elduvelle, (edited ) to science
@elduvelle@neuromatch.social avatar

- when you receive a manuscript that you’ve previously reviewed, now for the 2nd round, do you 1) only check the response to reviewers or 2) also thoroughly re-read the manuscript? Be honest 😉

bahar,

@elduvelle adding more hashtags in the hope of expanding your sample size #peerreview #scholarlyPublishing

arinbasu1, to essential_readings

@essential_readings

Discussions are underway to broaden the platform to use by other researchers with support from other funders, and the finalised text encourages the EU member states to support turning it into “a collective, not-for-profit, large-scale open-access research publishing service for the public good”.

https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-infrastructure-2023-5-eu-ready-to-back-immediate-open-access-without-author-fees/

#ScholarlyPublishing , #AcademicFediverse

This is good news for scholars and institutions that have capped or limited funding for #OpenAccess publications. Now wait and watch the pushbacks.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • everett
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • tacticalgear
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • khanakhh
  • megavids
  • tester
  • ethstaker
  • cubers
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines