outofcontrol, 1 month ago

@elazar I would assume that a bucket blocked from public access would not have this issue?

elazar, 1 month ago

@outofcontrol I would've assumed the same, but the article I linked seems to contradict that assumption.

elazar, 26 days ago

@outofcontrol @bobmagicii I'm guessing enough people raised a stink about this that AWS reversed course.

https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2024/05/amazon-s3-no-charge-http-error-codes/

bobmagicii, 26 days ago

@elazar @outofcontrol now that we all know they were milking that, now they might actually try to keep their network less full of fuck.

bobmagicii, 1 month ago

@elazar reason #549857845 not to use aws anything. i will suffer with my 5$/250GB/Mo s3-like buckets on other hosts thank you very much