adam

adam, 10 months ago

@Haijo7 @Gargron @Claire actually after further investigation, I am 105% certain the stolen method came from my https://github.com/kudoai/chatgpt.js vs. ChatGPT itself. Why? With hours of one of my contributors titling his commit "Small fixes + Docs updated to commit 5bd947c #107" in https://github.com/kudoai/chatgpt.js/pull/107, Claire titles her commit in same format [actions up to hash] in https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/2339

..but if you nav https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3AClearlyClaire never before did she use this convention, so it cannot be coincidence...

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @Haijo7 @Gargron @Claire I expected you to call these unisolated incidents "coincidence", but curious, what behavior you refer to?

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @Haijo7 @Gargron @Claire And also, to confirm, your stance is this: even though https://elonsucks.org/@Claire@sitedethib.com had never ever followed the convention [Updates to Hash] as proven in her commit history https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/2339, it is a coincidence that she copies this convention from my contributor to the repo she also coiped the refresh method from, simply because it is common to others, yet she did not use until within hours of my contributor doing the same...? This is your logic?

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda @Gargron @Claire @osnews But why is it a coincidence is the question. You can't just say things w/o reason. Simply touting lengthy experience is not reason. Why is it coincidence someone who never followed a certain convention, does it within hours of a contributor to a certain repo does? Why is it coincidence this repo even contains same methods as ones in her PRs? (I have many more examples btw, they will be for my lawyers not you, just curious what your defense is)

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper Why do you possess direct knowledge this single example of many unrevealed instances of theft in fact was not theft, despite the evidence pointing to the obvious contrary? What makes your "knowledge" the truth? Can you be more detailed than the vague & baseless assertions you've been making? (Your word simply being uttered != truth)

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper Indeed I am the person that referenced lawyers. You suggest you with nothing to hide will not reveal what gives you God-like powers to determine what was stolen or not, because my lawyers will use it against you in court, correct?

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda But what do you have to hide? Why can't you simply state what gives you the omnipotent power of possessing absolute knowledge a coincidence occurred, contrary to my evidence proving this is highly unlikely to be true?

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper I don't believe you have ever been more vague in any post you've made that will be any clearer in email. If you can't state the reason you possess your unbelievable knowledge, then you need time to come up with an explanation, so your credibility becomes more and more shot btw

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda ok what is this direct knowledge you speak of? Can you be specific? You know the actions that occurred are conicidences because _____ (fill in the blank, otherwise you are speaking like a God that just knows things without reason)

adam, 10 months ago

@thomholwerda @andypiper this dude wanted to goto email so he could spend hours meeting with Eugen to come up with a conceivable lie for censoring me 🤣

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda what are you talking about, the first line in the first file changed is literally refresh_interval: '30s'. It's obviously to refresh just like my invisible iframe does.

What do you mean by "inconsistency in the timings of the commits" can you be specific instead of vague as usual? Outright state what the probleem is

Re: CoC in what way is it disrespectful to give notice copyright has been violated? Also who deleted the posts? Finally why was it not hidden instead

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda Why is it correct email would make you any less vague than you've proven to be the master of?

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda Andy no one needs your permission to write blog posts, telling someone it's not "required" won't stop them (you actually encouraged me more now). The more you try to object the more suspicious you look, you must realize this at some point...

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda Now that I look back, surely you must have misinterpreted his post https://elonsucks.org/@thomholwerda@social.tchncs.de/110813780657797787 to be directed at you to make such a strange assertive statement. He is telling me (not you) blog is good idea to form timeline for my case (because my timeline proves many "coincidences" occur when it comes to Claire, something you insist is the case without evidence like I've provided)

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda Also the way you talk down on people is not a good look for mastodon. I don't know if Eugen put you up to this, but you're not exactly making the company look more innocent

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper what is your point, it's written by Claire

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda if you respect me prove it, undelete my posts in which I've explained means no disrespect either (if you cannot then the obvious motive is at play)

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda So it is a truth and a fact that it is disrespectful to give notice someone infringed on copyright? And this is your opinion, or Eugen told you that? I'm confused

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper it doesn't say that at all but regardless who you think authored it, they both share culpability and are equally stalking me (Eugen started presenting a fake anti-Elon aura after I emailed him about listing my server)

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper @thomholwerda not sure why you're telling me your day's plans, can you just answer my 1st question (I swear this is like a dental appointment)

adam, 10 months ago

@andypiper indeed you are not being helpful by presenting images that confirm my two stalkers are cooperating in leeching chatgpt.js while avoiding my previous questions to be unanswered