@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

ripcord

@ripcord@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ripcord, (edited )
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Or, you know, a good thing happened.

God damn. You people can’t be happy about anything ever, for any reason.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Ladies and gentleman, our very special guest tonight is Mrs. Carol Channing!

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, I have a 5-year old and a 15-year old laptop downstairs acting as servers, and they are runnjng GREAT.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Shit, I thought so too, then I did the math again, and got a the 480k answer. But I used 77 billion, because I am a dope.

ripcord, (edited )
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Believe it or not, it’s better than it used to be.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

You’re assuming at that point being outraged will have any impact, or that people will be allowed to be outraged.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

What’s going to tell if the client has been modified? The client, which has been modified…?

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

And who tells the server that the client hasn’t been modified…?

But then you started to being in external solutions, which of course themselves could be modified, and you’re starting to answer your own question about why it’s pretty hard.

ripcord, (edited )
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

You’re not a developer, I take it.

Ironically, this is the kind of thing that sebinspace was complaining about, even if you’re saying more than just “it’s not hard!”

But the server only knows what the clients tell it. It’s not psychic or magic. And if the client is compromised, there’s all kinds of things you can do. One of the main goals is often just making exploits/cheats as difficult as possible.

On the client-side, some of the anticheat solutions are designed to help prevent the client being modified, or be able to detect if memory of running client has been modified, etc.

Some are to do some kind of regular cryptographic hash of what’s in memory and send that home in a way that is difficult to hack. But that’s difficult too because all the info needed to generate and send this home are running client-side. Its one reason that having TPM chips and things are potential security benefit.

But the point is that this is NOT simple.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Ooo, it’s Jason and a Thousand Screaming Argonauts

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

From my experience, eating out costs more

Hot take

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

I still can’t believe that movie got made.

Wait, let me clarify that. I still can’t believe THAT movie got made.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

His hair was just falling slowly through his head.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

“Failure to launch”…?

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Oh, is that what the phrase is supposed to be about? Gross.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Some days you just can’t get rid of a bomb.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Gotcha.

I guess a difference there is that Israel was paying money. So that has been urgent partly so some people could make a shitton of money.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Either way, you were correct.

ripcord,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

It didn’t really make sense to me in context. Maybe there was some other missing word or grammar that would have made a difference…?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines