johncarlosbaez,
@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@pschwahn @AxelBoldt - Ugh! I should have stuck with rational representations, which is what people usually talk about when studying representations of linear algebraic groups.

I'm pretty sure that every finite-dimensional rational representation of GL(n,ℝ) is completely reducible, and every irreducible rational representation comes from one described by a by Young diagram, possibly tensored by a representation 𝑔↦det(𝑔)ⁿ where n is some integer.

(There is some overlap here since the nth exterior power of the tautologous representation, described by a Young diagram, is also the representation 𝑔↦det(𝑔).)

It's annoying that the basic facts about finite-dimensional representations of GL(n,ℝ) aren't on Wikipedia! Someday I'll have to put them on there... once I get enough references to make sure I'm not screwing up!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines