nielspflaeging

@nielspflaeging@mastodon.social

#Leadership philosopher, management exorcist, author-publisher, entrepreneur, inventor, practical #sociologist. #BetaCodex Network founder, #Red42 founder, #qomenius founder

Books in EN: #OrganizeForComplexity, #OpenSpaceBeta, #EssaysOnBetaVol1, #WhatWouldDemingDo, #WhatWouldDruckerDo

Creator of #OpenSpaceBeta, #CellStructureDesign, #RelativeTargets, #OrgPhysics and #ChangeAsFlipping

#OrgDesign, #OrgDev, #agility, #transformation, #learningscience, #education, #pedagogy, #corporatelearning

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

nielspflaeging, to Nutanix

The focus of Lean is not to eliminate waste.
The focus of Lean must be to produce #flow in value creation, which will (among other things) lead to waste reduction. If you go straight for eliminating waste, you will not only miss the point.
You will also achieve much less impact.

nielspflaeging, to random

In the last 5 years, we learned that a move to a decentralized, -based pays off financially for the company doing it within at least 6 months from starting (!) the transformation.
Try to think of a more lucrative investment.
http://www.cellstructuredesign.com

nielspflaeging, to random

I sometimes explain to people why the so-called "Cynefin model" is utter crap. I usually start by giving them 1 very simple fact that is false about Cynefin. False as in blatantly wrong. Then something strange happens: People who "use" that model do not reflect, do not get thoughtful, they do not even argue!

Instead, they start talking about how they use that instrument and that it is "still useful". That it "makes people think".
See the irony?

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/curse-double-axis-chart-niels-pflaeging

nielspflaeging,

@matthewskelton
Do you like games? How about you see this as a game? Imagine there are at least 17 profound mistakes in that concept (which there are!).
You do not see them (or so you say). Now you have to spot the first one. Just one. I am sure you can find one within less than 5 minutes.

Can you spot one?
Genuinely interested.

nielspflaeging,

@matthewskelton
Then tell me which ones you see. I would appreciate that transparency from you.
I mean: I already shared an entire article on that shit.

nielspflaeging,

@matthewskelton So you did not read my article.

Why?

nielspflaeging,

@christophbegall @matthewskelton
When someone says, Christoph,that they do not care much about models, then it means they do not care much about science, truth, insight or reason. This in fact is one of the reasons why Appelo is such a dangerous quack. He preaches such anti-scientific attitude, even abusing of Mr Box's famous quote on models for his own, cynical interests.
That man is a Sith.

nielspflaeging,

@matthewskelton
I do not mention Cynefin as it should be obvious that it is one of those Stacey derivatives.
Not sure how you did not "get" that from the article.

I can give you one of 17 falsehoods of . But I can predict that will not make you any wiser, as apparently you refuse to think critically (for yourself!).

Here it comes: Cynefin claims that there are several "domains", right? One of them, "simple"/"obvious" (the crooks keeps renaming stuff for no reason) does not exist.

nielspflaeging,

@matthewskelton @christophbegall
You do not know what you are saying.
He is proud to be a quack.
Ask him. He does not give a shit about insight or science.
Those are cornerstones of professional quackery.

Your lack of critical thinking helps no one.

nielspflaeging,

@matthewskelton @christophbegall
Your cynicism is insulting.
Please block.

nielspflaeging,

@matthewskelton
Purveyors of fraud are the worst.
You are sidelining with the worst of people.

Your choice.

nielspflaeging,

@matthewskelton @christophbegall
That's the way critics have been attacked throughout history.

nielspflaeging, to languagelearning

Great words in English that are grossly underused:

uxorious
(adjective)

having or showing a great or excessive fondness for one's wife.

khpape, to random German

Gerade läuft die Vorab-Webkonferenz für die @ebildungslabor trägt gerade ihre Vorstellung von "BarCircles" vor. Ihr Blogpost dazu: https://ebildungslabor.de/blog/barcamp-learning-circles-barcircles/.
(Ihre Folien sind Bilder von Midjourney.)

nielspflaeging,

@khpape @ebildungslabor
Weisst du aber schon, dass diese Leute da vorgeben, erfunden zu haben - dabei haben sie es nur unverschämt abgekupfert!
Im Prinzip sind das also Betrüger, die du hier promotest. Besonders beschämend: Dank -Lizenz kann eh jede/r nutzen. Warum also vorgeben, man hätte etwas Neues erfunden, wo es das schon längst gibt?

Geht es noch unverschämter und hochstaplerischer?

nielspflaeging,

@slink
Der Accoutn steht doch da, von @khpape genannt.

nielspflaeging,

@slink @khpape
Ja, leider gibt es "zig" Beispiele für Methodenklau, für Innovationsanmassung, unbotmässige Aneignung usw.

Man könnte auch sagen:
Hochstapelei und Betrug sind bedauerlicherweise in manchen Szenen der Businesswelt "normal" geworden: Sie werden auch von niemandem geahndet.
Und das ist eine Form gesellschaftlicher Verrohung.

nielspflaeging, to random

The video recording from Friday's "5 Years of " anniversary celebration is now live! Thanks to tireless & courageous editing work by @rijon. I think you will find very interesting information, connections and narratives in this recording, regarding & , , and . There is certainly stuff that will surprise you. Watch, enjoy - and please share generously!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAHt5zJ6cbw

nielspflaeging, to random

Autopoiesis. A beautiful word.
And an utterly superfluous one.
You cannot do anything useful with it.
The word "living" is entirely sufficient. So forget about autopoiesis and work on living systems, making them "even more alive!"

nielspflaeging,

@gimulnautti
Thanks for commenting!
I think you are mixing up things.
"A.I." is just software. To be exact: A.I. does not really exist, what exists is And that is complicated, dead. Just like any tech.
Only complex, living systems are autopoietic. All complex, living things are. "Living", in this context, of course does not mean "biologically alive".

nielspflaeging,

@gimulnautti
Okay, to make it clear:
There is "living" (biological).
And "living system" (also non-biological).
Both are complex.

"Living system" is the much better term than "autopoietical".

nielspflaeging,

@gimulnautti
We are not doing semantics here.
Semantics is a science. But we are talking practice. And your point is fair. I think I clarified it all when I said I was actually referring not to "living" but to "living systems." Apparently, that's not good enough for you. Fine.

But again: What we talk here is not . Just like "having sex" is not !

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •