great one if it works on their project. But making it their whole personality or trying to shove it down people's throats? That is sad and incredibly annoying... And one of the reasons why I make those cartoons.
@aardrian while it makes sense not to add URLs, quotes, or mixed languages, the part about keeping it short contrasts with what I've heard from blind people who —and I understand that this could be their personal choice and not an opinion shared by everybody— preferred long detailed alternative texts that described the picture accurately over something short but missed details.
Because it is coded with HTML and CSS, updating the text and creating variations is super easy—just change the text inside a div! Here are some alternatives... of course, Tailwind had to be in one 😅
Yesterday, I did a small workshop about drawing with CSS and my experience drawing a comic about CSS in CSS at the Nerdearla conference. As part of the workshop, I created a small meme for comiCSS: https://comicss.art/?id=132
As with other overlays, it makes WCAG/ADA promises, fails to fix stuff, replicates platform features (poorly) in CSS, and introduces WCAG violations just by adding it to a site.