fj,
@fj@mastodon.social avatar

Debian: "To retain parity with proprietary software the open development process needs to be entirely exempt from requirements”
https://bits.debian.org/2023/12/debian-statement-cyber-resillience-act.md.html

maarten,

@fj I love Debian to bits. But its statement on the #CyberResilienceAct is based on old text. I suppose that's inherent in commenting on a draft that is evolving behind closed doors. But now the actual text is public, a number of worries in the Debian statement are no longer an accurate reflection of reality.

ondrej,
@ondrej@sury.org avatar

@maarten @bert_hubert @fj People (Debian Developers) voted on different number of texts on ballot. This is a text that should have come from DPL (with paid lawyers on contract) and not from bunch of people who don’t have time to properly study the context.

I opened the ballot and closed it because how the hell I should know which is the proper one? This is not something you can vote with gut feeling.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • JUstTest
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines