spaceflight,
@spaceflight@techhub.social avatar

@guardian 📆 Sun 13 Nov 2022 start 1.04 am EST (6.04 am GMT) Wednesday, : "Analysts, including Nasa’s own inspector general, see the program’s $93bn 💰 tag, including $4.1bn for each of the first launches, as " https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/nov/13/nasa-artemis-1-rocket-moon-launch-next-week

Pictures :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SLS_on_39B_ahead_of_launch_(cropped).jpg | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Starship_%26_Moonset.jpg | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Price_Tag_Flat_Icon_Vector.svg

spaceflight,
@spaceflight@techhub.social avatar

A single engine on 's costs roughly the same amount 💰 that the paid for an entire mission on the rocket 🚀 https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/10/inspector-general-on-nasas-plans-to-reduce-sls-costs-highly-unrealistic/

W6KME,
@W6KME@mastodon.radio avatar

@spaceflight This sounds outrageous to people who simply fail to understand that Falcon heavy is not a direct competitor to SLS. They are quite different in capability. Falcon does certain things very well, but it's not built to throw massive weights beyond LEO. That's not what kerosene does best.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines