Is there a standard way to declare that your Atom/RSS feed contains full articles and not just partials/summaries? I’ve noticed that the https://webfeeds.org/rss/1.0 namespace defines a webfeeds:partial element but I have never seen it used (I searched all the code forges and search engines. Not one example).
This is unrelated to feed pagination and archive feeds; I’m talking about having a way to say that each entry contains the full-text of each article.
@jacobwilliams#RSS and #Atom will never die. At least I hope not. With zero extra action on your part, dedicated readers will get notified whenever you write, draw, or record new content. #smallweb
@hub OK good to know, I've updated the ticket to clarify that https://docs.gtk.org/gtk4/class.TreeView.html is deprecated but still exists in GTK4, and that porting from it to ListView could be done as a second step.
Here is a panoramic intellectual history that begins in ancient Greece, ranges across the entire span of Western philosophy and science, and ends with the first direct visual proof of the atom's existence.
I’ve been using #emacs for about 25 years now. Is anybody reading this who has made a switch to some other editor? For a while I thought #atom could be it, but that’s gone now. Looking at #sublime at the moment.
Why switch? I don’t know. #Fomo maybe?
Emacs has seen some releases and development is going on, but it’s slow and getting everything to run a recent #MacOS is not painless. Also, I’ve never finished learning lisp for real and probably won’t find the time before my end.
Well, just typing this post makes me think I should just take “Mastering Emacs” and read it again and this would be a better investment of my time than starting from scratch with sublime…
Maybe one can only learn one editor really well per life?
@tomkalei I'm 30 years in and for a while there was wondering if I was stubbornly swimming against the tide and missing out. But then #emacs and its packages got a new lease of life, and e.g. LSP became highly functional and automatic, and now I'm more committed than ever.
My recent experiences working alongside developers using VS Code has really cemented that I don't want some project-focused IDE that isn't /also/ a general purpose editor and programmable text manipulation engine. Emacs may be bettered by other tools at various specific functionality and polish, but it has much more extensive and comprehensive abilities than anything else.
It's frustrating that it often takes a little more effort to get set up and functioning for some specific environment or task, and also that sometimes the visual polish is not what it could be, but in the end, the actual function of Emacs is superlative and endlessly malleable.
Good point by @robb: “Even if people only ever add your website into their feed reader and let the app find the RSS feed […], showing an RSS link reminds people that RSS exists, a win for the open web.” https://rknight.me/please-expose-your-rss/
Nice to see that my first ever published #TYPO3#extension EXT:feed_display is now used more and more. In the last months there was a significant increase in download numbers. Maybe this correlates with the increasing usage of TYPO3 #v12? #rss#atom#feed#SimplePie
@cybersmog I dare not judge the quality of the code base, that is in the eye of the beholder. As for the documentation, I have definitely made an effort. ☺️
Feed auto-discovery (for RSS, Atom, and/or JSON Feed) enables feed readers to find the URL of related feeds when you enter the URL of a web page. https://dri.es/rss-auto-discovery
Il y a vraiment plus de médias au Québec et au Canada qui doivent supporter le #rss . Surtout avec le fait que Google ne partagera plus les nouvelles. Le RSS ou les feeds #atom permettent de recevoir facilement les nouveaux articles qu'on ne peut plus avoir autrement
Ich glaube, dass sich viele an den Kopf gefasst haben, als Frau #Merkel den Ausstieg aus #Atom beschlossen hat. Ebenso haben sich viele an den Kopf gefasst, als Herr #Benz die Pferde vor'm Wagen weglies.
Frage: machen wir was, um anderen zu gefallen?
Oder weil' s' klug ist?