smiergahttu,
@smiergahttu@fosstodon.org avatar

Which is the best comprehensible way of representing land use in different models, knowing that the most optimistic (dark grey, "Bekels 2") is around 9% of the patch and least-optimistic (light gray, "Piggott") is ca. 40%?

I like the simplicity of the v.1 pie chart, but I don't know if the adding pieces is as obvious to the reader as to me. And I want to use this kind of representations throughout the thesis, so I want to choose good one.

version 2. a donut chart representing the same data as version 1 (with different pattern for not used land).
version 3. a donut chart representing the same data as version 1. the first model is multiplied to avoid the apparent differences between most- and least-optimistic models. light green area represents land not used.

gratefulwolf,
@gratefulwolf@archaeo.social avatar

@smiergahttu agree with v.1 pie chart… only could ‘not used’ be omitted (and percentages added)?

mykhaylo,
@mykhaylo@fosstodon.org avatar

@smiergahttu pie charts are never a good idea. Try bar chart instead.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • JUstTest
  • osvaldo12
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines