bughuntercat,

Ironically, Mastodon, which boasts of being free and caring for freedom, often ends up being fundamentalist. Herd thinking is inevitable when thousands of people identify with some. It seems that if non-free or centralized networks are on one political side, then Mastodon automatically has to be on the other side.
The biggest problem is not the algorithm or the advertising, it is not the surveillance. The problem is that we are the same ones who go from one network to another carrying and migrating our data and with them our biases.
I see people trying to make this place a kind of refuge from the burning world, but they bring the fire in their backpack when they come.
The main reason I joined was to follow programming and hacking people and topics, but then I met autistic people and people who are almost philosophers.
It's inevitable, we are like that. But it would be interesting to remember that the restrictions, aggressiveness and turbulence that keep us away from other platforms must be left there.
Maybe no one cares, but I still wanted to say it.

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@bughuntercat I do care despite disagreeing.

The core point is that consensus is building that / and the only way to prevent from destroying the :fediverse: is to "firewall judiciously" as posted on :birdsite: :twitter: aka. :deadbird: ...

https://github.com/greyhat-academy/lists.d/blob/main/activitypub.domains.block.list.tsv

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • mastodon
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • thenastyranch
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • everett
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • kavyap
  • cubers
  • mdbf
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines