EASE, to random

Our Peer Review Committee would like feedback on the Toolkit for Editors - How to Assess Peer Review Quality: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hZJbC_HhePlrjl5izfgX_Bbr49LtLqjW5O1qW4a9r6k/

Please submit your views by 1 June: https://forms.gle/CogPWXdxVsexQvqUA

Responses are voluntary and may be anonymous. We ask organisations / research groups to submit a single response.

EASE, to random

We are very pleased to have been awarded the DOAJ Seal for our journal, European Science Editing.

The Seal is awarded to journals that demonstrate best practice in publishing, including long-term preservation, use of persistent identifiers, discoverability, reuse policies, and authors' rights.

Congratulations to the Editor-in-Chief, @ksenijab, and all her Editorial team.

ukrio, to random

Researchers can hold paradoxical beliefs about corrections: one, corrections are good for science; two, correcting their own work is bad. James Parry introduces our webinar on corrections with Lauren Flintoft and Gráinne McNamara, who both work on this on a daily basis.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • lostlight
  • All magazines